• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索患有痴呆症的三人组(患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员)在痴呆症保健中的作用:系统的定性综述和主题综合分析。

Exploring how triads of people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals function in dementia health care: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis.

机构信息

University College London, UK.

King's College London, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1080-1104. doi: 10.1177/1471301220915068. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1177/1471301220915068
PMID:32212862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047709/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many qualitative studies report the post-diagnostic care experiences of carers and people living with dementia; however, this is not often accompanied by opportunities to hear the corresponding views of their health care professionals and how this triadic relationship functions. The aim of this review was to identify and thematically synthesize the experiences of health care services reported by people living with dementia, their carers and health care professionals.

METHODS

Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 31 July 2019 for qualitative research including people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals. Data were coded and thematically synthesised using NVivo.

RESULTS

Of 10,045 search results, 29 papers relating to 27 studies were included in the final synthesis, including 261 people living with dementia, 444 carers and 530 health care professionals. Six themes emerged related to the functioning of a dementia care triad: (1) involving the person living with dementia, (2) establishing expectations of care and the roles of the members of the triad, (3) building trust, (4) effective communication, (5) continuity of care and (6) understanding the unique relationship dynamics within each triad.

DISCUSSION

The interactions and complexity of triadic dementia care relationships further our understanding of how to improve dementia care. Awareness of possible diverging attitudes highlights areas of necessary improvement and further research into facilitating engagement, such as when multiple professionals are involved or where there are mismatched expectations of the roles of triad members. In order to operate efficiently as a triad member, professionals should be aware of how pre-existing relations can influence the composition of a triad, encourage the involvement of the person living with dementia, clarify the expectations of all parties, establish trusting relationships and enable communication within the direct triad and beyond.

摘要

背景

许多定性研究报告了照顾者和痴呆症患者的诊断后护理经历;然而,这通常并不伴随着倾听医疗保健专业人员的相应观点以及这种三方关系运作方式的机会。本综述的目的是确定和主题综合痴呆症患者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员报告的医疗服务经验。

方法

从开始到 2019 年 7 月 31 日,在 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL 上搜索定性研究,包括痴呆症患者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员。使用 NVivo 对数据进行编码和主题综合。

结果

在 10045 条搜索结果中,最终综合分析了 29 篇论文,涉及 27 项研究,包括 261 名痴呆症患者、444 名照顾者和 530 名医疗保健专业人员。出现了六个与痴呆症护理三方关系功能相关的主题:(1)涉及与痴呆症患者,(2)建立对护理的期望以及三方成员的角色,(3)建立信任,(4)有效沟通,(5)护理连续性和(6)了解每个三方关系中的独特关系动态。

讨论

三方痴呆症护理关系的相互作用和复杂性进一步加深了我们对如何改善痴呆症护理的理解。对可能存在的态度分歧的认识突出了需要改进的领域,并进一步研究如何促进参与,例如涉及多个专业人员或三方成员的角色期望不匹配时。为了作为三方成员有效地运作,专业人员应该意识到先前存在的关系如何影响三方的组成,鼓励痴呆症患者的参与,澄清各方的期望,建立信任关系,并在直接三方关系内和超越建立沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d1/8047709/587a7230435a/10.1177_1471301220915068-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d1/8047709/587a7230435a/10.1177_1471301220915068-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d1/8047709/587a7230435a/10.1177_1471301220915068-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring how triads of people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals function in dementia health care: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis.探索患有痴呆症的三人组(患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员)在痴呆症保健中的作用:系统的定性综述和主题综合分析。
Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1080-1104. doi: 10.1177/1471301220915068. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Trust and inclusion during the Covid-19 pandemic: Perspectives from Black and South Asian people living with dementia and their carers in the UK.新冠疫情期间的信任与包容:在英患有痴呆症的黑人和南亚人群及其照护者的观点。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;37(3). doi: 10.1002/gps.5689.
5
Integrated dementia care: A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences of people living with dementia, informal carers and healthcare professionals.综合痴呆症护理:对痴呆症患者、非专业照护者和医疗保健专业人员的体验的定性证据综合分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Nov-Dec;97:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104471. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Health and social care needs of people living with dementia: a qualitative study of dementia support in the Victorian region of Gippsland, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州吉普斯兰地区痴呆症支持的定性研究:痴呆症患者的健康和社会护理需求。
Rural Remote Health. 2024 Jan;24(1):8244. doi: 10.22605/RRH8244. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
7
Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies.照顾者在为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗决策时的支持需求:基于 Noblit 和 Hare 元质化综合定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608.
8
Healthcare organisation and delivery for people with dementia and comorbidity: a qualitative study exploring the views of patients, carers and professionals.针对患有痴呆症和合并症患者的医疗保健组织与服务提供:一项探索患者、护理人员和专业人员观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 18;7(1):e013067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013067.
9
The key factors for the engagement of primary stakeholders in decision-making for the future care of people with dementia living in the community: a systematic integrative review.主要利益相关者参与决策制定以规划社区居住的痴呆症患者未来照护的关键因素:系统综合评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Dec;31(12):1731-1746. doi: 10.1017/S104161021900005X. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
10
Healthcare professionals' dementia knowledge and attitudes towards dementia care and family carers' perceptions of dementia care in China: An integrative review.医护人员的痴呆症知识以及对痴呆症护理的态度和中国家庭照顾者对痴呆症护理的看法:综合评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1753-1775. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15451. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Explaining the unmet information needs of family carers of people with dementia: a theoretical model of information behaviour.解释痴呆症患者家庭照料者未满足的信息需求:一种信息行为理论模型
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05626-6.
2
Using a Trauma-Informed Care Approach to Understand Family Caregivers' Experiences of Accessing Formal Supports in Dementia Care.采用创伤知情护理方法来理解家庭照顾者在痴呆症护理中获得正式支持的经历。
J Fam Nurs. 2025 Feb;31(1):3-15. doi: 10.1177/10748407251314549. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Post-Diagnostic Care for People with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: When Help Is Needed in a "No-Man's Land".

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline Watch (October 2014): Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias.指南更新(2014年10月):阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症患者治疗实践指南
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2017 Jan;15(1):110-128. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.15106. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Developing the New Interventions for independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) theoretical model for supporting people to live well with dementia at home for longer: a systematic review of theoretical models and Randomised Controlled Trial evidence.开发新的痴呆症独立性干预研究(NIDUS)理论模型,以支持人们在家中更长久地过上良好的痴呆症生活:对理论模型和随机对照试验证据的系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01784-w. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
医疗保健专业人员对血管性认知障碍患者诊断后护理的看法:当“无人区”需要帮助时。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(3):1001-1013. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240526.
4
Different views on collaboration between older persons, informal caregivers and care professionals.老年人、非正式照护者和护理专业人员之间合作的不同观点。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14091. doi: 10.1111/hex.14091.
5
Care Partner Perspectives on the Use of a Patient Portal Intervention to Promote Care Partner Identification in Dementia Care.护理伙伴对使用患者门户网站干预措施以促进痴呆症护理中护理伙伴身份识别的看法。
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):136-146. doi: 10.1177/07334648241262649. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
Triadic Communication in Medical Encounters Including Individuals With Dementia: A Scoping Review.包括痴呆症患者在内的医疗问诊中的三元沟通:一项范围综述
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2024;38(2):213-225. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000626. Epub 2024 May 30.
7
An exploration of how specialist dementia nurses perceive and maintain the skills and competencies that frame their specialism: A qualitative survey.关于痴呆症专科护士如何理解并保持构成其专业领域的技能和能力的探索:一项定性调查。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 22;10(7):e27856. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27856. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
8
In constant search of the good: a qualitative study into insiders' perspectives on living well with dementia.对美好生活的不懈探寻:一项关于痴呆症患者家属对与痴呆症患者共同美好生活的内部视角的定性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;15:1285843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1285843. eCollection 2024.
9
Transition of patients with recently diagnosed Dementia from inpatient to outpatient setting- a scoping review.近期诊断为痴呆症的患者从住院向门诊过渡的情况:综述
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04638-y.
10
Dentists' Approaches to Treatment Decision-Making for People with Dementia: A Qualitative Study.牙医对痴呆症患者治疗决策的方法:一项定性研究。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jul;9(3):221-230. doi: 10.1177/23800844231199385. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review.全科医生在痴呆症预先医疗指示规划中的障碍和促进因素:系统综合评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198535. eCollection 2018.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries.获取和使用正式痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:在 8 个欧洲国家进行的一项焦点小组研究,涉及痴呆症患者、非正式照顾者以及卫生和社会保健专业人员的发现。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1.
5
Understanding the conceptualisation of risk in the context of community dementia care.理解社区痴呆症护理背景下的风险概念化。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jul;208:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 May 9.
6
Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Practice Recommendations.阿尔茨海默病协会痴呆症护理实践建议。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S1-S9. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx182.
7
"We're certainly not in our comfort zone": a qualitative study of GPs' dementia-care educational needs.“我们肯定不在舒适区”:对全科医生痴呆症护理教育需求的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 22;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0639-8.
8
Recognizing decision needs: first step for collaborative deliberation in dementia care networks.识别决策需求:痴呆症照护网络中协作审议的第一步。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
9
A qualitative study exploring medication management in people with dementia living in the community and the potential role of the community pharmacist.一项探索社区居住的痴呆症患者药物管理以及社区药剂师潜在作用的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):929-942. doi: 10.1111/hex.12534. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Health care triads and dementia care: Integrative framework and future directions.医疗保健三元组与痴呆症护理:综合框架及未来方向。
Aging Ment Health. 2001 May;5(sup1):35-48. doi: 10.1080/713649999.