Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Program in Neurosciences & Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Autism Research Center, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiliation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Program in Neurosciences & Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Autism Research Center, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiliation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Aug;6(8):825-836. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is classically associated with poor emotional face processing. Few studies, however, have used more ecological dynamic stimuli. We contrasted functional magnetic resonance imaging measures of dynamic emotional face processing in ASD and typically developing (TD) cohorts across a wide age range to determine if the processing and age-related trajectories differed between participants with and without ASD.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging data collected from 200 participants (5-42 years old; 107 in ASD cohort, 93 in TD cohort) during the presentation of dynamic emotional faces (neutral-to-happy, neutral-to-angry) and dynamic flowers (closed-to-open) were analyzed. Group differences and group-by-age interactions in the faces versus flowers and between emotion contrasts were investigated.
Differences in activation between dynamic faces and flowers in occipital regions, including the fusiform gyri, were reduced in the ASD group. Contrasting the two emotions, ASD compared with TD participants showed increased engagement of the precentral, postcentral, and superior temporal gyri to happy faces and increased activation to angry faces occipitally. Emotion processing regions, such as insula, temporal pole, and frontal regions, showed increased recruitment with age to happy faces compared with both angry faces and flowers in the TD group, but decreased recruitment with age in the ASD group.
Using dynamic stimuli, we demonstrated that participants with ASD processed faces similarly to nonface stimuli, and age-related atypicalities were more pronounced to happy faces in participants with ASD. We demonstrated emotion-specific atypicalities in a large group of participants with ASD that underscore persistent difficulties from childhood into mid-adulthood.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)通常与较差的情绪面孔处理能力有关。然而,很少有研究使用更具生态性的动态刺激。我们对比了 ASD 和典型发育(TD)队列在广泛年龄范围内的动态情绪面孔处理的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量值,以确定 ASD 患者和非 ASD 患者之间的处理和与年龄相关的轨迹是否存在差异。
我们分析了 200 名参与者(年龄 5-42 岁;ASD 组 107 人,TD 组 93 人)在呈现动态情绪面孔(从中性到高兴,从中性到生气)和动态花朵(从闭合到开放)时的 fMRI 数据。我们研究了面孔与花朵之间以及在情绪对比之间的组间差异和组-年龄交互作用。
与 TD 组相比,ASD 组在枕叶区域(包括梭状回)中,动态面孔与花朵之间的激活差异减少。与 TD 组相比,ASD 组在对比两种情绪时,对高兴面孔的中央前回、中央后回和颞上回的参与度增加,对生气面孔的枕叶激活增加。情绪处理区域,如岛叶、颞极和额区,在 TD 组中,与生气面孔和花朵相比,随着年龄的增长,对高兴面孔的招募增加,但在 ASD 组中,随着年龄的增长,招募减少。
使用动态刺激,我们证明了 ASD 患者对面孔的处理方式与非面孔刺激相似,并且与年龄相关的异常在 ASD 患者中对高兴面孔更为明显。我们在一大群 ASD 患者中展示了特定于情绪的异常,这些异常强调了从儿童期到成年中期持续存在的困难。