• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力残疾成年人中模糊代词的解释。

Interpretation of ambiguous pronouns in adults with intellectual disabilities.

机构信息

Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Sorenson Language and Communication Center, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Feb;65(2):125-132. doi: 10.1111/jir.12801. Epub 2020 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1111/jir.12801
PMID:33283378
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pronouns are referentially ambiguous (e.g. she could refer to any female), yet they are common in everyday conversations. Individuals with typical development (TD) employ several strategies to avoid pronoun interpretation errors, including the subject bias - an assumption that a pronoun typically refers to the subject (or, with the closely related order-of-mention bias, the first-mentioned character) of the previous sentence. However, it is unknown if adults with intellectual disability (ID) share this strategy or the extent to which the subject bias is associated with non-verbal abilities or receptive vocabulary.

METHODS

We tested 22 adults with mixed-aetiology ID on their interpretation of ambiguous pronouns using the visual world eye-tracking paradigm and by asking a follow-up pronoun interpretation question. A group of TD adults was also tested to establish the strength of the subject bias with our materials and task.

RESULTS

Adults with ID did demonstrate the subject bias, but it was significantly less robust than that seen in TD. For participants with ID, the subject bias was influenced by non-verbal IQ and receptive vocabulary at different stages of processing.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the frequency of pronouns in conversation, strengthening the subject bias may help alleviate discourse and reading comprehension challenges for individuals with ID, particularly those with lower non-verbal and/or vocabulary skills.

摘要

背景

代词在指代上是模糊的(例如,“她”可以指代任何女性),但它们在日常对话中很常见。具有典型发展(TD)的个体使用几种策略来避免代词解释错误,包括主语偏向——即一个代词通常指代前一个句子的主语(或者与主语偏向密切相关的提及顺序偏向,即第一个提到的人物)。然而,目前尚不清楚智力障碍(ID)成年人是否具有这种策略,或者主语偏向与非言语能力或接受性词汇量的关联程度。

方法

我们使用视觉世界眼动追踪范式和后续代词解释问题,测试了 22 名具有混合病因 ID 的成年人对模糊代词的解释。还测试了一组 TD 成年人,以用我们的材料和任务确定主语偏向的强度。

结果

ID 成年人确实表现出主语偏向,但与 TD 相比,他们的主语偏向明显较弱。对于 ID 参与者,主语偏向在不同的加工阶段受到非言语智商和接受性词汇量的影响。

结论

鉴于代词在对话中的高频率,加强主语偏向可能有助于减轻 ID 个体的话语和阅读理解挑战,尤其是那些非言语和/或词汇技能较低的个体。

相似文献

1
Interpretation of ambiguous pronouns in adults with intellectual disabilities.智力残疾成年人中模糊代词的解释。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Feb;65(2):125-132. doi: 10.1111/jir.12801. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
2
The Effects of Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Prominence on Pronoun Interpretation in Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.句法、语义和语用突显对智力和发育障碍成年人代词理解的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Sep 13;66(9):3606-3621. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00557. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.代词解析中的个体差异和情境偏差:来自事件相关电位的证据
Brain Res. 2006 Nov 6;1118(1):155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.022. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
4
Comprehending reflexive and clitic constructions in children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental language disorder.理解自闭症谱系障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童的反身代词和小品词结构。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Nov;55(6):884-898. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12568. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
Comprehension of active, passive, and causative sentences by Japanese-speaking children with intellectual disabilities and typical development.日本语母语的智障儿童和正常发展儿童对主动句、被动句和使役句的理解。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 Oct 2;38(10):1006-1023. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2023.2293451. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
6
Pronominal anaphora resolution in Polish: Investigating online sentence interpretation using eye-tracking.波兰语代词回指消解:使用眼动追踪研究在线句子理解。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262459. eCollection 2022.
7
Learning the statistics of pronoun reference: By word or by category?代词指代的统计学习:用词还是用词类?
Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105546. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105546. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences.你指的是谁?轻度智力残疾的年轻学生如何应对文本和句子中的指代歧义。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:108-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
9
Direct object pronoun sentence processing in Spanish-English children with/without Specific Language Impairment and adults: A cross-modal priming study.有/无特定语言障碍的西班牙裔-英语儿童及成人对直接宾语代词句子的处理:一项跨模态启动研究。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Mar-Apr;72:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Receptive Language Skills in Slovak-Speaking Children With Intellectual Disability: Understanding Words, Sentences, and Stories.斯洛伐克语谱系障碍儿童的接受性语言技能:理解单词、句子和故事。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1731-1742. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0029.