Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e056339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056339.
Long waiting time is an important barrier to accessing recommended care for low back pain (LBP) in Australia's public health system. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to establish the feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth ('Rapid Stratified Telehealth'), which aims to reduce waiting times for LBP.
We will conduct a single-centre feasibility and pilot RCT with nested qualitative interviews. Sixty participants with LBP newly referred to a hospital outpatient clinic will be randomised to receive Rapid Stratified Telehealth or usual care. Rapid Stratified Telehealth involves matching the mode and type of care to participants' risk of persistent disabling pain (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool) and presence of potential radiculopathy. 'Low risk' patients are matched to one session of advice over the telephone, 'medium risk' to telehealth physiotherapy plus App-based exercises, 'high risk' to telehealth physiotherapy, App-based exercises, and an online pain education programme, and 'potential radiculopathy' fast tracked to usual in-person care. Primary outcomes include the feasibility of delivering Rapid Stratified Telehealth (ie, acceptability assessed through interviews with clinicians and patients, intervention fidelity, appointment duration, App useability and online pain education programme usage) and evaluating Rapid Stratified Telehealth in a future trial (ie, recruitment rates, consent rates, lost to follow-up and missing data). Secondary outcomes include waiting times, number of appointments, intervention and healthcare costs, clinical outcomes (pain, function, quality of life, satisfaction), healthcare use and adverse events (AEs). Quantitative analyses will be descriptive and inform a future adequately-powered RCT. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis.
This study has received approval from the Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone: X21-0221). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.
ACTRN12621001104842.
在澳大利亚的公共卫生系统中,长等待时间是获得推荐的腰痛(LBP)治疗的一个重要障碍。本研究描述了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的方案,该试验旨在确定分层护理与远程医疗相结合的可行性(“快速分层远程医疗”),以减少 LBP 的等待时间。
我们将进行一项单中心可行性和试点 RCT,并进行嵌套定性访谈。60 名新转诊到医院门诊的 LBP 患者将被随机分配接受快速分层远程医疗或常规护理。快速分层远程医疗涉及根据 Keele STarT MSK 工具评估参与者持续致残性疼痛的风险和潜在神经根病的存在,匹配模式和类型的护理。“低风险”患者接受电话咨询一次,“中风险”患者接受远程健康理疗和基于 App 的锻炼,“高风险”患者接受远程健康理疗、基于 App 的锻炼和在线疼痛教育计划,“潜在神经根病”快速转入常规当面护理。主要结局包括提供快速分层远程医疗的可行性(即通过与临床医生和患者进行访谈评估可接受性、干预的忠实性、预约持续时间、App 的可用性和在线疼痛教育计划的使用情况)和评估快速分层远程医疗在未来试验中的可行性(即招募率、同意率、失访和数据缺失)。次要结局包括等待时间、预约次数、干预和医疗保健成本、临床结局(疼痛、功能、生活质量、满意度)、医疗保健使用和不良事件(AE)。定量分析将是描述性的,并为未来的充分-powered RCT 提供信息。访谈数据将使用主题分析进行分析。
这项研究已获得伦理审查委员会的批准(RPAH 区:X21-0221)。结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在会议上展示。
ACTRN12621001104842。