• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pendulum 和 Jones 夹具引导下的 II 类矫治稳定后再使用固定矫治器。

Stability of class II treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig followed by fixed appliances.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.

Department of Orthodontics, Guarulhos University UNG, Guarulhos, Brazil.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Aug;24(3):370-378. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12447. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12447
PMID:33259104
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term stability of Class II correction with the Pendulum or Jones jig followed by fixed appliances.

SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Group 1 comprised 20 Class II malocclusion patients with a mean initial age of 13.97 years (SD = 1.57), treated with Pendulum and fixed appliances for a mean period of 4.72 years (SD = 0.98), and mean long-term post-treatment evaluation of 4.72 years (SD = 0.97). Group 2 consisted of 18 Class II patients with a mean initial age of 13.19 years (SD = 1.26), treated with Jones jig and fixed appliances for a mean period of 3.96 years (SD = 0.92). Mean long-term post-treatment time was 5.50 years (SD = 1.57).

METHODS

Lateral cephalograms were evaluated at three stages: initial (T1), final (T2) and long-term post-treatment (T3). Intragroup comparisons were performed with repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test and intergroup comparisons with independent t test.

RESULTS

Many treatment changes were observed in both groups. From the long-term post-treatment periods, there was stability for most of the variables. Maxillary second molars and mandibular first molars extruded in the Jones jig group and slightly intruded in the Pendulum appliance group. The nasolabial angle decreased in the Pendulum group and increased in the Jones jig group.

CONCLUSION

The correction of a Class II malocclusion was shown to be stable with similar long-term post-treatment results with Pendulum or Jones jig followed by fixed orthodontic appliances.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估和比较使用 Pendulum 或 Jones 夹具联合固定矫治器治疗 II 类错颌的长期稳定性。

设置和样本人群

第 1 组包括 20 名平均初始年龄为 13.97 岁(标准差=1.57)的 II 类错颌患者,使用 Pendulum 和固定矫治器治疗,平均治疗时间为 4.72 年(标准差=0.98),平均长期治疗后评估时间为 4.72 年(标准差=0.97)。第 2 组由 18 名平均初始年龄为 13.19 岁(标准差=1.26)的 II 类错颌患者组成,使用 Jones 夹具和固定矫治器治疗,平均治疗时间为 3.96 年(标准差=0.92)。平均长期治疗后时间为 5.50 年(标准差=1.57)。

方法

在三个阶段评估侧位头颅侧位片:初始(T1)、最终(T2)和长期治疗后(T3)。使用重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行组内比较,使用独立 t 检验进行组间比较。

结果

两组都观察到了许多治疗变化。从长期治疗后期间来看,大多数变量都保持稳定。上颌第二磨牙和下颌第一磨牙在 Jones 夹具组中出现外倾,在 Pendulum 矫治器组中略出现内倾。鼻唇角在 Pendulum 组中减小,在 Jones 夹具组中增大。

结论

使用 Pendulum 或 Jones 夹具联合固定矫治器治疗 II 类错颌的矫正结果在长期治疗后是稳定的,具有相似的结果。

相似文献

1
Stability of class II treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig followed by fixed appliances.Pendulum 和 Jones 夹具引导下的 II 类矫治稳定后再使用固定矫治器。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Aug;24(3):370-378. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12447. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.II类错牙合畸形治疗中,Jones矫治器联合固定矫治器的头影测量效果
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):44-51. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar.
3
Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.颈椎颅颌牵引和 Jones 矫治器联合固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)畸形的牙颌面及软组织变化的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
4
Teeth angulations after class II treatment with the Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective panoramic analysis.采用 Jones Jig 治疗 II 类错颌后再用固定矫治器进行治疗:回顾性全景分析。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
5
Class II malocclusion treatment effects with Jones Jig and Distal Jet followed by fixed appliances.Jones Jig 和 Distal Jet 治疗 II 类错颌畸形的效果,随后使用固定矫治器。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):10-19. doi: 10.2319/022517-142.1. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
6
Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.使用摆式矫治器和琼斯矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合畸形,随后进行固定正畸矫治的头影测量对比研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):58-64. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600010.
7
Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances.Ⅱ类错颌畸形的治疗随 Jones 夹具、远移装置和第一类矫治器的使用而改变。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190364. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0364. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.头帽与摆式矫治器联合固定正畸治疗的效果比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):572-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn060.
9
Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.Jones矫治器和摆式矫治器的远中移动效果比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.035.
10
Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.上颌磨牙远中移动或下颌前伸:包括摆锤矫治器和Herbst矫治器的综合正畸治疗的头影测量比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Feb;123(2):108-16. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.7.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term stability of maxillary molar distalization in the treatment of Angle Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.安氏II类错牙合畸形治疗中上颌磨牙远移的长期稳定性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 29;29(5):277. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06339-9.