Huang Jidong, Tauras John, Chaloupka Frank J
Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii41-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051515.
While much is known about the demand for conventional cigarettes, little is known about the determinants of demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS or e-cigarettes). The goal of this study is to estimate the own and cross-price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes and to examine the impact of cigarette prices and smoke-free policies on e-cigarette sales.
Quarterly e-cigarette prices and sales and conventional cigarette prices from 2009 to 2012 were constructed from commercial retail store scanner data from 52 U.S. markets, for food, drug and mass stores, and from 25 markets, for convenience stores. Fixed-effects models were used to estimate the own and cross-price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes and associations between e-cigarette sales and cigarette prices and smoke-free policies.
Estimated own price elasticities for disposable e-cigarettes centred around -1.2, while those for reusable e-cigarettes were approximately -1.9. Disposable e-cigarette sales were higher in markets where reusable e-cigarette prices were higher and where less of the population was covered by a comprehensive smoke-free policy. There were no consistent and statistically significant relationships between cigarette prices and e-cigarette sales.
E-cigarette sales are very responsive to own price changes. Disposable e-cigarettes appear to be substitutes for reusable e-cigarettes. Policies increasing e-cigarette retail prices, such as limiting rebates, discounts and coupons and imposing a tax on e-cigarettes, could potentially lead to significant reductions in e-cigarette sales. Differential tax policies based on product type could lead to substitution between different types of e-cigarettes.
尽管人们对传统香烟的需求了解颇多,但对于电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS,即电子烟)需求的决定因素却知之甚少。本研究的目的是估计电子烟需求的自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性,并考察香烟价格和无烟政策对电子烟销售的影响。
2009年至2012年的季度电子烟价格、销售量以及传统香烟价格,是根据美国52个食品、药品和大型商店市场以及25个便利店市场的商业零售商店扫描数据构建而成的。使用固定效应模型来估计电子烟需求的自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性,以及电子烟销售与香烟价格和无烟政策之间的关联。
一次性电子烟的估计自身价格弹性集中在-1.2左右,而可重复使用电子烟的自身价格弹性约为-1.9。在可重复使用电子烟价格较高且较少人口受全面无烟政策覆盖的市场中,一次性电子烟的销量更高。香烟价格与电子烟销售之间没有一致且具有统计学意义的关系。
电子烟销售对自身价格变化反应非常灵敏。一次性电子烟似乎是可重复使用电子烟的替代品。提高电子烟零售价格的政策,如限制回扣、折扣和优惠券以及对电子烟征税,可能会导致电子烟销量大幅下降。基于产品类型的差异化税收政策可能会导致不同类型电子烟之间的替代。