NORC at the University of Chicago, 4350 East-West Highway, 8th Floor, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 May;45(5):959-72. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0448-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Parenting behaviors such as monitoring and communications are known correlates of abusive outcomes in adolescent dating relationships. This longitudinal study draws on separate parent (58 % female; 61 % White non-Hispanic, 12 % Black non-Hispanic, 7 % other non-Hispanic, and 20 % Hispanic) and youth (ages 12-18 years; 48 % female) surveys from the nationally representative Survey of Teen Relationships and Intimate Violence. Latent class analyses were applied to investigate whether there are distinguishable parenting profiles based on six measures of parent-youth relationship and interactions, with youth's attitudes about abusive dating behavior and both perpetration and victimization examined in a follow-up survey as distal outcomes (n = 1117 parent-youth dyads). A three-class model-a "Positive Parenting" class, a "Strict/Harsh Parenting" class, and a "Disengaged/Harsh Parenting" class-was selected to best represent the data. The selected latent class model was conditioned on parents' (anger trait, relationship quality, attitudes about domestic violence) and youth's (prior victimization and perpetration) covariates, controlling for parent's gender, race/ethnicity, income, marital status, and youth's age and gender. Youth in the "Positive Parenting" class were significantly less likely 1 year later to be tolerant of violence against boyfriends under any conditions as well as less likely to perpetrate adolescent relationship abuse or to be a victim of adolescent relationship abuse. Parents' anger and relationship quality and youth's prior perpetration of adolescent relationship abuse as well as gender, age, and race/ethnicity predicted class membership, informing universal prevention program and message design, as well as indicated efforts to target communications and services for parents as well as for youth.
父母教养行为,如监督和沟通,是青少年恋爱关系中虐待行为的已知相关因素。这项纵向研究借鉴了来自全国代表性青少年恋爱关系和亲密暴力调查的独立父母(58%为女性;61%为白种非西班牙裔,12%为黑种非西班牙裔,7%为其他非西班牙裔,20%为西班牙裔)和青少年(12-18 岁;48%为女性)的调查。潜在类别分析被应用于调查是否存在基于父母与子女关系和互动的六个衡量标准的可区分的父母教养模式,青少年对虐待性约会行为的态度以及在后续调查中作为远端结果的虐待行为的实施和受害情况(n=1117 对父母-青少年对子)。选择了一个三类别模型——“积极教养”类别、“严格/苛刻教养”类别和“疏离/苛刻教养”类别,以最好地代表数据。选择的潜在类别模型取决于父母(愤怒特质、关系质量、对家庭暴力的态度)和青少年(以前的受害和实施)的协变量,控制了父母的性别、种族/民族、收入、婚姻状况以及青少年的年龄和性别。一年后,处于“积极教养”类别的青少年更不可能在任何情况下容忍对男朋友的暴力,也不太可能实施青少年恋爱关系虐待或成为青少年恋爱关系虐待的受害者。父母的愤怒和关系质量以及青少年以前实施的青少年恋爱关系虐待以及性别、年龄和种族/民族预测了类别成员,为普及预防计划和信息设计提供了信息,并表明需要努力针对父母和青少年的沟通和服务。