Suppr超能文献

高频喷射通气对心率的动脉压力反射调节的影响。

Effects of high-frequency jet ventilation on arterial baroreflex regulation of heart rate.

作者信息

Rouby J J, Houissa M, Brichant J F, Baron J F, McMillan C, Arthaud M, Amzallag P, Viars P

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Université Paris VI, France.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Dec;63(6):2216-22. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.6.2216.

Abstract

Fifteen anesthetized mechanically ventilated patients recovering from multiple trauma were studied to compare the effects of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV) on arterial baroreflex regulation of heart rate. Systolic arterial pressure and right atrial pressure were measured using indwelling catheters. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and mean airway pressure were continuously monitored. Lung volumes were measured using two linear differential transformers mounted on thoracic and abdominal belts. Baroreflex testing was performed by sequential intravenous bolus injections of phenylephrine (200 micrograms) and nitroglycerin (200 micrograms) to raise or lower systolic arterial pressure by 20-30 Torr. Baroreflex regulation of heart rate was expressed as the slope of the regression line between R-R interval of the ECG and systolic arterial pressure. In each mode of ventilation the ventilatory settings were chosen to control mean airway pressure and arterial PCO2 (PaCO2). In HFJV a tidal volume of 159 +/- 61 ml was administered at a frequency of 320 +/- 104 breaths/min, whereas in CPPV a tidal volume of 702 +/- 201 ml was administered at a frequency of 13 +/- 2 breaths/min. Control values of systolic arterial pressure, R-R interval, mean pulmonary volume above apneic functional residual capacity, end-expiratory pulmonary volume, right atrial pressure, mean airway pressure, PaCO2, pH, PaO2, and temperature before injection of phenylephrine or nitroglycerin were comparable in HFJV and CPPV. Baroreflex regulation of heart rate after nitroglycerin injection was significantly higher in HFJV (4.1 +/- 2.8 ms/Torr) than in CPPV (1.96 +/- 1.23 ms/Torr).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对15例因多发伤而接受麻醉并机械通气、且正在康复的患者进行了研究,以比较高频喷射通气(HFJV)和持续正压通气(CPPV)对心率的动脉压力反射调节的影响。使用留置导管测量收缩期动脉压和右心房压。持续监测心电图(ECG)和平均气道压。使用安装在胸带和腹带上的两个线性差动变压器测量肺容积。通过依次静脉推注去氧肾上腺素(200微克)和硝酸甘油(200微克)使收缩期动脉压升高或降低20 - 30托,来进行压力反射测试。心率的压力反射调节以心电图R - R间期与收缩期动脉压之间回归线的斜率表示。在每种通气模式下,选择通气设置以控制平均气道压和动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)。在HFJV中,潮气量为159±61毫升,频率为320±104次/分钟,而在CPPV中,潮气量为702±201毫升,频率为13±2次/分钟。在注射去氧肾上腺素或硝酸甘油之前,HFJV和CPPV的收缩期动脉压、R - R间期、高于呼吸暂停功能残气量的平均肺容积、呼气末肺容积、右心房压、平均气道压、PaCO2、pH、PaO2和温度的对照值具有可比性。注射硝酸甘油后,HFJV中心率的压力反射调节(4.1±2.8毫秒/托)显著高于CPPV(1.96±1.23毫秒/托)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验