• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇的全身不良反应:系统评价。

Systemic adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroid use in asthma: a systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000756.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000756
PMID:33268342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7713222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroid use increases the risk of systemic adverse effects including osteoporosis, bone fractures, diabetes, ocular disorders and respiratory infections. We sought to understand if inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in asthma is also associated with increased risk of systemic effects.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify studies that were designed to investigate ICS-related systemic adverse effects in people with asthma. Studies were grouped by outcome: bone mineral density (BMD), respiratory infection (pneumonia or mycobacterial infection), diabetes and ocular disorder (glaucoma or cataracts). Study information was extracted using the PICO checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (randomised controlled trials) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I tool (observational studies). A narrative synthesis was carried out due to the low number of studies reporting each outcome.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 2 trials and 11 observational studies. Study numbers by outcome were: six BMD, six respiratory infections (four pneumonia, one tuberculosis (TB), one non-TB mycobacteria), one ocular disorder (cataracts) and no diabetes. BMD studies found conflicting results (three found loss of BMD and three found no loss), but were limited by study size, short follow-up and lack of generalisability. Studies addressing infection risk generally found positive associations but suffered from a lack of power, misclassification and selection bias. The one study which assessed ocular disorders found an increased risk of cataracts. Most studies were not able to fully adjust for known confounders, including oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of studies assessing systemic adverse effects associated with ICS use in asthma. Those studies that have been carried out present conflicting findings and are limited by multiple biases and residual confounding. Further appropriately designed studies are needed to quantify the magnitude of the risk for ICS-related systemic effects in people with asthma.

摘要

背景

口服皮质类固醇的使用会增加发生全身性不良反应的风险,包括骨质疏松症、骨折、糖尿病、眼部疾病和呼吸道感染。我们试图了解哮喘患者使用吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)是否也与全身性不良反应风险增加有关。

方法

检索 MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库,以确定旨在研究哮喘患者 ICS 相关全身性不良反应的研究。研究结果分为以下几类:骨密度(BMD)、呼吸道感染(肺炎或分枝杆菌感染)、糖尿病和眼部疾病(青光眼或白内障)。使用 PICO 清单提取研究信息。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(随机对照试验)和干预措施非随机研究偏倚风险工具(观察性研究)评估偏倚风险。由于每个结果报告的研究数量较少,因此进行了叙述性综合。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究共有 13 项,其中 2 项为试验,11 项为观察性研究。按结果分类的研究数量如下:6 项 BMD、6 项呼吸道感染(4 项肺炎、1 项肺结核(TB)、1 项非 TB 分枝杆菌)、1 项眼部疾病(白内障)和无糖尿病。BMD 研究结果存在矛盾(3 项研究发现 BMD 丢失,3 项研究发现 BMD 未丢失),但受到研究规模、随访时间短和缺乏普遍性的限制。研究感染风险的研究通常发现存在正相关,但存在缺乏效力、分类错误和选择偏倚的问题。评估眼部疾病的唯一一项研究发现白内障风险增加。大多数研究都无法充分调整已知的混杂因素,包括口服皮质类固醇。

结论

评估哮喘患者使用 ICS 与全身性不良反应相关的研究很少。已开展的研究结果存在矛盾,受到多种偏倚和残余混杂因素的限制。需要进一步开展设计合理的研究,以量化哮喘患者 ICS 相关全身性不良反应的风险程度。

相似文献

1
Systemic adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroid use in asthma: a systematic review.哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇的全身不良反应:系统评价。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000756.
2
Bone mineral density and fracture risk with long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis.哮喘患者长期使用吸入性糖皮质激素的骨矿物质密度和骨折风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 24;5(11):e008554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008554.
3
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁以下儿童慢性哮喘的比较效果的系统评价和经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(20):1-174, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12200.
4
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults.间歇性与每日吸入皮质类固醇治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD009611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009611.pub3.
5
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults.间歇性与每日吸入糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009611.pub2.
6
Long-term effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bone mineral density in older women with asthma or COPD: a registry-based cohort study.长期吸入皮质类固醇对哮喘或 COPD 老年女性骨密度的影响:基于登记的队列研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Oct 29;13(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0537-2.
7
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
8
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults.在未使用过类固醇的成年持续性哮喘患者中,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.
9
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus placebo in addition to inhaled corticosteroids in children and adults with chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与安慰剂用于慢性哮喘儿童和成人并联合吸入性糖皮质激素的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005535.
10
Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects on growth.吸入性糖皮质激素对持续性哮喘儿童生长发育的影响
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):829-930. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1988.

引用本文的文献

1
New insights into mesenchymal stem cells in inflammatory subtypes of asthma.间充质干细胞在哮喘炎症亚型中的新见解。
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 26;16:1649597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1649597. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in Patients Using Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Narrative Review.预防吸入性糖皮质激素使用者发生口咽念珠菌病的非药物干预措施:一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;13(14):1718. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141718.
3
Prevalence, Change and Burden of Systemic Corticosteroid Use in Type 2 Inflammation Associated Diseases Over 25 Years - A Nationwide Danish Study.25年间2型炎症相关疾病中全身使用皮质类固醇的患病率、变化及负担——一项丹麦全国性研究
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Jun 6;18:967-981. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S525508. eCollection 2025.
4
Unlocking Asthma Remission: Key Insights From an Expert Roundtable Discussion.开启哮喘缓解之路:专家圆桌讨论的关键见解
Respirology. 2025 Jun;30(6):466-479. doi: 10.1111/resp.70047. Epub 2025 May 23.
5
Advancing Obstructive Airway Disease Treatment: Dual PDE3/4 Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy.推进阻塞性气道疾病治疗:双重磷酸二酯酶3/4抑制作为一种治疗策略。
Cells. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):659. doi: 10.3390/cells14090659.
6
Glucocorticoid Insensitivity in Severe Asthma: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms, Challenges, and Emerging Therapies.重度哮喘中的糖皮质激素不敏感性:潜在分子机制、挑战及新兴疗法
Arch Intern Med Res. 2025;8(2):107-120. doi: 10.26502/aimr.0202. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
7
Comparison of ICS dose reduction vs. montelukast discontinuation for step-down therapy in well-controlled asthma: a pilot randomized controlled trial.在病情得到良好控制的哮喘患者中,吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)减量与停用孟鲁司特用于降阶梯治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的初步研究
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03629-6.
8
What We Know to Date About Early Treatment With Biologics in Severe Asthma: A Scoping Review About the Use of Biologics in Severe Asthma and Possible Parallels With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.目前我们对重度哮喘生物制剂早期治疗的了解:关于生物制剂在重度哮喘中的应用以及与早期类风湿关节炎可能相似之处的范围综述
Open Respir Arch. 2025 Feb 28;7(2):100418. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100418. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
9
Treatment of lung diseases nanoparticles and nanorobots: Are these viable alternatives to overcome current treatments?肺部疾病的治疗——纳米颗粒与纳米机器人:它们是克服现有治疗方法的可行替代方案吗?
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Feb 26;31:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101616. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Aurantio-Obtusin Suppresses Airway Inflammation and Serum ICAM-1 Expression in Guinea Pig Allergic Asthma Model.橙黄决明素抑制豚鼠过敏性哮喘模型中的气道炎症和血清细胞间黏附分子-1表达。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025 Mar;13(3):e70160. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70160.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative Study of Practices and Challenges of Stepping Down Asthma Medication in Primary Care Across the UK.英国初级医疗中哮喘药物减量的实践与挑战的定性研究
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Oct 6;13:429-437. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S274943. eCollection 2020.
2
Health and cost impact of stepping down asthma medication for UK patients, 2001-2017: A population-based observational study.2001-2017 年英国患者降低哮喘药物治疗的健康和成本影响:基于人群的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003145. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Maintenance inhaler therapy preferences of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者维持吸入治疗偏好的离散选择实验。
Thorax. 2020 Sep;75(9):735-743. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213974. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Relative efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.吸入性皮质类固醇治疗哮喘患者的相对疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Aug;125(2):163-170.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
5
Asthma and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids: associations with hospitalisations with pneumonia.哮喘和吸入皮质类固醇治疗:与肺炎住院的关联。
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-1025-1.
6
Inhaled Corticosteroids And Risk Of Tuberculosis In Patients With Obstructive Lung Diseases: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Non-randomized Studies.吸入性皮质类固醇与阻塞性肺疾病患者结核病风险:非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 26;14:2219-2227. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S209273. eCollection 2019.
7
Oral steroid-sparing effect of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素在哮喘中的口服糖皮质激素节省效应
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jan 2;55(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01147-2019. Print 2020 Jan.
8
Inhaled Corticosteroids in Asthma and the Risk of Pneumonia.吸入性糖皮质激素与哮喘及肺炎风险
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019 Nov;11(6):795-805. doi: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.6.795.
9
Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management.系统文献综述:全身性皮质类固醇在哮喘管理中的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 1;201(3):276-293. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0903SO.
10
Changes in COPD inhaler prescriptions in the United Kingdom, 2000 to 2016.2000年至2016年英国慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入器处方的变化
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jan 22;14:279-287. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S190086. eCollection 2019.