Suppr超能文献

一种新型髓内钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉及InterTAN治疗股骨转子间骨折的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

作者信息

Wang ChaoFeng, Duan Ning, Li Zhong, Ma Teng, Zhang Kun, Wang Qian, Huang Qiang

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 23;12:1353677. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1353677. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Surgical treatment is the main treatment method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (FIFs), however, there are lots of implant-related complications after surgery. Our team designed a new intramedullary nail (NIN) to manage such fractures. The purpose of this study was to introduce this new implant and compare it with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN for treating FIFs. An AO/OTA 31-A1.3 FIF model was built and three fixation models were created via finite element method, comprising PFNA, InterTAN, and the NIN. Vertical, anteroposterior (A-P) bending, and torsional loads were simulated and applied to the three fixation models. Displacement and stress distribution were monitored. In order to compare PFNA and the NIN deeply, finite element testing was repeated for five times in vertical load case. The finite element analysis (FEA) data indicated that the NIN possessed the most outstanding mechanical properties among the three fixation models. The NIN model had lower maximal stress at implants compared to PFNA and InterTAN models under three load conditions. The trend of maximal stress at bones was similar to that of maximal stress at implants. Besides, the NIN model showed smaller maximal displacement compared with PFNA and InterTAN models under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. The trend for maximal displacement of fracture surface (MDFS) was almost identical with that of maximal displacement. In addition, there was significant difference between the PFNA and NIN groups in vertical load case ( < 0.05). Compared with PFNA and InterTAN, the NIN displayed the best mechanical properties for managing FIFs, including the lowest von Mises stress at implants and bones, and the smallest maximal displacement and MDFS under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. Therefore, this study might provide a new choice for patients with FIFs.

摘要

手术治疗是股骨转子间骨折(FIFs)的主要治疗方法,然而,术后存在许多与植入物相关的并发症。我们的团队设计了一种新型髓内钉(NIN)来治疗此类骨折。本研究的目的是介绍这种新型植入物,并将其与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)和InterTAN用于治疗FIFs进行比较。建立了AO/OTA 31 - A1.3 FIF模型,并通过有限元方法创建了三种固定模型,包括PFNA、InterTAN和NIN。对三种固定模型施加垂直、前后(A - P)弯曲和扭转载荷并进行模拟。监测位移和应力分布。为了深入比较PFNA和NIN,在垂直载荷情况下对有限元测试重复进行了五次。有限元分析(FEA)数据表明,在三种固定模型中,NIN具有最优异的力学性能。在三种载荷条件下,与PFNA和InterTAN模型相比,NIN模型植入物处的最大应力更低。骨骼处最大应力的趋势与植入物处最大应力的趋势相似。此外,在垂直、A - P弯曲和扭转载荷情况下,与PFNA和InterTAN模型相比,NIN模型的最大位移更小。骨折面最大位移(MDFS)的趋势与最大位移的趋势几乎相同。此外,在垂直载荷情况下,PFNA组和NIN组之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。与PFNA和InterTAN相比,NIN在治疗FIFs方面表现出最佳的力学性能,包括植入物和骨骼处最低的von Mises应力,以及在垂直、A - P弯曲和扭转载荷情况下最小的最大位移和MDFS。因此,本研究可能为FIFs患者提供一种新的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f1/10920256/2f77a0bcc6dd/fbioe-12-1353677-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验