School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, Private Bag X17, Cape Town, 7535, South Africa.
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 1;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01229-w.
Public primary health care and district health systems play important roles in expanding healthcare access and promoting equity. This study explored and described accountability for this mandate as perceived and experienced by frontline health managers and providers involved in delivering maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services in a rural South African health district.
This was a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 58 frontline public sector health managers and providers in the district office and two sub-districts, examining the meanings of accountability and related lived experiences. A thematic analysis approach grounded in descriptive phenomenology was used to identify the main themes and organise the findings.
Accountability was described by respondents as both an organisational mechanism of answerability and responsibility and an intrinsic professional virtue. Accountability relationships were understood to be multidirectional - upwards and downwards in hierarchies, outwards to patients and communities, and inwards to the 'self'. The practice of accountability was seen as constrained by organisational environments where impunity and unfair punishment existed alongside each other, where political connections limited the ability to sanction and by climates of fear and blame. Accountability was seen as enabled by open management styles, teamwork, good relationships between primary health care, hospital services and communities, investment in knowledge and skills development and responsive support systems. The interplay of these constraints and enablers varied across the facilities and sub-districts studied.
Providers and managers have well-established ideas about, and a language of, accountability. The lived reality of accountability by frontline managers and providers varies and is shaped by micro-configurations of enablers and constraints in local accountability ecosystems. A 'just culture', teamwork and collaboration between primary health care and hospitals and community participation were seen as promoting accountability, enabling collective responsibility, a culture of learning rather than blame, and ultimately, access to and quality of care.
公共初级卫生保健和地区卫生系统在扩大医疗服务可及性和促进公平方面发挥着重要作用。本研究探讨并描述了参与提供母婴、新生儿和儿童健康 (MNCH) 服务的一线卫生管理人员和提供者对这一任务的问责制的看法和经验,该研究在南非一个农村地区卫生区进行。
这是一项定性研究,对该地区办公室和两个分区的 58 名一线公共部门卫生管理人员和提供者进行了深入访谈,探讨了问责制的含义和相关的生活经历。采用扎根于描述现象学的主题分析方法,确定了主要主题并组织了研究结果。
受访者将问责制描述为一种组织责任制和责任制,也是一种内在的职业道德。问责制关系被理解为多向的——在等级制度中向上和向下、向患者和社区向外、向“自我”向内。问责制的实践被认为受到组织环境的限制,在这种环境中,有罪不罚和不公正的惩罚并存,政治关系限制了制裁的能力,并且存在恐惧和指责的氛围。开放的管理风格、团队合作、初级卫生保健、医院服务和社区之间的良好关系、对知识和技能发展的投资以及响应性的支持系统被视为使问责制成为可能。这些制约因素和促进因素的相互作用在研究的各个设施和分区中有所不同。
提供者和管理人员对问责制有明确的概念和语言。一线管理人员和提供者的问责制的实际情况因当地问责制生态系统中激励因素和制约因素的微观配置而异。“公正文化”、初级卫生保健与医院之间的团队合作和协作以及社区参与被视为促进问责制、使集体责任、学习文化而不是指责文化、最终促进和提高护理质量成为可能。