Milburn Gerard, Shrapnel Sally
Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia.
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Sep 8;20(9):687. doi: 10.3390/e20090687.
Characterising causal structure is an activity that is ubiquitous across the sciences. are representational devices that can be used as oracles for future interventions, to predict how values of some variables will change in response to interventions on others. Recent work has generalised concepts from this field to situations involving quantum systems, resulting in a new notion of quantum causal structure. A key concept in both the classical and quantum context is that of an . Interventions are the controlled operations required to identify causal structure and ultimately the feature that endows causal models with empirical meaning. Although interventions are a crucial feature of both the classical and quantum causal modelling frameworks, to date there has been no discussion of their physical basis. In this paper, we consider interventions from a physical perspective and show that, in both the classical and quantum case, they are constrained by the thermodynamics of measurement and feedback in open systems. We demonstrate that the perfect "atomic" or "surgical" interventions characterised by Pearl's famous do-calculus are physically impossible, and this is the case for both classical and quantum systems.
表征因果结构是一项在各门科学中普遍存在的活动。因果模型是一种表示手段,可被用作预测未来干预措施的神谕,以预测某些变量的值将如何响应于对其他变量的干预而变化。最近的工作已将该领域的概念推广到涉及量子系统的情形,从而产生了量子因果结构这一新概念。经典和量子背景下的一个关键概念都是干预。干预是识别因果结构所需的受控操作,最终也是赋予因果模型以经验意义的特征。尽管干预是经典和量子因果建模框架的一个关键特征,但迄今为止尚未对其物理基础进行讨论。在本文中,我们从物理角度考虑干预,并表明,在经典和量子情形中,它们都受到开放系统中测量和反馈的热力学的约束。我们证明,由珀尔著名的do演算所表征的完美“原子”或“外科手术式”干预在物理上是不可能的,经典和量子系统都是如此。