Gentsch Kornelia, Grandjean Didier, Scherer Klaus R
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Neuroscience of Emotion and Affective Dynamics Lab (NEAD), Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0135837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135837. eCollection 2015.
Scherer's Component Process Model provides a theoretical framework for research on the production mechanism of emotion and facial emotional expression. The model predicts that appraisal results drive facial expressions, which unfold sequentially and cumulatively over time. In two experiments, we examined facial muscle activity changes (via facial electromyography recordings over the corrugator, cheek, and frontalis regions) in response to events in a gambling task. These events were experimentally manipulated feedback stimuli which presented simultaneous information directly affecting goal conduciveness (gambling outcome: win, loss, or break-even) and power appraisals (Experiment 1 and 2), as well as control appraisal (Experiment 2). We repeatedly found main effects of goal conduciveness (starting ~600 ms), and power appraisals (starting ~800 ms after feedback onset). Control appraisal main effects were inconclusive. Interaction effects of goal conduciveness and power appraisals were obtained in both experiments (Experiment 1: over the corrugator and cheek regions; Experiment 2: over the frontalis region) suggesting amplified goal conduciveness effects when power was high in contrast to invariant goal conduciveness effects when power was low. Also an interaction of goal conduciveness and control appraisals was found over the cheek region, showing differential goal conduciveness effects when control was high and invariant effects when control was low. These interaction effects suggest that the appraisal of having sufficient control or power affects facial responses towards gambling outcomes. The result pattern suggests that corrugator and frontalis regions are primarily related to cognitive operations that process motivational pertinence, whereas the cheek region would be more influenced by coping implications. Our results provide first evidence demonstrating that cognitive-evaluative mechanisms related to goal conduciveness, control, and power appraisals affect facial expressions dynamically over time, immediately after an event is perceived. In addition, our results provide further indications for the chronography of appraisal-driven facial movements and the underlying cognitive processes.
谢勒的成分加工模型为情绪产生机制及面部情绪表达的研究提供了一个理论框架。该模型预测,评价结果驱动面部表情,面部表情会随着时间依次且累积地展开。在两项实验中,我们通过记录皱眉肌、脸颊和额肌区域的面部肌电图,研究了在赌博任务中对事件做出反应时面部肌肉活动的变化。这些事件是经过实验操纵的反馈刺激,它们同时呈现直接影响目标达成度(赌博结果:赢、输或收支平衡)和权力评价(实验1和实验2)以及控制评价(实验2)的信息。我们反复发现目标达成度(约600毫秒开始)和权力评价(反馈开始后约800毫秒开始)的主效应。控制评价的主效应尚无定论。在两项实验中均获得了目标达成度和权力评价的交互效应(实验1:在皱眉肌和脸颊区域;实验2:在额肌区域),这表明当权力较高时,目标达成度效应会增强,而当权力较低时,目标达成度效应不变。在脸颊区域还发现了目标达成度和控制评价的交互作用,表明当控制较高时目标达成度效应存在差异,而当控制较低时效应不变。这些交互效应表明,对拥有足够控制或权力的评价会影响对赌博结果的面部反应。结果模式表明,皱眉肌和额肌区域主要与处理动机相关性的认知操作有关,而脸颊区域受应对影响的程度更大。我们的结果首次证明,与目标达成度、控制和权力评价相关的认知评价机制会在事件被感知后立即随时间动态地影响面部表情。此外,我们的结果为评价驱动的面部运动的计时及潜在认知过程提供了进一步的线索。