Betts Alexander, Easton-Calabria Evan, Pincock Kate
University of Oxford, UK.
Overseas Development Institute, UK.
World Dev. 2021 Mar;139:105311. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105311. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing socioeconomic impact on already marginalised refugee communities demonstrate both the need for, and lack of, localisation in humanitarian and development responses. Our research with organisations founded and led by refugees, termed here refugee-led organisations (RLOs), in camps and cities in Kenya and Uganda shows their potential to be an asset in the response to COVID-19 and in contributing to more effective and participatory forms of humanitarian assistance. In this research note we draw on pre-pandemic research with around 80 RLOs and follow-up research with 15 in Uganda and Kenya who are actively responding to the pandemic and its effects. We identify five key areas in which refugees are or could be involved as responders to COVID-19 and other pandemics: providing public information, supplementing capacity gaps, healthcare delivery, shaping social norms, and virus tracking and contact tracing. Our research during COVID-19 shows how RLOs have pivoted their existing service provision to fill assistance gaps, including in areas directly related to public health. As the humanitarian system searches for ways to implement remote and participatory approaches to refugee assistance, RLOs offer great potential, if mechanisms can be found to identify those that are effective, provide them with funding, and build their capacities.
新冠疫情及其对本就处于边缘地位的难民社区造成的社会经济影响,既凸显了人道主义和发展应对措施本地化的必要性,也暴露出其不足之处。我们对肯尼亚和乌干达难民营及城市中由难民创立并领导的组织(此处称为难民主导组织,即RLO)开展的研究表明,这些组织有潜力成为应对新冠疫情的资产,并为人道主义援助更有效、更具参与性的形式做出贡献。在本研究报告中,我们借鉴了疫情前对约80个难民主导组织的研究,以及对乌干达和肯尼亚15个正在积极应对疫情及其影响的难民主导组织的后续研究。我们确定了难民作为新冠疫情及其他大流行病应对者可以或可能参与的五个关键领域:提供公共信息、弥补能力差距、提供医疗服务、塑造社会规范以及病毒追踪和接触者追踪。我们在新冠疫情期间的研究表明,难民主导组织如何调整其现有服务提供方式以填补援助缺口,包括在与公共卫生直接相关的领域。随着人道主义系统寻求实施远程和参与性难民援助方法,如果能够找到机制来识别有效的难民主导组织、为其提供资金并建设其能力,那么这些组织具有巨大潜力。