Yale Global Health Leadership Initiative, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 6;21(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01332-5.
Despite calls for improved accountability in global health systems, and a set of clear and consistent theoretical accountability frameworks, empirical descriptions of how accountability is experienced and enacted in low- and middle- income country (LMIC) settings is limited. Therefore, we sought to characterize how managers at all levels of Ethiopia's primary healthcare system experience accountability in their daily practice.
We conducted in-depth key informant interviews with 41 key stakeholders across 4 regions (Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples, and Tigray) in the context of the Primary Healthcare Transformation Initiative (PTI). Consistent with the principles of grounded theory, our team used the constant comparative method to identify emergent themes related to concrete areas that could be targeted to allow an overall culture of accountability to flourish.
Emergent themes were: development of a shared understanding of system-wide accountability, streamlining of managerial reporting lines, strengthening of medico-legal knowledge and systems, and development of mechanisms for bottom-up accountability.
Findings may be valuable to policymakers seeking to create more effective national accountability frameworks; practitioners and development partners seeking to strengthen implementation of evidence-based accountability systems and practices; and researchers aiming to develop meaningful, practical measures of accountability in public health.
尽管全球卫生系统呼吁提高问责制,并且有一套明确和一致的理论问责制框架,但在中低收入国家(LMIC)环境中,对问责制的经验和实施情况的实证描述有限。因此,我们试图描述埃塞俄比亚初级卫生保健系统各级管理人员在日常实践中如何体验问责制。
我们在初级卫生保健转型倡议(PTI)的背景下,在 4 个地区(阿姆哈拉、奥罗莫、南部民族和人民以及提格雷)对 41 名利益攸关方进行了深入的关键信息采访。根据扎根理论的原则,我们的团队使用恒定性比较方法确定了与具体领域相关的新兴主题,这些主题可以作为目标,以促进整体问责文化的繁荣。
出现的主题包括:对全系统问责制的共同理解的发展、简化管理报告线、加强医疗法律知识和系统,以及开发自下而上问责制的机制。
这些发现对于寻求建立更有效的国家问责制框架的政策制定者、寻求加强循证问责制系统和实践实施的从业者和发展伙伴以及旨在制定公共卫生领域有意义、实用的问责制衡量标准的研究人员可能具有价值。