Ph.D. Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Policy and Strategy, TennCare, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1073-1084. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13597.
To examine the growth and evolution of the home health agency (HHA) market and to compare quality performance across HHA ownership categories.
Agency characteristics were extracted from Medicare cost reports and Provider of Services file. Quality of care and patient characteristics were extracted from Quality of Patient Care Star Ratings and HHA Public Use File.
Agency- and state-level analyses were conducted to describe HHA market trends. Patient characteristics and quality measures were compared across ownership categories of interest.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: All Medicare-certified HHAs in operation, 2005-2018.
Over the study period, the HHA sector grew substantially, increasing from 7899 to 10 818 agencies, and chain-owned HHAs doubled in number from 903 (11.4% of all agencies) to 1841 (17.0%). In 2018, across agency types, for-profit nonchain agencies were the largest category both in the number of agencies (67.8%) and the number of Medicare enrollees served (40.7%). Additionally, for-profit nonchain agencies grew most in total number, from 4293 (54.3%) to 7337 (67.8%), while for-profit chain agencies grew most in the number of Medicare enrollees served, from 439 998 (12.9%) to 1 082 385 (28.3%). Regarding patient composition, for-profit nonchain agencies served the highest proportion of dual eligible beneficiaries (42.2%) and African-Americans (27.9%) among all agency types. Regarding quality performance, a higher star rating is significantly (P < .01) associated with chain agency status. Moreover, chain HHAs performed better on self-reported process measures, and risk-adjusted self-reported outcome measures; however, they performed worse on risk-adjusted claims-based outcome measures. These results were similar across for-profit and nonprofit chain agencies.
Chains play a growing role in the home health sector. Substantial differences in geographic distribution, patient composition, and quality performance were observed between chain- and nonchain HHAs. Examining the growth and performance of multi-agency chains can help inform quality reporting and monitoring, assess payment adequacy, and facilitate greater transparency and accountability within the HHA marketplace.
研究家庭保健机构(HHA)市场的增长和演变,并比较 HHA 所有权类别之间的质量表现。
机构特征从医疗保险费用报告和服务提供者文件中提取。护理质量和患者特征从患者护理星级评定和 HHA 公共使用文件中提取。
进行机构和州级分析以描述 HHA 市场趋势。比较了各利益相关的所有权类别的患者特征和质量措施。
数据收集/提取方法:2005-2018 年所有运营的医疗保险认证 HHAs。
在研究期间,HHA 部门大幅增长,从 7899 家增加到 10818 家,连锁拥有的 HHA 数量翻了一番,从 903 家(所有机构的 11.4%)增加到 1841 家(17.0%)。2018 年,在所有机构类型中,营利性非连锁机构在机构数量(67.8%)和医疗保险参保人数(40.7%)方面均是最大的类别。此外,营利性非连锁机构的总数增长最多,从 4293 家(54.3%)增至 7337 家(67.8%),而营利性连锁机构的医疗保险参保人数增长最多,从 439998 人(12.9%)增至 1082385 人(28.3%)。关于患者构成,营利性非连锁机构为所有机构类型中服务最多的双重合格受益人(42.2%)和非裔美国人(27.9%)。关于质量表现,星级评定显著(P<0.01)与连锁机构地位相关。此外,连锁 HHAs 在自我报告的过程措施和风险调整后的自我报告的结果措施上表现更好;然而,它们在风险调整后的基于索赔的结果措施上表现更差。这些结果在营利性和非营利性连锁机构中是相似的。
连锁机构在家庭保健领域扮演着越来越重要的角色。在连锁和非连锁 HHAs 之间观察到地理分布、患者构成和质量表现方面存在显著差异。检查多机构连锁的增长和绩效可以帮助提供质量报告和监测,评估支付充足性,并促进 HHA 市场内更大的透明度和问责制。