Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242976. eCollection 2020.
Restrictions in the eligibility requirements for disability benefits have been introduced in many countries, on the assumption that this will increase work incentives for people with chronic illness and disabilities. Evidence to support this assumption is unclear, but there is a danger that removal of social protection without increased employment would increase the risk of poverty among disabled people. This paper presents a systematic review of the evidence on the employment effects of changes to eligibility criteria across OECD countries.
Systematic review of all empirical studies from OECD countries from 1990 to June 2018 investigating the effect of changes in eligibility requirements and income replacement level of disability benefits on the employment of disabled people. Studies were narratively synthesised, and meta-analysis was performed using meta-regression on all separate results. The systematic review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (Registration code: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018103930).
Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria from seven countries. Eight investigated an expansion of eligibility criteria and nine a restriction. There were 36 separate results included from the 17 studies. Fourteen examined an expansion of eligibility; six found significantly reduced employment, eight no significant effect and one increased employment. Twenty-two results examined a restriction in eligibility for benefits; three found significantly increased employment, 18 no significant effect and one reduced employment. Meta-regression of all studies produced a relative risk of employment of 1.06 (95% CI 0.999 to 1.014; I2 77%).
There was no firm evidence that changes in eligibility affected employment of disabled people. Restricting eligibility therefore has the potential to lead to a growing number of people out of employment with health problems who are not eligible for adequate social protection, increasing their risk of poverty. Policymakers and researchers need to address the lack of robust evidence for assessing the employment impact of these types of welfare reforms as well as the potential wider poverty impacts.
许多国家都对残疾福利的资格要求进行了限制,假设这将提高慢性病和残疾患者的工作积极性。但支持这一假设的证据并不明确,而且如果没有增加就业,取消社会保护可能会增加残疾人贫困的风险。本文系统地回顾了经合组织国家在资格标准变化对就业影响方面的证据。
系统地审查了经合组织国家自 1990 年至 2018 年 6 月间所有关于残疾福利资格要求和收入替代水平变化对残疾人就业影响的实证研究。对所有单独的结果进行了元回归的荟萃分析。该系统评价方案已在前瞻性系统评价登记处(注册号:PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018103930)进行了登记。
有 17 项研究符合纳入标准,来自 7 个国家。其中 8 项研究了资格标准的扩大,9 项研究了限制。17 项研究中有 36 个单独的结果。14 项研究考察了资格扩大;其中 6 项发现就业显著减少,8 项无显著影响,1 项增加了就业。22 项研究考察了福利资格的限制;其中 3 项发现就业显著增加,18 项无显著影响,1 项减少了就业。对所有研究进行元回归得出的就业相对风险为 1.06(95%置信区间 0.999 至 1.014;I2 为 77%)。
没有确凿的证据表明资格的变化影响了残疾人的就业。因此,限制资格有可能导致越来越多有健康问题但不符合充分社会保护条件的人失业,增加他们陷入贫困的风险。政策制定者和研究人员需要解决缺乏评估这类福利改革对就业影响的有力证据以及可能产生的更广泛的贫困影响的问题。