All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Moscow 127550, Russia.
Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;11(12):1407. doi: 10.3390/genes11121407.
Synthetic promoters are vital for genetic engineering-based strategies for crop improvement, but effective methodologies for their creation and systematic testing are lacking. We report here on the comparative analysis of the promoters pro-SmAMP1 and pro-SmAMP2 from () and (). These promoters are more effective than the well-known 35S promoter. Although these promoters share about 94% identity, the pro-SmAMP1 promoter demonstrated stronger transient expression of a reporter gene in infiltration of leaves, while the pro-SmAMP2 promoter was more effective for the selection of transgenic tobacco () cells when driving a selectable marker. Using the cap analysis of gene expression method, we detected no differences in the structure of the transcription start sites for either promoter in transgenic plants. For both promoters, we used fine-scale deletion analysis to identify 160 bp-long sequences that retain the unique properties of each promoter. With the use of chimeric promoters and directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the superiority of the pro-SmAMP1 promoter for -mediated infiltration is caused by the proline-inducible ACTCAT -element strictly positioned relative to the TATA box in the core promoter. Surprisingly, the ACTCAT -element not only activated but also suppressed the efficiency of the pro-SmAMP1 promoter under proline stress. The absence of the ACTCAT -element and CAANNNNATC motif (negative regulator) in the pro-SmAMP2 promoter provided a more constitutive gene expression profile and better selection of transgenic cells on selective medium. We created a new synthetic promoter that enjoys high effectiveness both in transient expression and in selection of transgenic cells. Intact promoters with differing properties and high degrees of sequence identity may thus be used as a basis for the creation of new synthetic promoters for precise and coordinated gene expression.
合成启动子对于基于基因工程的作物改良策略至关重要,但缺乏有效的创建和系统测试方法。我们在此报告了来自 () 和 () 的 pro-SmAMP1 和 pro-SmAMP2 启动子的比较分析。这些启动子比著名的 35S 启动子更有效。尽管这些启动子具有约 94%的同一性,但 pro-SmAMP1 启动子在 的叶片瞬时表达报告基因时表现出更强的活性,而 pro-SmAMP2 启动子在驱动选择标记时更有效地选择转化烟草 () 细胞。使用帽分析基因表达方法,我们在转基因植物中未检测到这两个启动子转录起始位点结构的差异。对于这两个启动子,我们使用精细的缺失分析来鉴定保留每个启动子独特性质的 160 个碱基对长的序列。使用嵌合启动子和定向诱变,我们证明了 pro-SmAMP1 启动子在介导渗透中具有优越性是由于严格相对于核心启动子 TATA 盒定位的脯氨酸诱导的 ACTCAT 元件。令人惊讶的是,ACTCAT 元件不仅激活了 pro-SmAMP1 启动子,而且在脯氨酸胁迫下还抑制了其效率。pro-SmAMP2 启动子中缺乏 ACTCAT 元件和 CAANNNNATC 基序(负调节剂)提供了更组成型的基因表达谱,并在选择培养基上更好地选择转化细胞。我们创建了一种新的合成启动子,它在瞬时表达和转化细胞的选择方面都具有很高的效率。具有不同性质和高度序列同一性的完整启动子因此可以用作创建新的合成启动子以实现精确和协调基因表达的基础。