• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业技术采用补贴:来自乌干达一项关于改良谷物储存袋的随机试验的证据。

Subsidies for Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Improved Grain Storage Bags in Uganda.

作者信息

Omotilewa Oluwatoba J, Ricker-Gilbert Jacob, Ainembabazi John Herbert

机构信息

Development Economics Data Group at the World Bank.

Agricultural Economics at Purdue University.

出版信息

Am J Agric Econ. 2019 Feb 21;101(3):753-772. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aay108.

DOI:10.1093/ajae/aay108
PMID:33281194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7714250/
Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether subsidizing an entirely new agricultural technology for smallholder farmers can aid its adoption early in the diffusion process. Based on a theoretical framework for technology adoption under subjective uncertainty, we implemented a randomized field experiment among 1,200 smallholders in Uganda to estimate the extent to which subsidizing an improved grain storage bag crowds-out or crowds-in commercial buying of the technology. The empirical results show that on average, subsidized households are more likely to buy an additional bag at commercial prices relative to the households with no subsidy who are equally aware of the technology. This suggests that under certain circumstances, such as when there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of a new agricultural technology, and the private sector market for the technology is weak or nascent, a one-time use of subsidy to build awareness and reduce risk can help generate demand for the new technology and thus crowd-in commercial demand for it. In this context, a subsidy can allow farmers to experiment with the technology and learn from the experience before investing in it. JEL codes: C23, C93, O33, Q12, Q18.

摘要

本文探讨了为小农户补贴一项全新农业技术是否有助于在技术传播初期促进其采用的问题。基于主观不确定性下技术采用的理论框架,我们在乌干达的1200名小农户中开展了一项随机实地实验,以估计补贴一种改良型谷物储存袋在多大程度上挤出或吸引了对该技术的商业购买。实证结果表明,平均而言,与同样知晓该技术但未获补贴的农户相比,获得补贴的农户更有可能按商业价格额外购买一个袋子。这表明,在某些情况下,比如当一项新农业技术的有效性存在不确定性,且该技术的私营部门市场薄弱或尚处于萌芽阶段时,一次性使用补贴来提高认知度和降低风险有助于创造对新技术的需求,从而吸引对其的商业需求。在此背景下,补贴可以让农民在投资该技术之前先试用并从经验中学习。《经济文献杂志》分类号:C23、C93、O33、Q12、Q18。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/b88a0838c4a4/AJAE-101-03-753-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/9ec763bb6f46/AJAE-101-03-753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/14f8baa564e2/AJAE-101-03-753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/b362a7afc84f/AJAE-101-03-753-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/b88a0838c4a4/AJAE-101-03-753-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/9ec763bb6f46/AJAE-101-03-753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/14f8baa564e2/AJAE-101-03-753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/b362a7afc84f/AJAE-101-03-753-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/453e/7714250/b88a0838c4a4/AJAE-101-03-753-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Subsidies for Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Improved Grain Storage Bags in Uganda.农业技术采用补贴:来自乌干达一项关于改良谷物储存袋的随机试验的证据。
Am J Agric Econ. 2019 Feb 21;101(3):753-772. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aay108.
2
What drives smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya.是什么驱动了小农户购买新农业技术的意愿?来自肯尼亚一次实验性拍卖的证据。
Food Policy. 2019 May;85:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.005.
3
Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda.改进的储存技术能促进现代投入品的使用和粮食安全吗?来自乌干达一项随机试验的证据。
J Dev Econ. 2018 Nov;135:176-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.006.
4
The use and profitability of hermetic technologies for grain storage among smallholder farmers in eastern Kenya.肯尼亚东部小农户使用密封技术进行粮食储存的情况及收益性
J Stored Prod Res. 2020 May;87:101618. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101618.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of on-farm grain storage hermetic bags among small-scale maize growers in northwestern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部小规模玉米种植者使用农场粮食储存密封袋的成本效益分析。
Crop Prot. 2021 May;143:105478. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105478.
6
Comparative utility of hermetic and conventional grain storage bags for smallholder farmers: a meta-analysis.气密式和传统谷物储存袋对小农户的比较效用:一项荟萃分析。
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Jan 30;104(2):561-571. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12934. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Performance of Five Postharvest Storage Methods for Maize Preservation in Northern Benin.贝宁北部玉米保鲜的五种采后储存方法的效果
Insects. 2020 Aug 17;11(8):541. doi: 10.3390/insects11080541.
8
Estimating the Enduring Effects of Fertiliser Subsidies on Commercial Fertiliser Demand and Maize Production: Panel Data Evidence from Malawi.评估化肥补贴对商业化肥需求和玉米产量的持久影响:来自马拉维的面板数据证据
J Agric Econ. 2017 Feb;68(1):70-97. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12161. Epub 2016 May 1.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Four Hermetic Bag Brands Against Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in Stored Maize Grain.四种密封袋品牌对储存玉米粒中截形扁谷盗(鞘翅目:长蠹科)的防治效果比较
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Sep 26;111(5):2467-2475. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy217.
10
Delivery of agricultural technology to resource-poor farmers in Africa.向非洲资源匮乏的农民提供农业技术。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:369-76. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.010. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Money for operator: the impact of linked agricultural subsidy on incomes.给经营者的资金:关联农业补贴对收入的影响
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):13554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64100-w.
2
Perceived Value, Government Regulations, and Farmers' Agricultural Green Production Technology Adoption: Evidence from China's Yellow River Basin.感知价值、政府规制与农户农业绿色生产技术采用——来自黄河流域的证据
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):509-531. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01893-y. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda.改进的储存技术能促进现代投入品的使用和粮食安全吗?来自乌干达一项随机试验的证据。
J Dev Econ. 2018 Nov;135:176-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.006.
2
SHORT-RUN SUBSIDIES AND LONG-RUN ADOPTION OF NEW HEALTH PRODUCTS: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT.新健康产品的短期补贴与长期采用:来自一项实地实验的证据
Econometrica. 2014 Jan;82(1):197-228. doi: 10.3982/ECTA9508.
3
Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000.
什么因素影响了黑土区农民对测土配方施肥技术的采用?基于 Logistic-ISM 模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.
4
The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China's Poverty-Stricken Villages.农业补贴政策对食品安全的有效性评估:来自中国贫困村庄的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13797. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113797.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of on-farm grain storage hermetic bags among small-scale maize growers in northwestern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部小规模玉米种植者使用农场粮食储存密封袋的成本效益分析。
Crop Prot. 2021 May;143:105478. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105478.
6
Designing better input support programs: Lessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India.设计更好的输入支持计划:来自印度安得拉邦锌补贴的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242161. eCollection 2020.
7
What drives smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya.是什么驱动了小农户购买新农业技术的意愿?来自肯尼亚一次实验性拍卖的证据。
Food Policy. 2019 May;85:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.005.
评估1960年至2000年绿色革命的影响。
Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):758-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1078710.