• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期慢性病管理在成人智障患者基层医疗中的变化,以及医疗保健不平等差距。

Changes over time in the management of long-term conditions in primary health care for adults with intellectual disabilities, and the healthcare inequality gap.

机构信息

Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Mar;34(2):634-647. doi: 10.1111/jar.12833. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12833
PMID:33283349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality of primary healthcare impacts on health outcomes. This study aimed to quantify trends in good practice and the healthcare inequalities gap.

METHOD

Indicators of best-practice management of long-term conditions and health promotion were extracted from primary healthcare records on 721 adults with intellectual disabilities in 2007-2010, and 3638 in 2014. They were compared over time, and with the general population in 2014, using Fisher's Exact test and ordinal regression.

RESULTS

Management improved for adults with intellectual disabilities over time (OR = 5.32; CI = 2.69-10.55), but not for the general population (OR = 0.74; CI = 0.34-1.64). However, it remained poorer, but to a lesser extent, compared with the general population (OR = 0.38; CI = 0.20-0.73 in 2014, and OR = 0.05; CI = 0.02-0.12 in 2007-2010). In 2014, health care was comparable to the general population on 49/78 (62.8%) indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of the healthcare inequality gap reduced over this period, but remaining inequalities highlight that further action is still necessary.

摘要

背景

初级医疗保健的质量对健康结果有影响。本研究旨在量化良好实践的趋势和医疗保健不平等差距。

方法

从 2007-2010 年和 2014 年的 721 名智力残疾成年人以及 3638 名成年人的初级保健记录中提取了长期疾病管理和健康促进的最佳实践指标。使用 Fisher 精确检验和有序回归比较了随时间的变化,并与 2014 年的一般人群进行了比较。

结果

随着时间的推移,智力残疾成年人的管理水平有所提高(OR=5.32;CI=2.69-10.55),但一般人群的管理水平并没有提高(OR=0.74;CI=0.34-1.64)。然而,与一般人群相比,它仍然较差,但程度较轻(2014 年 OR=0.38;CI=0.20-0.73,2007-2010 年 OR=0.05;CI=0.02-0.12)。2014 年,在 78 项指标中有 49 项(62.8%)与一般人群相当。

结论

在此期间,医疗保健不平等差距的程度有所缩小,但仍存在不平等现象,这表明仍需采取进一步行动。

相似文献

1
Changes over time in the management of long-term conditions in primary health care for adults with intellectual disabilities, and the healthcare inequality gap.长期慢性病管理在成人智障患者基层医疗中的变化,以及医疗保健不平等差距。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Mar;34(2):634-647. doi: 10.1111/jar.12833. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Management and prevalence of long-term conditions in primary health care for adults with intellectual disabilities compared with the general population: A population-based cohort study.成年人智力残疾患者的初级卫生保健中的长期疾病管理和流行情况与普通人群相比:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31 Suppl 1:68-81. doi: 10.1111/jar.12386. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Prevalence and general health status of people with intellectual disabilities in Scotland: a total population study.苏格兰智障人群的患病率和总体健康状况:一项总人口研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Jan;72(1):78-85. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209748. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
4
Uncovering health care inequalities among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.揭示智力和发育障碍成年人中的医疗保健不平等现象。
Health Soc Work. 2010 Nov;35(4):280-90. doi: 10.1093/hsw/35.4.280.
5
Hospital admissions for physical health conditions for people with intellectual disabilities: Systematic review.智力残疾患者的身体健康状况住院治疗情况:系统评价。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31 Suppl 1:1-10. doi: 10.1111/jar.12360. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
National health surveillance of adults with disabilities, adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and adults with no disabilities.对残疾成年人、智力与发育障碍成年人以及非残疾成年人的全国健康监测。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Apr;8(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
7
Supporting primary healthcare professionals to care for people with intellectual disability: a research agenda.支持初级医疗保健专业人员照料智障人士:一项研究议程。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015 Jan;28(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/jar.12132.
8
Preventable Emergency Hospital Admissions Among Adults With Intellectual Disability in England.英格兰成年智障人士中可预防的急诊住院情况。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):462-470. doi: 10.1370/afm.2104.
9
Approaches to primary care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Importance of frameworks for guidelines.针对成年智力和发育障碍患者的初级保健方法:指南框架的重要性。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Apr;64(Suppl 2):S5-S7.
10
Relative influence of intellectual disabilities and autism on mental and general health in Scotland: a cross-sectional study of a whole country of 5.3 million children and adults.智力残疾和自闭症对苏格兰精神和总体健康的相对影响:对一个拥有 530 万儿童和成人的整个国家的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e029040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029040.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalisation rates for epilepsy, asthma and insulin-dependent diabetes in 796 190 school-aged children and young people with and without intellectual disabilities: a record-linkage cohort study.796190名有和没有智力残疾的学龄儿童及青少年中癫痫、哮喘和胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的住院率:一项记录链接队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e088809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088809.
2
Stakeholder perspectives of immunisation delivery for adolescents with disability in specialist schools in Victoria, Australia: 'we need a vaccination pathway'.澳大利亚维多利亚州特殊学校中残疾青少年免疫接种的利益相关者观点:“我们需要一个疫苗接种途径”。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):1973. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19322-y.
3
A Scoping Review of the Intersectionality of Autism and Intellectual and Developmental Disability with Social Inequity on Diagnosis and Treatment of Youth.
自闭症与智力和发育障碍在青年诊断和治疗方面与社会不平等的交叉问题的范围综述。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2024 Sep;34(7):292-301. doi: 10.1089/cap.2023.0058. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Chronic disease management in patients with intellectual disabilities: a matched study in Dutch general practice.智障患者的慢性病管理:荷兰普通实践中的匹配研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Sep 28;73(735):e744-e751. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0029. Print 2023 Oct.
5
Elements of chronic disease management service system: an empirical study from large hospitals in China.慢性病管理服务体系要素:来自中国大型医院的实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 5;12(1):5693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09784-8.