Gentsch Kornelia, Beermann Ursula, Wu Lingdan, Trznadel Stéphanie, Scherer Klaus R
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), University of Geneva, Campus Biotech, 9, Chemin des Mines, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Erfurt, Germany.
Affect Sci. 2020;1(4):208-224. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00020-y. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Appraisal theories suggest that valence appraisal should be differentiated into micro-valences, such as intrinsic pleasantness and goal-/need-related appraisals. In contrast to a macro-valence approach, this dissociation explains, among other things, the emergence of mixed or blended emotions. Here, we extend earlier research that showed that these valence types can be empirically dissociated. We examine the timing and the response patterns of these two micro-valences via measuring facial muscle activity changes (electromyography, EMG) over the brow and the cheek regions. In addition, we explore the effects of the sensory stimulus modality (vision, audition, and olfaction) on these patterns. The two micro-valences were manipulated in a social judgment task: first, intrinsic un/pleasantness (IP) was manipulated by exposing participants to appropriate stimuli presented in different sensory domains followed by a goal conduciveness/obstruction (GC) manipulation consisting of feedback on participants' judgments that were congruent or incongruent with their task-related goal. The results show significantly different EMG responses and timing patterns for both types of micro-valence, confirming the prediction that they are independent, consecutive parts of the appraisal process. Moreover, the lack of interaction effects with the sensory stimulus modality suggests high generalizability of the underlying appraisal mechanisms across different perception channels.
评价理论表明,效价评价应细分为微观效价,如内在愉悦感和与目标/需求相关的评价。与宏观效价方法不同,这种区分尤其解释了混合或交融情绪的产生。在此,我们扩展了早期的研究,该研究表明这些效价类型可以通过实证进行区分。我们通过测量额头和脸颊区域的面部肌肉活动变化(肌电图,EMG)来研究这两种微观效价的时间和反应模式。此外,我们还探讨了感觉刺激模态(视觉、听觉和嗅觉)对这些模式的影响。在一项社会判断任务中对这两种微观效价进行了操控:首先,通过让参与者接触不同感觉领域呈现的适当刺激来操控内在愉悦/不悦感(IP),随后进行目标促进/阻碍(GC)操控,即给予参与者与他们的任务相关目标相符或不符的判断反馈。结果显示,两种类型的微观效价的肌电图反应和时间模式存在显著差异,证实了它们是评价过程中独立且连续的部分这一预测。此外,与感觉刺激模态缺乏交互效应表明潜在的评价机制在不同感知通道中具有高度的普遍性。