• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症背景下的情感安全:多视角定性研究。

Emotional Safety in the Context of Dementia: A Multiperspective Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Hochschule Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):355-375. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201110.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-201110
PMID:33285639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902974/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current research acknowledges the relevance of the emotional safety of people living with dementia. However, available evidence regarding this topic is limited. A comprehensive view of this topic that equally considers the perspectives of people living in an early stage of dementia, relatives, and public stakeholders is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to obtain a multiperspective view of emotional safety in the context of dementia in the living environment.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study was conducted based on data collected through semi-structured guided interviews (n = 14), focus groups (n = 3), guided feedback, and participatory approaches. People living in an early stage of dementia (N = 6), relatives of people living with dementia (N = 11), and public stakeholders (N = 15) were included.

RESULTS

Considering "social togetherness", "personal condition", "health", "physical environment", and "society" in the light of "living and learning in relations" are preconditions for understanding emotional safety in the context of dementia. "Living and learning in relations" refers to the interaction of people in the context of dementia and relations to the topic of dementia. The focus lies on the (collective) learning. The individuality of each person and his or her situation is central, related to dementia-related, psychosocial, biographical, physical, and economic factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the relevance of research on emotional safety in the context of dementia. Approaches to improving the emotional safety of people living in an early stage of dementia should consider the complex situations of each target group in relation to each other at the micro, meso, and macro levels.

摘要

背景

目前的研究承认痴呆症患者的情感安全的相关性。然而,关于这个主题的可用证据是有限的。缺乏对这一主题的全面看法,即平等考虑处于痴呆症早期阶段的人、亲属和公众利益相关者的观点。

目的

本研究旨在从居住环境中痴呆症的角度获得对情感安全的多角度看法。

方法

根据通过半结构化引导访谈(n=14)、焦点小组(n=3)、引导反馈和参与式方法收集的数据,进行描述性定性研究。包括处于痴呆症早期阶段的人(n=6)、痴呆症患者的亲属(n=11)和公众利益相关者(n=15)。

结果

考虑到“社会团聚”、“个人状况”、“健康”、“物理环境”和“社会”,根据“在关系中生活和学习”,是理解痴呆症背景下情感安全的前提条件。“在关系中生活和学习”是指在痴呆症背景下和与痴呆症相关的主题中人们的互动。重点在于(集体)学习。每个人的个性及其状况是核心,与痴呆症相关的、心理社会的、传记的、身体的和经济的因素有关。

结论

我们的研究强调了痴呆症背景下情感安全研究的相关性。改善处于早期痴呆症阶段的人的情感安全的方法应考虑到每个目标群体在微观、中观和宏观层面相互之间的复杂情况。

相似文献

1
Emotional Safety in the Context of Dementia: A Multiperspective Qualitative Study.痴呆症背景下的情感安全:多视角定性研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):355-375. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201110.
2
Emotional safety of people living with dementia: a systematic review.痴呆症患者的情感安全:一项系统综述。
J Ment Health. 2023 Feb;32(1):110-131. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1739241. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Responding the "Wrong Way": The Emotion Work of Caring for a Family Member With Dementia.回应“错误的方式”:照顾痴呆症家庭成员的情感劳动。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e470-e478. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz047.
4
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia.促进痴呆症独立性(PRIDE)干预措施的发展,以增强痴呆症患者的独立性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Sep 10;14:1615-1630. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S214367. eCollection 2019.
5
6
Quality in residential care from the perspective of people living with dementia: The importance of personhood.从痴呆症患者的角度看住宿护理质量:人格的重要性。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Mar-Apr;63:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
Linking DemenTalent to Meeting Centers for people with dementia and their caregivers: a process analysis into facilitators and barriers in 12 Dutch Meeting Centers.将 DemenTalent 与痴呆症患者及其照顾者的聚会中心联系起来:对 12 个荷兰聚会中心的促进因素和障碍进行的过程分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1433-1445. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219001108.
8
"I just don't focus on my needs." The unmet health needs of partner and offspring caregivers of people with dementia: A qualitative study.“我只是不关注自己的需求。”痴呆患者的伴侣和子女照顾者的未满足的健康需求:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
The importance of trust-based relations and a holistic approach in advance care planning with people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study.在初级保健中与痴呆症患者进行基于信任的关系和整体方法的预先护理计划的重要性:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0872-6.
10
A participatory approach to understand what might be most meaningful to people living with dementia in a positive psychology intervention.一种参与式方法,以了解在积极心理学干预中,对患有痴呆症的人来说最有意义的可能是什么。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Aug;28(8):1090-1099. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2299967. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeling safe in the context of digitalization in healthcare: a scoping review.数字化医疗背景下的安全感:综述研究。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 8;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02465-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional safety of people living with dementia: a systematic review.痴呆症患者的情感安全:一项系统综述。
J Ment Health. 2023 Feb;32(1):110-131. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1739241. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Social emotion and patient safety: an important and understudied intersection.社会情感与患者安全:一个重要且研究不足的交叉领域。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010795. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Exploring how triads of people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals function in dementia health care: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis.探索患有痴呆症的三人组(患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员)在痴呆症保健中的作用:系统的定性综述和主题综合分析。
Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1080-1104. doi: 10.1177/1471301220915068. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
4
Dementia and patient safety in the community: a qualitative study of family carers' protective practices and implications for services.痴呆症和社区患者安全:对家庭护理者保护措施及其对服务影响的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4478-2.
5
'It's nice to think somebody's listening to me instead of saying "oh shut up"'. People with dementia reflect on what makes communication good and meaningful.“有人愿意倾听而不是说‘闭嘴’,感觉真好。”痴呆症患者反思是什么让交流变得美好而有意义。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):151-161. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12559. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
6
What is important to people living with dementia?: the 'long-list' of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.对患有痴呆症的人来说重要的是什么?:在开发用于评估非药物性基于社区的健康和社会护理干预措施的核心结局集的过程中,“长列表”结局指标。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5.
7
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
Emotional distress with dementia: A systematic review using corpus-based analysis and meta-ethnography.痴呆症患者的情绪困扰:一项基于语料库分析和元民族志的系统评价
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 May;33(5):679-687. doi: 10.1002/gps.4870. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Needs of people with advanced dementia in their final phase of life: A multi-perspective qualitative study in nursing homes.生命终末期患有重度痴呆症人群的需求:养老院的多视角定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):657-667. doi: 10.1177/0269216317746571. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Meeting psychosocial needs for persons with dementia in home care services - a qualitative study of different perceptions and practices among health care providers.满足居家护理服务中痴呆症患者的心理社会需求——对医疗保健提供者不同认知与实践的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0612-3.