Cho Jungheum, Kim Jihang, Lee Kyong Joon, Nam Chang Mo, Yoon Sung Hyun, Song Hwayoung, Kim Junghoon, Choi Ye Ra, Lee Kyung Hee, Lee Kyung Won
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.
AI Research Group, Monitor Corporation, Seoul 06628, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 2;9(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123908.
We aimed to analyse the CT examinations of the previous screening round (CT) in NLST participants with incidence lung cancer and evaluate the value of DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. Thoracic radiologists reviewed CT in participants with incidence lung cancer, and a DL-CAD analysed CT according to NLST criteria and the lung CT screening reporting & data system (Lung-RADS) classification. We calculated patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities of the DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. As per the NLST criteria, 88% (100/113) of CT were positive and 74 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 98% (98/100) of the positive screens as positive and detected 95% (70/74) of the missed lung cancers. As per the Lung-RADS classification, 82% (93/113) of CT were positive and 60 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 97% (90/93) of the positive screens as positive and detected 98% (59/60) of the missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD made false positive calls in 10.3% (27/263) of controls, with 0.16 false positive nodules per scan (41/263). In conclusion, the majority of CT in participants with incidence lung cancers had missed lung cancers, and the DL-CAD detected them with high sensitivity and a limited false positive rate.
我们旨在分析国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)参与者中既往筛查轮次(CT)的CT检查结果,这些参与者患有原发性肺癌,并评估双能量计算机辅助检测(DL-CAD)在检测漏诊肺癌方面的价值。胸部放射科医生对患有原发性肺癌的参与者的CT进行了复查,DL-CAD则根据NLST标准和肺部CT筛查报告与数据系统(Lung-RADS)分类对CT进行了分析。我们计算了DL-CAD在检测漏诊肺癌方面的患者层面和病灶层面的敏感性。根据NLST标准,88%(100/113)的CT呈阳性,其中74例存在漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD将98%(98/100)的阳性筛查报告为阳性,并检测出95%(70/74)的漏诊肺癌。根据Lung-RADS分类,82%(93/113)的CT呈阳性,其中60例存在漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD将97%(90/93)的阳性筛查报告为阳性,并检测出98%(59/60)的漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD在10.3%(27/263)的对照中出现假阳性结果,每次扫描的假阳性结节为0.16个(41/263)。总之,患有原发性肺癌的参与者中,大多数CT存在漏诊肺癌的情况,而DL-CAD能够以高敏感性和有限的假阳性率检测出这些漏诊肺癌。