Suppr超能文献

A型主动脉夹层修复术后保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换术。

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement after type A aortic dissection repairs.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Jun;29(5):381-387. doi: 10.1177/0218492320977981. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic root reoperation after aortic dissection repair sometimes requires aortic root replacement. A valve-preserving technique should be applied when the aortic cusp is normal. Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique resolves aortic valve regurgitation, root dilatation, and pseudoaneurysm in the proximal anastomosis. Our experience in aortic root reoperation is presented.

METHODS

From January 2000 to March 2019, 26 patients underwent reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique. The time from the initial operation to reoperation was 69.3 ± 51.6 months. Aortic root reoperation was required for a fragile wall at the previous proximal anastomosis or aortic root dilatation. We aimed to stabilize the aortic root without valve regurgitation. The native aortic cusp was aggressively preserved when nearly normal. Indications included root dilatation ( = 13), pseudoaneurysm of the previous proximal anastomosis ( = 11), and aortic valve regurgitation ( = 4).

RESULTS

There was no early postoperative mortality. Follow-up was 49 ± 47 months (range 4-161 months). The 3, 5, and 10-year survival was 88.9% ± 7.4%, 88.9% ± 7.4%, and 77.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. Freedom from recurrence of a greater than moderate degree of aortic valve regurgitation at 3, 5, and 10 years was 86.5% ± 8.9%, 86.5% ± 8.9%, and 86.5% ± 8.9%, respectively. One patient underwent aortic valve replacement for recurrent aortic valve regurgitation 15 months after the valve-sparing reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Midterm outcomes of reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique and postoperative aortic valve performance were satisfactory.

摘要

目的

主动脉夹层修复后的主动脉根部再次手术有时需要进行主动脉根部置换。当主动脉瓣叶正常时,应采用保留瓣膜技术。采用再植入技术的保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术可解决主动脉瓣关闭不全、根部扩张和近端吻合口假性动脉瘤。本文介绍了我们的主动脉根部再次手术经验。

方法

自 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月,26 例患者接受了再植入技术的再次保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术。初次手术至再次手术的时间为 69.3±51.6 个月。再次手术的原因是前次近端吻合口的脆弱壁或主动脉根部扩张。我们的目标是在没有瓣叶关闭不全的情况下稳定主动脉根部。当主动脉瓣叶几乎正常时,积极保留原生瓣叶。适应证包括根部扩张(n=13)、前次近端吻合口假性动脉瘤(n=11)和主动脉瓣关闭不全(n=4)。

结果

无术后早期死亡。随访时间为 49±47 个月(4-161 个月)。3、5 和 10 年生存率分别为 88.9%±7.4%、88.9%±7.4%和 77.8%±12.2%。3、5 和 10 年时无中度以上主动脉瓣关闭不全复发的生存率分别为 86.5%±8.9%、86.5%±8.9%和 86.5%±8.9%。1 例患者在保留瓣膜再手术后 15 个月因主动脉瓣关闭不全复发行主动脉瓣置换术。

结论

采用再植入技术的再次保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术的中期结果和术后主动脉瓣功能令人满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验