Saadat Nima P, Nies Tim, Rousset Yvan, Ebenhöh Oliver
Institute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 28;22(3):277. doi: 10.3390/e22030277.
Understanding microbial growth with the use of mathematical models has a long history that dates back to the pioneering work of Jacques Monod in the 1940s. Monod's famous growth law expressed microbial growth rate as a simple function of the limiting nutrient concentration. However, to explain growth laws from underlying principles is extremely challenging. In the second half of the 20th century, numerous experimental approaches aimed at precisely measuring heat production during microbial growth to determine the entropy balance in a growing cell and to quantify the exported entropy. This has led to the development of thermodynamic theories of microbial growth, which have generated fundamental understanding and identified the principal limitations of the growth process. Although these approaches ignored metabolic details and instead considered microbial metabolism as a black box, modern theories heavily rely on genomic resources to describe and model metabolism in great detail to explain microbial growth. Interestingly, however, thermodynamic constraints are often included in modern modeling approaches only in a rather superficial fashion, and it appears that recent modeling approaches and classical theories are rather disconnected fields. To stimulate a closer interaction between these fields, we here review various theoretical approaches that aim at describing microbial growth based on thermodynamics and outline the resulting thermodynamic limits and optimality principles. We start with classical black box models of cellular growth, and continue with recent metabolic modeling approaches that include thermodynamics, before we place these models in the context of fundamental considerations based on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. We conclude by identifying conceptual overlaps between the fields and suggest how the various types of theories and models can be integrated. We outline how concepts from one approach may help to inform or constrain another, and we demonstrate how genome-scale models can be used to infer key black box parameters, such as the energy of formation or the degree of reduction of biomass. Such integration will allow understanding to what extent microbes can be viewed as thermodynamic machines, and how close they operate to theoretical optima.
利用数学模型理解微生物生长有着悠久的历史,可追溯到20世纪40年代雅克·莫诺的开创性工作。莫诺著名的生长定律将微生物生长速率表示为限制营养物浓度的简单函数。然而,从基本原理解释生长定律极具挑战性。在20世纪下半叶,众多实验方法旨在精确测量微生物生长过程中的产热,以确定生长细胞中的熵平衡并量化输出的熵。这导致了微生物生长热力学理论的发展,这些理论产生了基本认识并确定了生长过程的主要限制。尽管这些方法忽略了代谢细节,而是将微生物代谢视为一个黑箱,但现代理论严重依赖基因组资源来详细描述和模拟代谢以解释微生物生长。然而,有趣的是,热力学约束在现代建模方法中往往只是以相当表面的方式包含在内,而且似乎最近的建模方法和经典理论是相当脱节的领域。为了促进这些领域之间更紧密的互动,我们在此回顾各种旨在基于热力学描述微生物生长的理论方法,并概述由此产生的热力学极限和最优性原理。我们从细胞生长的经典黑箱模型开始,接着介绍包括热力学的近期代谢建模方法,然后将这些模型置于基于非平衡统计力学的基本考虑背景下。我们通过识别各领域之间的概念重叠来得出结论,并建议如何整合各种类型的理论和模型。我们概述一种方法中的概念如何有助于为另一种方法提供信息或进行约束,并展示基因组规模模型如何用于推断关键的黑箱参数,例如形成能或生物量的还原度。这种整合将有助于理解微生物在多大程度上可被视为热力发动机,以及它们与理论最优状态的接近程度。