Suppr超能文献

评估新生儿戒断综合征的定义。

Evaluating Definitions for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee;

Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Nashville, Tennessee; and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-007393. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

National estimates indicate that the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), a postnatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, increased more than fivefold between 2004 and 2016. There is no gold standard definition for capturing NAS across clinical, research, and public health settings. Our objective was to evaluate how different definitions of NAS modify the calculated incidence when applied to a known population of opioid-exposed infants.

METHODS

Data for this retrospective cohort study were obtained from opioid-exposed infants born at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2018. Six commonly used clinical and surveillance definitions of opioid exposure and NAS were applied to the study population and evaluated for accuracy in assessing clinical withdrawal.

RESULTS

A total of 121 opioid-exposed infants met the criteria for inclusion in our study. The proportion of infants who met criteria for NAS varied by predefined definition, ranging from 17.4% for infants who received morphine to 52.8% for infants with the diagnostic code for opioid exposure. Twenty-eight infants (23.1%) received a clinical diagnosis of NAS by a medical provider, and 38 (34.1%) received the diagnostic code for NAS at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant variability in the incidence of opioid exposure and NAS among a single-center population using 6 common definitions. Our findings suggest a need to develop a gold standard definition to be used across clinical, research, and public health surveillance settings.

摘要

背景与目的

全国范围内的数据表明,新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)的发病率,即产后阿片类药物戒断综合征,在 2004 年至 2016 年间增长了五倍以上。目前尚无用于在临床、研究和公共卫生环境中捕捉 NAS 的黄金标准定义。我们的目的是评估在应用于已知的阿片类药物暴露婴儿群体时,不同的 NAS 定义如何改变计算出的发病率。

方法

本回顾性队列研究的数据来自 2018 年在范德比尔特大学医学中心出生的阿片类药物暴露婴儿。将六种常用的临床和监测定义的阿片类药物暴露和 NAS 应用于研究人群,并评估其在评估临床戒断方面的准确性。

结果

共有 121 名阿片类药物暴露婴儿符合纳入本研究的标准。符合 NAS 标准的婴儿比例因预定义的定义而异,从接受吗啡的婴儿的 17.4%到有阿片类药物暴露诊断代码的婴儿的 52.8%不等。28 名婴儿(23.1%)由医疗提供者临床诊断为 NAS,38 名婴儿(34.1%)在出院时被诊断为 NAS。

结论

我们发现,在使用六种常见定义的单中心人群中,阿片类药物暴露和 NAS 的发病率存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,需要制定一个黄金标准定义,以便在临床、研究和公共卫生监测环境中使用。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Definitions for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.评估新生儿戒断综合征的定义。
Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-007393. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

5
Adverse Maternal Experiences and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.不良母婴经历与新生儿戒断综合征。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Mar;27(3):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03577-1. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
Intrauterine drug exposure as a risk factor for cerebral palsy.宫内药物暴露是脑瘫的一个危险因素。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Apr;64(4):453-461. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15050. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome In The United States, 2004-16.2004 - 2016年美国新生儿戒断综合征
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):764-767. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00814.
6
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;66(2):353-367. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.12.006.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验