• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两个不同职业监测系统的非安全与安全器械锐器伤发生率数据。

Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.

机构信息

International Safety Center, Apopka, Florida, USA.

International Safety Center, Apopka, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jun;96(2):195-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.021
PMID:28314636
Abstract

The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard as amended by the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act requiring the use of safety-engineered medical devices to prevent needlesticks and sharps injuries has been in place since 2001. Injury changes over time include differences between those from non-safety compared with safety-engineered medical devices. This research compares two US occupational incident surveillance systems to determine whether these data can be generalized to other facilities and other countries either with legislation in place or considering developing national policies for the prevention of sharps injuries among healthcare personnel.

摘要

美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的血源性病原体标准经《针具安全与预防法案》修订后,要求使用安全工程医疗器械来预防针刺和锐器伤害,自 2001 年以来一直生效。随着时间的推移,伤害情况有所变化,包括非安全工程医疗器械和安全工程医疗器械之间的差异。本研究比较了两个美国职业事故监测系统,以确定这些数据是否可以推广到其他设施和其他国家,无论这些国家是否已经立法或正在考虑制定预防医护人员锐器伤害的国家政策。

相似文献

1
Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.比较两个不同职业监测系统的非安全与安全器械锐器伤发生率数据。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jun;96(2):195-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
2
Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.评估锐器安全装置:符合美国职业安全与健康管理局的意图。美国职业安全与健康管理局
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;22(7):456-8. doi: 10.1086/501934.
3
The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.美国保护医护人员免受血源性病原体伤害的政策的影响:安全工程设备的关键作用。
J Infect Public Health. 2008;1(2):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
4
Needlestick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers Administering COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States.美国 COVID-19 疫苗接种医护人员的针刺伤。
New Solut. 2021 May;31(1):16-19. doi: 10.1177/10482911211001483. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices.英国医疗保健中的锐器伤:损伤率、病毒传播及安全装置潜在功效的综述
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):566-74. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql122. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
6
Sharp truth: health care workers remain at risk of bloodborne infection.严峻事实:医护人员仍面临血源性病原体感染风险。
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;65(3):210-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu206. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
Issues in understanding the impact of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act on hospital sharps injuries.理解《针刺安全与预防法案》对医院锐器伤影响的问题。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):935-9. doi: 10.1086/671733. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
8
Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.引入一种工程化锐器伤预防装置对医护人员经皮损伤率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):165-70. doi: 10.1086/511699. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
9
Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.使用静脉导管系统预防针刺伤。
Nurs Stand. 2010;24(29):42-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2010.03.24.29.42.c7628.
10
Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation.国家实施针刺伤立法后,手术环境与非手术环境中的锐器伤发生率均增加。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Safety and Safety Device Sharp Injuries-Risk of Incidents, SEDs Availability, Attitudes and Perceptions of Nurses According to Cross-Sectional Survey in Poland.非安全和安全装置锐器伤-根据波兰横断面调查的事件风险、SEDs 可获得性、护士态度和看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811315.
2
Needlestick and sharps injuries at a German university hospital: epidemiology, causes and preventive potential - a descriptive analysis.德国某大学医院针刺伤和锐器伤:流行病学、原因和预防潜力——描述性分析。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Aug 1;35(4):497-507. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01854. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Comparing risk changes of needlestick injuries between countries adopted and not adopted the needlestick safety and prevention act: A meta-analysis.
比较采用和未采用《针刺安全与预防法案》的国家之间针刺伤风险变化:一项荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1221-1227. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.372. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.使用具有和不具有安全功能的装置时发生针刺和锐器伤的原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238721.
5
Testing and Clinical Management of Health Care Personnel Potentially Exposed to Hepatitis C Virus - CDC Guidance, United States, 2020.美国疾病预防控制中心 2020 年发布的《医疗卫生保健人员丙型肝炎病毒潜在暴露后的检测和临床管理指南》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Jul 24;69(6):1-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6906a1.
6
Development of a Safe Syringe Disposal System Moving towards Automated Syringe Data Collection.迈向自动注射器数据收集的安全注射器处理系统的开发。
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):47-50. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.1.47. Epub 2019 Jan 31.