• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对难以接触到的群体开展网络研究:关于实现有效接触的方法学思考

Doing Internet research with hard-to-reach communities: methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access.

作者信息

Kaufmann Mareile, Tzanetakis Meropi

机构信息

University of Oslo, Norway.

University of Vienna, Austria; University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Qual Res. 2020 Dec;20(6):927-944. doi: 10.1177/1468794120904898. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1177/1468794120904898
PMID:33281502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7683880/
Abstract

This article contributes to scholarship on digital sociology by addressing the methodological challenge of gaining access to hard-to-reach online communities. We use assemblage theory to argue how collaborative efforts of human participants, digital technologies, techniques, authorities, cultural codes and the human researcher co-determine aspects of gaining access to online subjects. In particular, we analyse how and are assembled in an online research context. This is exemplified by our own experiences of researching hackers that dispute surveillance and the social embeddedness of darknet drug market users. In this article, we demonstrate the utility of an assemblage perspective for understanding the complexities involved in negotiating access to hard-to-reach communities in digital spaces.

摘要

本文通过应对获取难以触及的在线社区这一方法论挑战,为数字社会学的学术研究做出了贡献。我们运用组合理论来论证人类参与者、数字技术、技巧、权威机构、文化代码和人类研究者的协同努力如何共同决定获取在线研究对象的各个方面。特别是,我们分析了在在线研究背景下,[具体内容缺失]是如何组合在一起的。我们对质疑监控行为的黑客以及暗网毒品市场用户的社会嵌入性进行研究的自身经历便是例证。在本文中,我们展示了组合视角对于理解在数字空间中协商进入难以触及的社区所涉及的复杂性的效用。

相似文献

1
Doing Internet research with hard-to-reach communities: methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access.针对难以接触到的群体开展网络研究:关于实现有效接触的方法学思考
Qual Res. 2020 Dec;20(6):927-944. doi: 10.1177/1468794120904898. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
2
Researching health inequalities with Community Researchers: practical, methodological and ethical challenges of an 'inclusive' research approach.与社区研究人员共同研究健康不平等问题:“包容性”研究方法的实践、方法和伦理挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 13;1:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0009-4. eCollection 2015.
3
The use of tags and tag clouds to discern credible content in online health message forums.利用标签和标签云来辨别在线健康信息论坛中的可信内容。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jan;81(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
4
Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmissible Infections in Expatriates and Traveler Networks: Qualitative Study of Peer Interaction in an Online Forum.预防外派人员和旅行者群体中的艾滋病毒及其他性传播感染:在线论坛中同伴互动的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10787. doi: 10.2196/10787.
5
Real social analytics: A contribution towards a phenomenology of a digital world.真实的社会分析:对数字世界现象学的一种贡献。
Br J Sociol. 2016 Mar;67(1):118-37. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12183. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Digital localisation in an illicit market space: interactional creation of a psychedelic assemblage in a darknet community of exchange.非法市场中的数字定位:暗网交易社区中迷幻药物组合的互动创造。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103514. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Challenges and Strategies of Sexual Minority Youth Research in Southwest Virginia.弗吉尼亚西南部性少数青年研究的挑战与策略
J Homosex. 2018;65(6):691-704. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1364104. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Religion and the internet: digital religion, (hyper)mediated spaces, and materiality.宗教与互联网:数字宗教、(超)媒介空间与物质性。
Z Relig Ges Polit. 2022;6(1):9-25. doi: 10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
9
Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age.年度研究综述:在线和移动技术的儿童使用者所经历的危害:数字时代的性和攻击风险的性质、普遍性和管理。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):635-54. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12197. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
10
'Nice people doing shady things': Drugs and the morality of exchange in the darknet cryptomarkets.“好人做卑鄙事”:暗网加密货币市场中的毒品与交换道德。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Aug;58:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital ethnography: ethics through the case of QAnon.数字民族志:以匿名者Q事件为例探讨伦理问题
Front Sociol. 2023 May 18;8:1119531. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1119531. eCollection 2023.
2
Turmeric and Cumin Instead of Stock Cubes: An Internet Survey of Spices and Culinary Herbs Used in Poland Compared with Historical Cookbooks and Herbals.用姜黄和小茴香替代汤块:一项关于波兰使用的香料和烹饪香草的网络调查,并与历史食谱和草药书进行比较。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;12(3):591. doi: 10.3390/plants12030591.
3
From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond.从挑战到机遇:新冠疫情期间及之后的虚拟定性研究
Int J Qual Methods. 2022 Jun 4;21:16094069221105075. doi: 10.1177/16094069221105075. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Practical strategies for qualitative inquiry in a virtual world.虚拟世界中定性研究的实用策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4035-4044. doi: 10.1111/jan.15000. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing cryptomarkets for drugs. A characterisation of sellers and buyers over time.比较毒品的加密市场。对卖家和买家随时间的特征描述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
2
The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets.透明度悖论:在传统和在线药品市场建立信任、解决争端及优化物流
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
3
The surveillant assemblage.监测组合
Br J Sociol. 2000 Dec;51(4):605-22. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280.
4
Sampling hard to reach populations.对难以接触到的人群进行抽样。
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Oct;26(4):790-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x.