• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对多适应症研究的试验的统计设计考虑因素。

Statistical design considerations for trials that study multiple indications.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):785-798. doi: 10.1177/0962280220975187. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220975187
PMID:33267746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9907719/
Abstract

Breakthroughs in cancer biology have defined new research programs emphasizing the development of therapies that target specific pathways in tumor cells. Innovations in clinical trial design have followed with master protocols defined by inclusive eligibility criteria and evaluations of multiple therapies and/or histologies. Consequently, characterization of subpopulation heterogeneity has become central to the formulation and selection of a study design. However, this transition to master protocols has led to challenges in identifying the optimal trial design and proper calibration of hyperparameters. We often evaluate a range of null and alternative scenarios; however, there has been little guidance on how to synthesize the potentially disparate recommendations for what may be optimal. This may lead to the selection of suboptimal designs and statistical methods that do not fully accommodate the subpopulation heterogeneity. This article proposes novel optimization criteria for calibrating and evaluating candidate statistical designs of master protocols in the presence of the potential for treatment effect heterogeneity among enrolled patient subpopulations. The framework is applied to demonstrate the statistical properties of conventional study designs when treatments offer heterogeneous benefit as well as identify optimal designs devised to monitor the potential for heterogeneity among patients with differing clinical indications using Bayesian modeling.

摘要

癌症生物学的突破定义了新的研究计划,强调开发针对肿瘤细胞特定途径的疗法。临床试验设计的创新也随之而来,采用包容性纳入标准和对多种疗法和/或组织学进行评估来定义主方案。因此,亚群异质性的特征已成为制定和选择研究设计的核心。然而,这种向主方案的转变导致在确定最佳试验设计和超参数正确校准方面面临挑战。我们经常评估一系列零假设和替代假设情景;然而,关于如何综合潜在的最佳建议,以确定最佳方案,几乎没有指导。这可能导致选择次优设计和统计方法,这些设计和方法不能充分适应亚群异质性。本文提出了在纳入患者亚群中存在治疗效果异质性的情况下,校准和评估主方案候选统计设计的新优化标准。该框架用于展示常规研究设计在治疗具有异质性获益时的统计特性,并确定旨在监测具有不同临床指征的患者之间潜在异质性的最佳设计,使用贝叶斯建模。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/a0a02cf32fbb/nihms-1870304-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/d1017558aeb6/nihms-1870304-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/966589124753/nihms-1870304-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/1730e0942df9/nihms-1870304-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/a0a02cf32fbb/nihms-1870304-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/d1017558aeb6/nihms-1870304-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/966589124753/nihms-1870304-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/1730e0942df9/nihms-1870304-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a099/9907719/a0a02cf32fbb/nihms-1870304-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical design considerations for trials that study multiple indications.针对多适应症研究的试验的统计设计考虑因素。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):785-798. doi: 10.1177/0962280220975187. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Basket Designs: Statistical Considerations for Oncology Trials.篮式设计:肿瘤学试验的统计学考量
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00194.
3
Bayesian and frequentist approaches to sequential monitoring for futility in oncology basket trials: A comparison of Simon's two-stage design and Bayesian predictive probability monitoring with information sharing across baskets.贝叶斯和频率派方法在肿瘤篮子试验中的无效性序贯监测:西蒙两阶段设计和贝叶斯预测概率监测与跨篮子信息共享的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272367. eCollection 2022.
4
Bayesian basket trial design with false-discovery rate control.贝叶斯篮子试验设计与错误发现率控制。
Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;19(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/17407745211073624. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Bayesian response-adaptive designs for basket trials.用于篮式试验的贝叶斯响应自适应设计。
Biometrics. 2017 Sep;73(3):905-915. doi: 10.1111/biom.12668. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Bayesian basket trial design with exchangeability monitoring.贝叶斯篮子试验设计与可交换性监测。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 10;37(25):3557-3572. doi: 10.1002/sim.7893. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
8
PMED: Optimal Bayesian Platform Trial Design with Multiple Endpoints.PMED:具有多个终点的最优贝叶斯平台试验设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jul 4;32(4):567-581. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080692. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive basket trial designs.贝叶斯层次模型在自适应篮子试验设计中的应用。
Pharm Stat. 2023 May-Jun;22(3):531-546. doi: 10.1002/pst.2289. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
10
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating historic information to further improve power when conducting Bayesian information borrowing in basket trials.在篮子试验中进行贝叶斯信息借鉴时纳入历史信息以进一步提高检验效能。
Biostatistics. 2024 Dec 31;26(1). doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf016.
2
Leveraging information from secondary endpoints to enhance dynamic borrowing across subpopulations.利用次要终点的信息增强亚人群间的动态借用。
Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae118.
3
New clinical trial design borrowing information across patient subgroups based on fusion-penalized regression models.

本文引用的文献

1
Basket Designs: Statistical Considerations for Oncology Trials.篮式设计:肿瘤学试验的统计学考量
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00194.
2
Seamless Designs: Current Practice and Considerations for Early-Phase Drug Development in Oncology.无缝设计:肿瘤学早期药物开发的当前实践和考虑因素。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Feb 1;111(2):118-128. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy196.
3
Statistical challenges posed by uncontrolled master protocols: sensitivity analysis of the vemurafenib study.未控主方案带来的统计学挑战:vemurafenib 研究的敏感性分析。
基于融合惩罚回归模型的亚组患者信息借用的新型临床试验设计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):1718-1730. doi: 10.1177/09622802241267355. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Recent innovations in adaptive trial designs: A review of design opportunities in translational research.适应性试验设计的最新创新:转化研究中的设计机会综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr 28;7(1):e125. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.537. eCollection 2023.
5
Guidance on interim analysis methods in clinical trials.临床试验中期分析方法指南。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 15;7(1):e124. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.552. eCollection 2023.
6
Bayesian and frequentist approaches to sequential monitoring for futility in oncology basket trials: A comparison of Simon's two-stage design and Bayesian predictive probability monitoring with information sharing across baskets.贝叶斯和频率派方法在肿瘤篮子试验中的无效性序贯监测:西蒙两阶段设计和贝叶斯预测概率监测与跨篮子信息共享的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272367. eCollection 2022.
7
Bayesian local exchangeability design for phase II basket trials.贝叶斯局部交换设计在 II 期篮子试验中的应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Sep 30;41(22):4367-4384. doi: 10.1002/sim.9514. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
8
Basket Trials: Review of Current Practice and Innovations for Future Trials.篮子试验:当前实践的回顾与未来试验的创新。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct 20;40(30):3520-3528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02285. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
A group-sequential randomized trial design utilizing supplemental trial data.利用补充试验数据的分组序贯随机试验设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Feb 20;41(4):698-718. doi: 10.1002/sim.9249. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2296-2301. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy457.
4
Bayesian basket trial design with exchangeability monitoring.贝叶斯篮子试验设计与可交换性监测。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 10;37(25):3557-3572. doi: 10.1002/sim.7893. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
5
Bayesian hierarchical modeling based on multisource exchangeability.基于多源可交换性的贝叶斯层次建模。
Biostatistics. 2018 Apr 1;19(2):169-184. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx031.
6
Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both.用于研究多种疗法、多种疾病或两者兼有的主方案。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):62-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510062.
7
Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples.临床研究中的统计学争议:篮子试验、伞式试验和其他主方案:综述和实例。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):34-43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw413.
8
Basket Trials in Oncology: A Trade-Off Between Complexity and Efficiency.肿瘤学中的篮子试验:复杂性与效率之间的权衡
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 20;35(3):271-273. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9751. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Adaptive Design for a Confirmatory Basket Trial in Multiple Tumor Types Based on a Putative Predictive Biomarker.基于假定预测性生物标志物的多瘤种确证性篮子试验的适应性设计。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Dec;100(6):617-625. doi: 10.1002/cpt.446. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations.维莫非尼用于治疗伴有BRAF V600突变的多种非黑色素瘤癌症。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):726-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502309.