Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32519-32527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017094117. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
The evolutionary significance of epigenetic inheritance is controversial. While epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation can affect gene function and change in response to environmental conditions, their role as carriers of heritable information is often considered anecdotal. Indeed, near-complete DNA methylation reprogramming, as occurs during mammalian embryogenesis, is a major hindrance for the transmission of nongenetic information between generations. Yet it remains unclear how general DNA methylation reprogramming is across the tree of life. Here we investigate the existence of epigenetic inheritance in the honey bee. We studied whether fathers can transfer epigenetic information to their daughters through DNA methylation. We performed instrumental inseminations of queens, each with four different males, retaining half of each male's semen for whole genome bisulfite sequencing. We then compared the methylation profile of each father's somatic tissue and semen with the methylation profile of his daughters. We found that DNA methylation patterns were highly conserved between tissues and generations. There was a much greater similarity of methylomes within patrilines (i.e., father-daughter subfamilies) than between patrilines in each colony. Indeed, the samples' methylomes consistently clustered by patriline within colony. Samples from the same patriline had twice as many shared methylated sites and four times fewer differentially methylated regions compared to samples from different patrilines. Our findings indicate that there is no DNA methylation reprogramming in bees and, consequently, that DNA methylation marks are stably transferred between generations. This points to a greater evolutionary potential of the epigenome in invertebrates than there is in mammals.
表观遗传遗传的进化意义存在争议。虽然表观遗传标记,如 DNA 甲基化,可以影响基因功能,并对环境条件的变化作出反应,但它们作为可遗传信息载体的作用通常被认为是偶然的。事实上,在哺乳动物胚胎发生过程中发生的近乎完全的 DNA 甲基化重编程是遗传信息在世代间传递的主要障碍。然而,目前尚不清楚 DNA 甲基化重编程在生命之树中是多么普遍。在这里,我们研究了蜜蜂是否存在表观遗传遗传。我们研究了父亲是否可以通过 DNA 甲基化将表观遗传信息传递给女儿。我们对蜂王进行了工具性授精,每个蜂王与四个不同的雄蜂交配,保留每个雄蜂精液的一半进行全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序。然后,我们比较了每个父亲的体细胞组织和精液与他女儿的甲基化谱。我们发现,组织和代际之间的 DNA 甲基化模式高度保守。在每个殖民地中,种系内(即父系-女儿亚系)的甲基组相似性要比种系间大得多。事实上,样本的甲基组在殖民地内始终按种系聚类。来自同一父系的样本具有两倍的共享甲基化位点,四倍的差异甲基化区域与来自不同父系的样本相比。我们的研究结果表明,蜜蜂没有 DNA 甲基化重编程,因此,DNA 甲基化标记在代际间稳定传递。这表明,与哺乳动物相比,无脊椎动物的表观基因组具有更大的进化潜力。