College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Martha S. Pitzer Center for Women, Children and Youth, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4035-4044. doi: 10.1111/jan.15000. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
The aim of this article is to provide practical strategies for maintaining methodological rigour in executing a virtual qualitative study. Strategies are based on evidence from existing research about virtual qualitative methods and on the strategies used by the authors to convert a planned in-person qualitative, grounded theory study to an entirely virtual grounded theory study during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study began in-person in September 2019 and was converted to virtual in March 2020. Virtual data collection was completed in September 2020.
This article provides a case exemplar of virtual adaptations made to a study underway when the pandemic rendered all in-person research impractical and potentially dangerous.
The strategies discussed are based on our own experiences and the supporting theoretical assumptions of qualitative research, specifically grounded theory methods.
Nursing scholars conducting qualitative inquiry may find these strategies helpful in continuing research activities during periods of limited access to the phenomena or persons of interest. Furthermore, these strategies allow nursing scholars to conduct rigorous, in-depth research without geographical limitations, providing greater possibilities for international collaborations and cross-institution research.
Despite novel challenges, methodological adaptations that are carefully planned and purposeful allow qualitative and non-qualitative scholars to continue research activities in a fully virtual manner.
This case exemplar and discussion provide practical strategies for qualitative scholars to consider while planning new studies or converting an in-person study to a virtual one. Despite the in-person nature of in-depth qualitative inquiry, a historic pandemic and a changing research environment require qualitative researchers to adapt to virtual methods while still conducting high quality, methodologically rigorous research. Qualitative scholars can use the strategies presented here to continue rigorous qualitative inquiry despite limited access to phenomena or persons.
本文旨在提供在执行虚拟定性研究时保持方法严谨性的实用策略。策略基于现有关于虚拟定性方法的研究证据,以及作者在 COVID-19 大流行期间将计划中的现场定性、扎根理论研究转换为完全虚拟扎根理论研究时所使用的策略。该研究于 2019 年 9 月开始进行现场研究,并于 2020 年 3 月转换为虚拟研究。虚拟数据收集于 2020 年 9 月完成。
本文提供了一个案例范例,展示了在大流行使得所有现场研究变得不切实际和潜在危险时,对正在进行的研究进行的虚拟改编。
讨论中提到的策略基于我们自己的经验和定性研究的支持性理论假设,特别是扎根理论方法。
进行定性探究的护理学者可能会发现这些策略有助于在有限接触感兴趣的现象或人员的时期继续研究活动。此外,这些策略使护理学者能够进行严格、深入的研究,而不受地理限制,为国际合作和跨机构研究提供了更大的可能性。
尽管面临新的挑战,但精心计划和有目的的方法改编允许定性和非定性学者以完全虚拟的方式继续研究活动。
这个案例范例和讨论为定性学者在计划新研究或将现场研究转换为虚拟研究时提供了实用的策略。尽管深入的定性探究具有现场性质,但历史性的大流行和不断变化的研究环境要求定性研究人员适应虚拟方法,同时仍进行高质量、方法严谨的研究。定性学者可以使用这里提出的策略来继续进行严格的定性探究,尽管对现象或人员的接触有限。