• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估倡导者对加拿大背部技能培训(BeST)计划实施的影响:一项混合方法可行性研究方案

Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol.

作者信息

Hall Amanda, Richmond Helen, Bursey Krystal, Hansen Zara, Williamson Esther, Copsey Bethan, Albury Charlotte, Asghari Shabnam, Curran Vernon, Pike Andrea, Etchegary Holly, Lamb Sarah

机构信息

Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Medicine, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Medicine, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e040834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834
PMID:33257487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7705520/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is global recognition that low back pain (LBP) should be managed with a biopsychosocial approach. Previous implementation of this approach resulted in low uptake and highlighted the need for ongoing support. This study aims to explore the feasibility of (i) training and using a champion to support implementation, (ii) using a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), (iii) collecting patient reported outcome measures in a Canadian public healthcare setting and to identify contextual barriers to implementation.

METHODS

A pragmatic cluster RCT with embedded qualitative study with physiotherapists treating LBP in publicly funded physiotherapy departments in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Participants will complete a previously developed online training course to equip them to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention for LBP. Clusters randomised to the intervention arm will receive additional support from a champion. A minimum champion training package has been developed based on known barriers in the literature. This includes strategies to target barriers relating to group-based scheduling issues, lack of managerial support, perceived patient factors such as addressing patient expectations for other types of treatments or selecting which patients might be best suited for this intervention, and anxiety about delivering something new. This package will be further codeveloped with study champions based on identified implementation barriers using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Clusters will be monitored for 6 months to assess champion and physiotherapist recruitment and retention, acceptability and implementation of the champion training, and the viability of conducting a cluster RCT in this setting. A purposive sample of physiotherapists will be interviewed from both arms.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Authority in December 2018. Results will be disseminated to academic audiences through conferences and peer reviewed publications; to all study participants, their clinical leads, and patients with LBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04377529; Memorial University of Newfoundland Protocol Record 20190025; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

全球都认识到,下背痛(LBP)应采用生物心理社会方法进行管理。此前实施这种方法的效果不佳,采用率较低,这凸显了持续支持的必要性。本研究旨在探讨以下方面的可行性:(i)培训并利用倡导者来支持实施;(ii)采用整群随机对照试验(RCT);(iii)在加拿大公共医疗环境中收集患者报告的结局指标,并确定实施过程中的背景障碍。

方法

在加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多省由公共资金资助的物理治疗部门中,对治疗下背痛的物理治疗师进行一项务实的整群随机对照试验,并嵌入定性研究。参与者将完成一个先前开发的在线培训课程,使其有能力为下背痛提供生物心理社会干预。随机分配到干预组的整群将获得倡导者的额外支持。基于文献中已知的障碍,已制定了一个最低限度的倡导者培训包。这包括针对与基于群体的排班问题、缺乏管理支持、感知到的患者因素(如满足患者对其他类型治疗的期望或选择哪些患者可能最适合这种干预)以及对提供新事物的焦虑等相关障碍的策略。将根据使用行为改变轮确定的实施障碍,与研究倡导者进一步共同制定这个培训包。将对整群进行6个月的监测,以评估倡导者和物理治疗师的招募与留存情况、倡导者培训的可接受性和实施情况,以及在这种环境中进行整群随机对照试验的可行性。将从两组中选取有目的的物理治疗师样本进行访谈。

伦理与传播

本研究于2018年12月获得纽芬兰与拉布拉多省健康研究伦理委员会批准。研究结果将通过会议和同行评审出版物传播给学术受众;传播给所有研究参与者、他们的临床负责人以及下背痛患者。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04377529;纽芬兰纪念大学方案记录20190025;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdea/7705520/36252b908540/bmjopen-2020-040834f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdea/7705520/7af92c22b0fe/bmjopen-2020-040834f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdea/7705520/36252b908540/bmjopen-2020-040834f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdea/7705520/7af92c22b0fe/bmjopen-2020-040834f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdea/7705520/36252b908540/bmjopen-2020-040834f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol.评估倡导者对加拿大背部技能培训(BeST)计划实施的影响:一项混合方法可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e040834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834.
2
Independent prescribing by advanced physiotherapists for patients with low back pain in primary care: protocol for a feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative component.独立处方权由高级物理治疗师在初级保健中为腰痛患者开出:一项可行性试验的方案,嵌入定性部分。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e027745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027745.
3
Theory-driven group-based complex intervention to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain in primary care physiotherapy: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial (SOLAS).基于理论的小组式综合干预措施,以支持初级保健物理治疗中骨关节炎和腰痛的自我管理:一项整群随机对照可行性试验(SOLAS)方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 21;6(1):e010728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010728.
4
Determining the impact of a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain: protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.确定一种由物理治疗师主导的新型腰痛初级保健模式的影响:一项试点整群随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2279-7.
5
Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain.运用混合方法评估来评估循证干预在线临床培训的可行性:以腰痛的认知行为治疗为例
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 18;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0683-4.
6
Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention in primary care: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness (SupportBack 2).用互联网干预措施支持基层医疗中的下腰痛自我管理:一项关于临床和成本效益的随机对照试验的方案(SupportBack 2)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e040543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040543.
7
Feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth ('Rapid Stratified Telehealth') for patients with low back pain: protocol for a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial.为低背痛患者提供并评估分层医疗与远程医疗整合的可行性(“快速分层远程医疗”):一项可行性和初步随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e056339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056339.
8
Feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a theory-driven group-based complex intervention versus usual physiotherapy to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain (SOLAS).可行性整群随机对照试验,评估一种基于理论的团体复杂干预措施与常规物理治疗,以支持骨关节炎和腰痛的自我管理(SOLAS)。
Trials. 2020 Sep 23;21(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04671-x.
9
Physiotherapists' barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a behaviour change-informed exercise intervention to promote the adoption of regular exercise practice in patients at risk of recurrence of low back pain: a qualitative study.物理治疗师在实施基于行为改变的运动干预以促进有腰痛复发风险的患者养成规律运动习惯方面的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 26;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02274-y.
10
Evaluating Acupuncture and Standard carE for pregnant women with Back pain (EASE Back): a feasibility study and pilot randomised trial.评估针灸与标准护理对背痛孕妇的效果(EASE Back):一项可行性研究和初步随机试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(33):1-236. doi: 10.3310/hta20330.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of a Nationally Enhanced Service incentive for weight management: A longitudinal qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of UK primary care staff on weight management using normalisation process theory.一项关于体重管理的全国强化服务激励措施的实施:一项基于常态化过程理论的关于英国初级保健人员对体重管理的认知与经历的纵向定性研究。
Clin Obes. 2025 Oct;15(5):e70020. doi: 10.1111/cob.70020. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Physiotherapists Using the Biopsychosocial Model for Chronic Pain: Barriers and Facilitators-A Scoping Review.物理治疗师在慢性疼痛中应用生物心理社会模式:障碍和促进因素——范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;20(2):1634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021634.

本文引用的文献

1
Physiotherapists' perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.物理治疗师对学习和实施生物心理社会干预措施以治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛病症的认知:定性研究的系统评价与综合分析
Pain. 2020 Jun;161(6):1150-1168. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809.
2
Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.物理治疗师在管理肌肉骨骼疾病时是否遵循基于证据的指南?系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e032329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329.
3
Clinical guidelines for low back pain: A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines.
临床下背痛指南:对三大主要指南中一致性和不一致性的批判性回顾。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):968-980. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
4
Characteristics of Quality Improvement Champions in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.养老院质量改进倡导者的特征:一项对循证实践有启示意义的系统评价
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Dec;14(6):440-446. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12262. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
6
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
7
Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review.物理治疗师提供的认知行为干预对腰痛有效,但能否在临床实践中得到推广?一项系统综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236155. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
8
Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain.运用混合方法评估来评估循证干预在线临床培训的可行性:以腰痛的认知行为治疗为例
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 18;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0683-4.
9
The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.认知行为疗法对非特异性下腰痛的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134192. eCollection 2015.
10
Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中样本量确定的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv113. Epub 2015 Jul 13.