• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

读写的非对称性实践塑造了视空间注意力和辨别力。

Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination.

机构信息

William James Center for Research, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim Do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal.

Iscte, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Cis-Iscte, Av. Das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0
PMID:33273618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7713386/
Abstract

Movement is generally conceived of as unfolding laterally in the writing direction that one is socialized into. In 'Western' languages, this is a left-to-right bias contributing to an imbalance in how attention is distributed across space. We propose that the rightward attentional bias exercises an additional unidirectional influence on discrimination performance thus shaping the congruency effect typically observed in Posner-inspired cueing tasks. In two studies, we test whether faces averted laterally serve as attention orienting cues and generate differences in both target discrimination latencies and gaze movements across left and right hemifields. Results systematically show that right-facing faces (i.e. aligned with the script direction) give rise to an advantage for cue-target pairs pertaining to the right (versus left) side of space. We report an asymmetry between congruent conditions in the form of right-sided facilitation for: (a) response time in discrimination decisions (experiment 1-2) and (b) eye-gaze movements, namely earlier onset to first fixation in the respective region of interest (experiment 2). Left and front facing cues generated virtually equal exploration patterns, confirming that the latter did not prime any directionality. These findings demonstrate that visuospatial attention and consequent discrimination are highly dependent on the asymmetric practices of reading and writing.

摘要

运动通常被认为是在个体所接受的书写方向上横向展开的。在“西方”语言中,这种从左到右的偏见导致了注意力在空间上的分布不平衡。我们提出,右向注意力偏差对辨别性能产生额外的单向影响,从而塑造了在基于 Posner 的线索任务中通常观察到的一致性效应。在两项研究中,我们测试了侧向回避的面孔是否作为注意定向线索,并在左、右半视野中产生了目标辨别潜伏期和注视运动的差异。结果系统地表明,右侧朝向的面孔(即与书写方向一致)会导致与空间右侧(相对于左侧)相关的线索-目标对产生优势。我们报告了在一致性条件下的一种不对称性,表现为:(a)辨别决策的反应时(实验 1-2)和(b)眼动,即在相应的兴趣区域中首次注视的起始时间更早(实验 2)。左向和正向的线索产生了几乎相同的探索模式,这证实了后者没有引发任何方向性。这些发现表明,视空间注意和随后的辨别高度依赖于阅读和书写的不对称实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/13c6ff630f8c/41598_2020_78080_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/368770e74289/41598_2020_78080_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/0127ae90c6a9/41598_2020_78080_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/848e2227a718/41598_2020_78080_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/29d055cc4dfe/41598_2020_78080_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/ee2d59ab91ec/41598_2020_78080_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/13c6ff630f8c/41598_2020_78080_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/368770e74289/41598_2020_78080_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/0127ae90c6a9/41598_2020_78080_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/848e2227a718/41598_2020_78080_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/29d055cc4dfe/41598_2020_78080_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/ee2d59ab91ec/41598_2020_78080_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2481/7713386/13c6ff630f8c/41598_2020_78080_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination.读写的非对称性实践塑造了视空间注意力和辨别力。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0.
2
Two Cultural Processing Asymmetries Drive Spatial Attention.两种文化加工不对称性驱动空间注意力。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Aug;46(8):e13185. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13185.
3
Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.通过视动刺激确定注意和参照编码源对 Simon 效应的优先性。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):1011-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.025. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
4
Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.与眼球线索触发的注意定向相关的神经活动:一项侧化 ERP 的研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(3):285-95. doi: 10.1080/17470910903422819. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
5
Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者对他人目光的自动注意定向
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1549-1558. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1192658. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.探究上肢伸展任务中注视线索化注意的促进和抑制的时间进程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2410-2423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01821-5.
7
Responding to the direction of the eyes: in search of the masked gaze-cueing effect.对眼睛方向的反应:探寻隐蔽的注视线索效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):148-61. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0570-6.
8
A direct link between gaze perception and social attention.目光感知与社会注意力之间的直接联系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):634-44. doi: 10.1037/a0020559.
9
Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.通过注视和箭头线索进行的视觉空间注意转移:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:123-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.091. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
10
Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture.会说话的头部还是会说话的眼睛?头部朝向和突然出现的注视线索对注意力捕捉的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):1-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Gazing left, gazing right: exploring a spatial bias in social attention.左顾右盼:探索社会注意力的空间偏向。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 12;11:e15694. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15694. eCollection 2023.
2
Hemispheric functional segregation facilitates target detection during sustained visuospatial attention.大脑半球功能分工有助于在持续的视空间注意力中进行目标检测。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Oct 15;43(15):4529-4539. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25970. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral biases in aesthetic and spatial location judgments: differences between tasks and native reading directions.审美和空间位置判断的横向偏差:任务和母语阅读方向之间的差异。
Laterality. 2020 Jan;25(1):5-21. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1577433. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
The first, the least and the last: Spatial asymmetries in memory and their relation to script trajectory.先、少、后:记忆中的空间不对称及其与书写轨迹的关系。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):229-239. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0861-1.
3
Scanning of speechless comics changes spatial biases in mental model construction.
无声漫画的扫描改变了心理模型构建中的空间偏差。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0130.
4
Attentional asymmetry between visual hemifields is related to habitual direction of reading and its implications for debate on cause and effects of dyslexia.视觉半视野之间的注意不对称与阅读习惯方向有关,及其对诵读困难因果关系辩论的启示。
Dyslexia. 2018 Feb;24(1):33-43. doi: 10.1002/dys.1574. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Infants learn better from left to right: a directional bias in infants' sequence learning.婴儿从左到右学习得更好:婴儿序列学习中的方向性偏见。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 26;7(1):2437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02466-w.
6
The dynamic effect of reading direction habit on spatial asymmetry of image perception.阅读方向习惯对图像感知空间不对称性的动态影响。
J Vis. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):8. doi: 10.1167/16.11.8.
7
Hemispheric asymmetry: Looking for a novel signature of the modulation of spatial attention in multisensory processing.半球不对称性:探寻多感官加工中空间注意力调制的新特征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):690-707. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1154-y.
8
Number-space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and non-human animal species.无语言的数字-空间关联:来自前语言人类婴儿和非人类动物物种的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):352-369. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1126-2.
9
Does Target Object Processing Affect Reaction Times in Simple Detection Spatial Cueing Tasks?目标对象处理是否会影响简单检测空间线索任务中的反应时间?
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Apr;122(2):395-410. doi: 10.1177/0031512516639800. Epub 2016 Mar 27.
10
Embodiment of abstract categories in space… grounding or mere compatibility effects? The case of politics.抽象范畴在空间中的体现……是基础效应还是仅仅是兼容性效应?以政治为例。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 May;166:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 1.