• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A型主动脉夹层修复术后保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换术。

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement after type A aortic dissection repairs.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Jun;29(5):381-387. doi: 10.1177/0218492320977981. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1177/0218492320977981
PMID:33249852
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic root reoperation after aortic dissection repair sometimes requires aortic root replacement. A valve-preserving technique should be applied when the aortic cusp is normal. Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique resolves aortic valve regurgitation, root dilatation, and pseudoaneurysm in the proximal anastomosis. Our experience in aortic root reoperation is presented.

METHODS

From January 2000 to March 2019, 26 patients underwent reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique. The time from the initial operation to reoperation was 69.3 ± 51.6 months. Aortic root reoperation was required for a fragile wall at the previous proximal anastomosis or aortic root dilatation. We aimed to stabilize the aortic root without valve regurgitation. The native aortic cusp was aggressively preserved when nearly normal. Indications included root dilatation ( = 13), pseudoaneurysm of the previous proximal anastomosis ( = 11), and aortic valve regurgitation ( = 4).

RESULTS

There was no early postoperative mortality. Follow-up was 49 ± 47 months (range 4-161 months). The 3, 5, and 10-year survival was 88.9% ± 7.4%, 88.9% ± 7.4%, and 77.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. Freedom from recurrence of a greater than moderate degree of aortic valve regurgitation at 3, 5, and 10 years was 86.5% ± 8.9%, 86.5% ± 8.9%, and 86.5% ± 8.9%, respectively. One patient underwent aortic valve replacement for recurrent aortic valve regurgitation 15 months after the valve-sparing reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Midterm outcomes of reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique and postoperative aortic valve performance were satisfactory.

摘要

目的

主动脉夹层修复后的主动脉根部再次手术有时需要进行主动脉根部置换。当主动脉瓣叶正常时,应采用保留瓣膜技术。采用再植入技术的保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术可解决主动脉瓣关闭不全、根部扩张和近端吻合口假性动脉瘤。本文介绍了我们的主动脉根部再次手术经验。

方法

自 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月,26 例患者接受了再植入技术的再次保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术。初次手术至再次手术的时间为 69.3±51.6 个月。再次手术的原因是前次近端吻合口的脆弱壁或主动脉根部扩张。我们的目标是在没有瓣叶关闭不全的情况下稳定主动脉根部。当主动脉瓣叶几乎正常时,积极保留原生瓣叶。适应证包括根部扩张(n=13)、前次近端吻合口假性动脉瘤(n=11)和主动脉瓣关闭不全(n=4)。

结果

无术后早期死亡。随访时间为 49±47 个月(4-161 个月)。3、5 和 10 年生存率分别为 88.9%±7.4%、88.9%±7.4%和 77.8%±12.2%。3、5 和 10 年时无中度以上主动脉瓣关闭不全复发的生存率分别为 86.5%±8.9%、86.5%±8.9%和 86.5%±8.9%。1 例患者在保留瓣膜再手术后 15 个月因主动脉瓣关闭不全复发行主动脉瓣置换术。

结论

采用再植入技术的再次保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术的中期结果和术后主动脉瓣功能令人满意。

相似文献

1
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement after type A aortic dissection repairs.A型主动脉夹层修复术后保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换术。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Jun;29(5):381-387. doi: 10.1177/0218492320977981. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
2
Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair.术前主动脉根部形态和术后瓣叶形态主要决定了保留主动脉瓣根部修复术后的长期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;143(6):1389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
Causes and management of aortic valve regurgitation after aortic valve reimplantation.主动脉瓣再植入术后主动脉瓣反流的原因和处理。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3):774-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.经 Tirone David 主动脉瓣保留式主动脉根部替换术后轻度主动脉瓣反流的发生率和进展情况。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):169-77, 178.e1-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
Survival and reoperation after valve-sparing root replacement and root repair in acute type A dissection.急性A型夹层行保留瓣膜的根部替换和根部修复术后的生存和再次手术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;156(6):2076-2082.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.096. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Outcomes of aortic root replacement with tricuspid aortic valve reimplantation in patients with residual aortic regurgitation.三尖瓣主动脉瓣再植入术治疗残余主动脉瓣反流患者的主动脉根部置换术结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan;167(1):101-111.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.038. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Two decades of experience with root remodeling and valve repair for bicuspid aortic valves.二十年来对二叶式主动脉瓣行根部重建和瓣膜修复的经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):S65-S71. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
8
Repair of regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves: a systematic approach.二叶式主动脉瓣反流的修复:一种系统性方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;140(2):276-284.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.058. Epub 2010 May 20.
9
David operation: single center 10-year experience.大卫手术:单中心10年经验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Aug;56(4):639-45. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.瓣环尺寸及瓣环成形术在三尖瓣主动脉瓣修复中的作用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):428-37; discussion 437-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv050. Epub 2015 Feb 26.