Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;271(6):1169-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01201-3. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by an increased emotional sensitivity and dysfunctional capacity to regulate emotions. While amygdala and prefrontal cortex interactions are regarded as the critical neural mechanisms underlying these problems, the empirical evidence hereof is inconsistent. In the current study, we aimed to systematically test different properties of brain connectivity and evaluate the predictive power to detect borderline personality disorder. Patients with borderline personality disorder (n = 51), cluster C personality disorder (n = 26) and non-patient controls (n = 44), performed an fMRI emotion regulation task. Brain network analyses focused on two properties of task-related connectivity: phasic refers to task-event dependent changes in connectivity, while tonic was defined as task-stable background connectivity. Three different network measures were estimated (strength, local efficiency, and participation coefficient) and entered as separate models in a nested cross-validated linear support vector machine classification analysis. Borderline personality disorder vs. non-patient controls classification showed a balanced accuracy of 55%, which was not significant under a permutation null-model, p = 0.23. Exploratory analyses did indicate that the tonic strength model was the highest performing model (balanced accuracy 62%), and the amygdala was one of the most important features. Despite being one of the largest data-sets in the field of BPD fMRI research, the sample size may have been limited for this type of classification analysis. The results and analytic procedures do provide starting points for future research, focusing on network measures of tonic connectivity, and potentially focusing on subgroups of BPD.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特征是情绪敏感性增加和情绪调节功能障碍。虽然杏仁核和前额叶皮层的相互作用被认为是这些问题的关键神经机制,但目前的证据并不一致。在本研究中,我们旨在系统地测试脑连接的不同特性,并评估其检测边缘型人格障碍的预测能力。边缘型人格障碍患者(n=51)、C 组人格障碍患者(n=26)和非患者对照组(n=44)进行了 fMRI 情绪调节任务。脑网络分析集中在任务相关连接的两个特性上:相位是指连接随任务事件的变化,而紧张是指任务稳定的背景连接。估计了三种不同的网络度量(强度、局部效率和参与系数),并作为单独的模型输入到嵌套交叉验证线性支持向量机分类分析中。边缘型人格障碍与非患者对照组的分类显示出 55%的平衡准确性,在置换零模型下没有显著差异,p=0.23。探索性分析确实表明,紧张强度模型是表现最好的模型(平衡准确性为 62%),杏仁核是最重要的特征之一。尽管这是 BPD fMRI 研究领域最大的数据集之一,但这种分类分析的样本量可能有限。结果和分析程序确实为未来的研究提供了起点,重点是紧张连接的网络度量,并可能关注 BPD 的亚组。