• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.运用罗伯逊分类法解释剖宫产率的波动。
J Pregnancy. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2793296. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793296. eCollection 2020.
2
Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.立陶宛采用罗布森十组分类系统的剖宫产率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2015 Nov;51(5):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice.采用罗伯逊的 10 分组分类系统在巴西私人执业中实现适当的剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05803-2.
4
Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.利用罗伯逊的十分组分类系统和其他社会人口学及临床变量对 CS 率进行医院间比较的风险调整模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 21;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-54.
5
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.迈向更好的审计:除剖宫产外的其他结局的 Robson Ten 分组分类系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
7
Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.剖宫产的罗布森分类:对尼日利亚一家私立三级医院降低剖宫产率的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x.
8
Trends in caesarean section rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 using Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Euro-Peristat study.2015 年至 2019 年欧洲采用 Robson's Ten Group Classification System 的剖宫产率趋势:一项 Euro-Peristat 研究。
BJOG. 2024 Mar;131(4):444-454. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17670. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
9
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.剖宫产率:在澳大利亚一所三级医院应用改良的 Robson 十组分类法。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.
10
Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.西班牙某大学附属医院应用罗伯逊分类系统分析剖宫产率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 29;17(5):1575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051575.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.在一家西班牙三级医院应用改良的十组罗布森分类法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):252. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010252.
2
Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.采用改良 Robson 十组分类系统调查罗马尼亚未成年母亲剖宫产术实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010727.

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean section on a rise-Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study.剖宫产率上升——高龄产妇是主要原因吗?一项基于人群登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0210655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210655. eCollection 2019.
2
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
3
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
4
Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic.遏制全球剖宫产流行趋势。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32394-8.
5
The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking.十组分类系统——一种新的思维方式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.026.
6
Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System.2005 年至 2014 年美国的剖宫产术:使用 Robson 10 组分类系统的基于人群的分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):105.e1-105.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.罗伯逊分类法在临床实践中的应用:立陶宛的经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1625-9.
8
EBCOG position statement on caesarean section in Europe.欧洲妇产科和产科学会(EBCOG)关于欧洲剖宫产的立场声明。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Dec;219:129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries.剖宫产10组分类系统的最佳实践建议。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;135(2):232-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
10
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

运用罗伯逊分类法解释剖宫产率的波动。

Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.

机构信息

Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology & Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 Brussels 1090, Belgium.

MSPT Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology, Koning Albert II laan 35 Brussels 1030, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pregnancy. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2793296. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793296. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/2793296
PMID:33274077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7679201/
Abstract

PURPOSE

As the rate of cesarean sections (CS) continues to rise in Flanders (northern part of Belgium), it is important to understand the reasons behind this evolution and to find ways to achieve appropriate CS rates. For this analysis, we categorized CS changes between 1992 and 2016, applying the Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS). We also applied the TGCS to analyze the information of the only clinics where between 2008 and 2016, the absolute CS rate had fallen by more than two percent.

METHODS

This paper is based on a population-based cross-sectional study. Robson's TGCS was used to analyze CS rates for the years 1992, 2000, 2008, and 2016, using the Flemish population-based birth register.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 2016, the overall CS rate increased from 11.8% in 1992 to 20.9% in 2016. The major contributors to that increase were (a) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in spontaneous labor (Robson group 1); (b) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in induced labor or CS before labor (group 2); and (c) multiparous women with single cephalic at term pregnancy with history of CS (group 5). In the subgroup of the seven clinics where the collective CS rate had decreased from 23.2% in 2008 to 19.3% in 2016, the main contributors to this decrease were Robson groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The CS increase in Flanders between 1992 and 2016 is mainly the result of the absolute CS increase in the childbirth of nulliparous women with a single cephalic baby at term in spontaneous or induced labor and in women with a single cephalic presentation at term and a previous CS. Further research in these aforementioned groups is needed to identify the real reasons for the CS increase.

摘要

目的

随着弗拉芒地区(比利时北部)剖宫产率的持续上升,了解这一演变的原因并寻找适当的剖宫产率方法非常重要。为此,我们应用罗伯逊 10 组分类系统(TGCS)对 1992 年至 2016 年的剖宫产变化进行了分类。我们还应用 TGCS 分析了 2008 年至 2016 年间绝对剖宫产率下降超过 2%的唯一几家诊所的信息。

方法

本研究基于一项基于人群的横断面研究。使用弗拉芒基于人群的出生登记处,罗伯逊的 TGCS 分析了 1992 年、2000 年、2008 年和 2016 年的剖宫产率。

结果

1992 年至 2016 年间,总体剖宫产率从 1992 年的 11.8%上升至 2016 年的 20.9%。导致这一增长的主要原因是:(a)足月自然分娩的单胎初产妇(罗伯逊 1 组);(b)足月引产或剖宫产前的单胎初产妇(罗伯逊 2 组);(c)有剖宫产史的足月单胎初产妇(罗伯逊 5 组)。在 7 家诊所的亚组中,2008 年至 2016 年的集体剖宫产率从 23.2%下降至 19.3%,这一下降的主要原因是罗伯逊 1 组和 2 组。

结论

1992 年至 2016 年弗拉芒地区剖宫产率的上升主要是由于足月自然分娩或引产的单胎初产妇剖宫产率绝对上升,以及足月单胎初产妇和有剖宫产史的孕妇剖宫产率上升所致。需要对上述群体进行进一步研究,以确定剖宫产率上升的真正原因。