• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神卫生机构中的火灾事件:实施无烟政策和允许使用不同类型电子烟的效果。

Fire Incidents in a Mental Health Setting: Effects of Implementing Smokefree Polices and Permitting the Use of Different Types of E-Cigarettes.

机构信息

Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.

South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238951.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17238951
PMID:33271985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7730299/
Abstract

Comprehensive smokefree policies in health care settings can have a positive impact on patients' smoking behaviour, but implementation is impeded by concern that surreptitious smoking may increase fire incidents. We investigated the incidence of routinely reported fire and false alarm incidents in a large mental health organisation in England over an 81-month period when different elements of a smokefree policy were implemented. We used negative binomial regression models to test associations between rates of fire and false alarm incidents and three hospital smokefree policy periods with mutual adjustment for occupied bed days: (1) an indoor policy which allowed disposable e-cigarettes; (2) a comprehensive policy which allowed disposable e-cigarettes; and (3) a comprehensive policy with all e-cigarette types allowed. We identified 90 fires and 200 false alarms. Fires decreased (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.72, = 0.004) and false alarms increased (IRR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.02-2.76, = 0.043), each by approximately two-thirds, when all e-cigarette types were allowed, after adjusting for bed occupancy and the comprehensive smokefree policy. Implementation of smokefree policies in mental health care settings that support use of all types of e-cigarettes may reduce fire risks, though measures to minimise effects of e-cigarette vapour on smoke detector systems may be needed to reduce false alarm incidents.

摘要

全面的无烟政策在医疗机构可以对患者的吸烟行为产生积极影响,但实施受到担忧的阻碍,即秘密吸烟可能会增加火灾事件。我们调查了在英格兰一个大型心理健康组织中,在实施不同无烟政策要素的 81 个月期间,常规报告的火灾和误报事件的发生率。我们使用负二项回归模型来测试火灾和误报事件发生率与三个医院无烟政策时期之间的关联,这些时期相互调整了占用床位天数:(1)允许使用一次性电子烟的室内政策;(2)允许使用一次性电子烟的综合政策;(3)允许所有电子烟类型的综合政策。我们确定了 90 起火灾和 200 起误报。当允许所有电子烟类型时,火灾减少(发病率比(IRR):0.35,95%置信区间:0.17-0.72, = 0.004),误报增加(IRR:1.67,95%置信区间:1.02-2.76, = 0.043),在调整床位占用和全面无烟政策后,这两个数字都约减少了三分之二。在心理健康保健环境中实施支持使用所有类型电子烟的无烟政策可能会降低火灾风险,但可能需要采取措施来最大程度地减少电子烟蒸汽对烟雾探测器系统的影响,以减少误报事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a952/7730299/633ece804a2a/ijerph-17-08951-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a952/7730299/047f0e975769/ijerph-17-08951-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a952/7730299/633ece804a2a/ijerph-17-08951-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a952/7730299/047f0e975769/ijerph-17-08951-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a952/7730299/633ece804a2a/ijerph-17-08951-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Fire Incidents in a Mental Health Setting: Effects of Implementing Smokefree Polices and Permitting the Use of Different Types of E-Cigarettes.精神卫生机构中的火灾事件:实施无烟政策和允许使用不同类型电子烟的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238951.
2
E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland.最近在监狱实施禁烟政策后电子烟的使用情况:一项在苏格兰被拘留者中进行的定性访谈研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 May 24;23(6):939-946. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa271.
3
Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance.精神科住院环境全面禁烟政策:实施国家指南前后混合方法评估的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3320-6.
4
Initial Views and Experiences of Vaping in Prisons: A Qualitative Study With People in Custody Preparing for the Imminent Implementation of Scotland's Prison Smokefree Policy.监狱中吸电子烟的初步看法和体验:一项在苏格兰监狱禁烟政策即将实施前对被羁押人员进行的定性研究
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(3):543-549. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa088.
5
Healthcare staff attitudes towards the use of electronic cigarettes ('e-cigarettes') compared with a local trust policy.与当地信托政策相比,医护人员对使用电子烟的态度。
Perspect Public Health. 2017 Jul;137(4):216-219. doi: 10.1177/1757913916659311. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems.价格和烟草控制政策对电子尼古丁传送系统需求的影响。
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii41-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051515.
7
Attitudes towards the New Zealand Government's Smokefree 2025 goal associated with smoking and vaping in university students aged 18 to 24 years: results of a 2018 national cross-sectional survey.18 至 24 岁大学生对新西兰政府 2025 年无烟目标的态度与吸烟和蒸气吸烟有关:2018 年全国横断面调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e037362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037362.
8
Use of electronic cigarettes in smoke-free environments.在无烟环境中使用电子烟。
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e19-e22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053118. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Supporting mental health service users to stop smoking: findings from a process evaluation of the implementation of smokefree policies into two mental health trusts.支持精神卫生服务使用者戒烟:对两家精神卫生信托机构实施无烟政策的过程评估结果
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):1619. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09673-7.
10
Smokefree home rules and cigarette smoking intensity among smokers in different stages of smoking cessation from 20 low-and-middle income countries.20 个中低收入国家处于不同戒烟阶段的吸烟者的无烟家庭规则和香烟吸食强度。
Prev Med. 2020 Mar;132:106000. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106000. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoking-related violence in a mental health setting following the implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy: A content analysis of incident reports.实施全面禁烟政策后精神卫生机构中与吸烟相关的暴力行为:事件报告的内容分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(2):202-211. doi: 10.1111/inm.12659. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy.一项电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808779. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Smoking and quitting behaviours by mental health conditions in Great Britain (1993-2014).
英国(1993-2014 年)心理健康状况与吸烟和戒烟行为。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance.精神科住院环境全面禁烟政策:实施国家指南前后混合方法评估的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3320-6.
5
Effect of implementation of a smoke-free policy on physical violence in a psychiatric inpatient setting: an interrupted time series analysis.无烟政策的实施对精神科住院环境中身体暴力的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;4(7):540-546. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30209-2. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Smoke-free mental health inpatient facility policies in Australia: variation across states and territories.澳大利亚无烟心理健康住院设施政策:各州和领地之间的差异
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Aug;41(4):329-332. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12649. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Becoming tobacco-free: Changes in staff and patient attitudes and incident reports in a large academic mental health and addictions hospital.实现无烟化:大型学术性心理健康与成瘾医院中工作人员和患者态度的变化及事件报告
Am J Addict. 2017 Mar;26(2):183-191. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12513. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes.香烟和不同类型电子烟对使用者的尼古丁输送情况。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Mar;234(5):773-779. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
Time to Smoke: Facilitating Smoking Breaks in Mental Health Inpatient Settings.吸烟时间:促进心理健康住院环境中的吸烟休息
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1794-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw103. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
E-cigarettes: the need for clear communication on relative risks.电子烟:明确传达相对风险的必要性。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00079-3. Epub 2015 Aug 31.