Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2018 Mar 26;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4594-0.
Aggression is influenced by individual variation in temperament as well as behavioral plasticity in response to adversity. DNA methylation is stably maintained over time, but also reversible in response to specific environmental conditions, and may thus be a neuromolecular regulator of both of these processes. A previous study reported DNA methylation differences between aggressive Africanized and gentle European honey bees. We investigated whether threat-induced aggression altered DNA methylation profiles in the honey bee brain in response to a behavioral stimulus (aggression-provoking intruder bee or inert control). We sampled five minutes and two hours after stimulus exposure to examine the effect of time on epigenetic profiles of aggression.
There were DNA methylation differences between aggressive and control bees for individual cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpGs) across the genome. Eighteen individual CpG sites showed significant difference between aggressive and control bees 120 min post stimulus. For clusters of CpGs, we report four genomic regions differentially methylated between aggressive and control bees at the 5-min time point, and 50 regions differentially methylated at the120-minute time point following intruder exposure. Differential methylation occurred at genes involved in neural plasticity, chromatin remodeling and hormone signaling. Additionally, there was a significant overlap of differential methylation with previously published epigenetic differences that distinguish aggressive Africanized and gentle European honey bees, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved use of brain DNA methylation in the regulation of aggression. Lastly, we identified individually statistically suggestive CpGs that as a group were significantly associated with differentially expressed genes underlying aggressive behavior and also co-localize with binding sites of transcription factors involved in neuroplasticity or neurodevelopment.
There were DNA methylation differences in the brain associated with response to an intruder. These differences increased in number a few hours after the initial exposure and overlap with previously reported aggression-associated genes and neurobiologically relevant transcription factor binding sites. Many DNA methylation differences that occurred in association with the expression of aggression in real time also exist between Africanized bees and European bees, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved role for epigenetic regulation in aggressive behavior.
攻击性受到个体气质差异以及对逆境的行为可塑性的影响。DNA 甲基化随时间稳定维持,但也可根据特定环境条件而逆转,因此可能是这两个过程的神经分子调节剂。先前的研究报告了在攻击性较强的非洲化蜜蜂和攻击性较弱的欧洲蜜蜂之间存在 DNA 甲基化差异。我们研究了威胁诱导的攻击性是否会改变蜜蜂大脑中的 DNA 甲基化谱,以响应行为刺激(攻击性挑衅的入侵者蜜蜂或惰性对照)。我们在刺激暴露后 5 分钟和 2 小时采样,以检查时间对攻击性表观遗传谱的影响。
在整个基因组中,个别胞嘧啶-鸟嘌呤二核苷酸(CpG)的 DNA 甲基化存在差异。在刺激后 120 分钟,18 个单独的 CpG 位点在攻击性和对照蜜蜂之间表现出显著差异。对于 CpG 簇,我们报告了在 5 分钟时间点,在攻击性和对照蜜蜂之间存在四个基因组区域的差异甲基化,在入侵者暴露后 120 分钟时间点存在 50 个区域的差异甲基化。差异甲基化发生在涉及神经可塑性、染色质重塑和激素信号的基因上。此外,与先前区分攻击性较强的非洲化和攻击性较弱的欧洲蜜蜂的表观遗传差异存在显著重叠,表明大脑 DNA 甲基化在调节攻击性方面具有进化上保守的作用。最后,我们确定了具有统计学意义的个体 CpG,这些 CpG 作为一组与攻击性行为的差异表达基因显著相关,并且与涉及神经可塑性或神经发育的转录因子的结合位点也重合。
在大脑中与对入侵者的反应相关存在 DNA 甲基化差异。这些差异在最初暴露几个小时后数量增加,并且与先前报道的与攻击性相关的基因和神经生物学相关的转录因子结合位点重叠。在实时与攻击性表达相关的许多 DNA 甲基化差异也存在于非洲化蜜蜂和欧洲蜜蜂之间,这表明表观遗传调控在攻击性行为中具有进化上保守的作用。