Université de Paris Cité, Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique (EPOPé), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM U1153, INRA, Paris, France.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
BJOG. 2024 Mar;131(4):444-454. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17670. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
To assess changes in caesarean section (CS) rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 and utilise the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) to evaluate the contribution of different obstetric populations to overall CS rates and trends.
Observational study utilising routine birth registry data.
A total of 28 European countries.
Births at ≥22 weeks of gestation in 2015 and 2019.
Using a federated model, individual-level data from routine sources in each country were formatted to a common data model and transformed into anonymised, aggregated data.
By country: overall CS rate. For TGCS groups (by country): CS rate, relative size, relative and absolute contribution to overall CS rate.
Among the 28 European countries, both the CS rates (2015, 16.0%-55.9%; 2019, 16.0%-52.2%) and the trends varied (from -3.7% to +4.7%, with decreased rates in nine countries, maintained rates in seven countries (≤ ± 0.2) and with increasing rates in 12 countries). Using the TGCS (for 17 countries), in most countries labour induction increased (groups 2a and 4a), whereas multiple pregnancies (group 8) decreased. In countries with decreasing overall CS rates, CS tended to decrease across all TGCS groups, whereas in countries with increasing rates, CS tended to increase in most groups. In countries with the greatest increase in CS rates (>1%), the absolute contributions of groups 1 (nulliparous term cephalic singletons, spontaneous labour), 2a and 4a (induction of labour), 2b and 4b (prelabour CS) and 10 (preterm cephalic singletons) to the overall CS rate tended to increase.
The TGCS shows varying CS trends and rates among countries of Europe. Comparisons between European countries, particularly those with differing trends, could provide insight into strategies to reduce CS without clinical indication.
评估 2015 年至 2019 年欧洲剖宫产率的变化,并利用罗伯逊十组分类系统(TGCS)评估不同产科人群对总剖宫产率和趋势的贡献。
利用常规出生登记数据进行观察性研究。
共 28 个欧洲国家。
2015 年和 2019 年≥22 周妊娠分娩。
使用联邦模型,从每个国家的常规来源获取个体水平数据,并将其格式化为通用数据模型,并转换为匿名、汇总数据。
按国家:总剖宫产率。对于 TGCS 组(按国家):剖宫产率、相对大小、对总剖宫产率的相对和绝对贡献。
在 28 个欧洲国家中,剖宫产率(2015 年 16.0%-55.9%;2019 年 16.0%-52.2%)和趋势均有所不同(从-3.7%到+4.7%,9 个国家下降,7 个国家保持不变(≤±0.2),12 个国家上升)。使用 TGCS(17 个国家),在大多数国家中,引产增加(2a 组和 4a 组),而多胎妊娠(8 组)减少。在剖宫产总体下降的国家中,剖宫产率在所有 TGCS 组中均呈下降趋势,而在剖宫产率上升的国家中,剖宫产率在大多数组中均呈上升趋势。在剖宫产率上升幅度最大(>1%)的国家中,TGCS 组 1(无指征足月头位单胎、自发性分娩)、2a 和 4a(引产)、2b 和 4b(产前期剖宫产)和 10(早产头位单胎)对总剖宫产率的绝对贡献有增加的趋势。
TGCS 显示了欧洲国家剖宫产率的不同趋势和水平。欧洲国家之间的比较,特别是那些具有不同趋势的国家之间的比较,可以深入了解在没有临床指征的情况下降低剖宫产率的策略。