University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Wayne State University, School of Social Work, 5447 Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Dec;50(12):2472-2486. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01361-4. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
Electronic forms of dating violence among youth are common yet little is known about how these forms of violence overlap with the commonly studied domains of physical, sexual and verbal teen dating violence. Using factor analysis and latent class analysis, this study identifies patterns of electronic, verbal, physical and sexual dating violence victimization and perpetration in 9th and 12th graders. Data are from 470 9th (n = 190; 60.5% female; mean age = 12.0 years, age range: 11.3-13.8) and 12th graders (n = 280; 63.9% female; mean age = 14.9 years, age range: 14.0-16.6) from southeastern Michigan. A 5-class solution for 9th graders and a 6-class solution for 12th graders were selected given fit and interpretability. Classes were characterized by domain(s) of violence, as opposed to perpetration or victimization. Three domains of electronic dating aggression were identified: monitoring, harassment, and coercion. Electronic dating aggression was present in the majority of classes, and overlapped substantially with other domains of violence. The highest risk class had risk of victimization and perpetration for all types of dating violence (electronic monitoring, electronic harassment, electronic coercion, verbal violence, physical violence and sexual violence). Drug use and experiencing one or more adverse childhood experiences predicted membership in a higher risk group for the older cohort, while alcohol consumption predicted higher risk for the younger cohort. The findings from this study show overlap between dating violence domains and imply that domains of electronic dating violence are important to consider in conjunction with physical, sexual and verbal domains, to address teen dating violence.
电子形式的青少年约会暴力很常见,但人们对这些形式的暴力与通常研究的身体、性和言语青少年约会暴力领域之间的重叠情况知之甚少。本研究使用因子分析和潜在类别分析,确定了 9 年级和 12 年级青少年电子、言语、身体和性约会暴力受害和施暴的模式。数据来自密歇根州东南部的 470 名 9 年级(n=190;60.5%为女性;平均年龄为 12.0 岁,年龄范围为 11.3-13.8)和 12 年级(n=280;63.9%为女性;平均年龄为 14.9 岁,年龄范围为 14.0-16.6)学生。鉴于拟合度和可解释性,选择了 9 年级的 5 类和 12 年级的 6 类解决方案。这些类别以暴力领域为特征,而不是施暴或受害。确定了三种电子约会攻击领域:监控、骚扰和胁迫。电子约会攻击在大多数类别中都存在,并且与其他暴力领域有很大重叠。风险最高的类别具有所有类型约会暴力(电子监控、电子骚扰、电子胁迫、言语暴力、身体暴力和性暴力)的受害和施暴风险。药物使用和经历一种或多种不良童年经历预测了更高级别队列的更高风险群体成员资格,而饮酒则预测了更年轻队列的更高风险。本研究的结果表明,约会暴力领域之间存在重叠,并暗示电子约会暴力领域与身体、性和言语领域一样重要,需要结合考虑,以解决青少年约会暴力问题。