Suppr超能文献

国家肺癌筛查试验中CT筛查阴性后的肺癌发病率:基于深度学习的漏诊肺癌检测

Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers.

作者信息

Cho Jungheum, Kim Jihang, Lee Kyong Joon, Nam Chang Mo, Yoon Sung Hyun, Song Hwayoung, Kim Junghoon, Choi Ye Ra, Lee Kyung Hee, Lee Kyung Won

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.

AI Research Group, Monitor Corporation, Seoul 06628, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 2;9(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123908.

Abstract

We aimed to analyse the CT examinations of the previous screening round (CT) in NLST participants with incidence lung cancer and evaluate the value of DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. Thoracic radiologists reviewed CT in participants with incidence lung cancer, and a DL-CAD analysed CT according to NLST criteria and the lung CT screening reporting & data system (Lung-RADS) classification. We calculated patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities of the DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. As per the NLST criteria, 88% (100/113) of CT were positive and 74 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 98% (98/100) of the positive screens as positive and detected 95% (70/74) of the missed lung cancers. As per the Lung-RADS classification, 82% (93/113) of CT were positive and 60 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 97% (90/93) of the positive screens as positive and detected 98% (59/60) of the missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD made false positive calls in 10.3% (27/263) of controls, with 0.16 false positive nodules per scan (41/263). In conclusion, the majority of CT in participants with incidence lung cancers had missed lung cancers, and the DL-CAD detected them with high sensitivity and a limited false positive rate.

摘要

我们旨在分析国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)参与者中既往筛查轮次(CT)的CT检查结果,这些参与者患有原发性肺癌,并评估双能量计算机辅助检测(DL-CAD)在检测漏诊肺癌方面的价值。胸部放射科医生对患有原发性肺癌的参与者的CT进行了复查,DL-CAD则根据NLST标准和肺部CT筛查报告与数据系统(Lung-RADS)分类对CT进行了分析。我们计算了DL-CAD在检测漏诊肺癌方面的患者层面和病灶层面的敏感性。根据NLST标准,88%(100/113)的CT呈阳性,其中74例存在漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD将98%(98/100)的阳性筛查报告为阳性,并检测出95%(70/74)的漏诊肺癌。根据Lung-RADS分类,82%(93/113)的CT呈阳性,其中60例存在漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD将97%(90/93)的阳性筛查报告为阳性,并检测出98%(59/60)的漏诊肺癌。DL-CAD在10.3%(27/263)的对照中出现假阳性结果,每次扫描的假阳性结节为0.16个(41/263)。总之,患有原发性肺癌的参与者中,大多数CT存在漏诊肺癌的情况,而DL-CAD能够以高敏感性和有限的假阳性率检测出这些漏诊肺癌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fceb/7759925/a1a666037f5d/jcm-09-03908-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验