Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine.
Research Project Manager, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine.
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Nov 30;16:11034. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11034.
It is crucial that residents learn in environments that are psychologically safe and free of morale-harming rumors. This workshop introduced the Ladder of Inference as a means for programs to foster psychological safety, mitigate against rumors, and increase trust.
Residents and faculty of two residency programs (cohorts A and B) were introduced to the Ladder of Inference. After an interactive discussion, small groups applied the concept to engaging, highly relevant hypothetical situations. Debriefing and reflection followed the group work. Finally, attendees completed an assessment of the workshop's effectiveness (10 7-point questions) and their satisfaction (one 7-point question).
Seventeen residents from cohort A completed the workshop, and 15 completed the assessment (response rate: 88%). Participants found it favorable ( = 65.9 out of 70) and satisfactory (6.3 out of 7). Twenty-eight residents and faculty from cohort B completed the workshop, and 15 completed the assessment (response rate: 54%). Cohort B participants also found the workshop favorable ( = 64.8) and satisfactory (6.8). Both cohorts felt the workshop was effective in helping them understand the concept of the Ladder of Inference (6.5 for both cohorts) and would provide value in their residency program in the future (6.1 for cohort A, 6.7 for cohort B) and at other organizations (6.3 for cohort A, 6.7 for cohort B).
This workshop is an effective method whereby participants can develop and apply an understanding of the Ladder of Inference. This shared understanding can promote trust and enhance the resilience of a program.
在心理安全且没有士气低落谣言的环境中学习对住院医师来说至关重要。本工作坊介绍了推理层次作为一种促进心理安全、减少谣言和增加信任的方法。
两个住院医师培训项目(A 组和 B 组)的住院医师和教员都参加了推理层次介绍。在互动讨论之后,小组成员将该概念应用于参与高度相关的假设情况。小组工作后进行了汇报和反思。最后,与会者完成了对工作坊效果(10 个 7 分制问题)和满意度(1 个 7 分制问题)的评估。
A 组 17 名住院医师完成了工作坊,15 名住院医师完成了评估(回应率:88%)。参与者认为该工作坊很受欢迎(=70 分中的 65.9 分),并且很满意(=7 分中的 6.3 分)。B 组 28 名住院医师和教员参加了工作坊,15 名住院医师完成了评估(回应率:54%)。B 组的参与者也认为工作坊很受欢迎(=70 分中的 64.8 分),并且很满意(=7 分中的 6.8 分)。两个组都认为工作坊有助于他们理解推理层次的概念(两个组的评分均为 6.5),并且在未来的住院医师培训项目中以及在其他组织中具有价值(A 组的评分为 6.1,B 组的评分为 6.7)。
本工作坊是一种有效的方法,可以帮助参与者发展和应用对推理层次的理解。这种共同的理解可以促进信任并增强项目的适应能力。