• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模态转换和不确定条件下话语更新的神经关联。

Neural Correlates of Modal Displacement and Discourse-Updating under (Un)Certainty.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY 10003

New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirate.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2021 Jan 14;8(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020
PMID:33288644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7810261/
Abstract

A hallmark of human thought is the ability to think about not just the actual world but also about alternative ways the world could be. One way to study this contrast is through language. Language has grammatical devices for expressing possibilities and necessities, such as the words or With these devices, called "modal expressions," we can study the actual versus possible contrast in a highly controlled way. While factual utterances such as "There is a monster under my bed" update the here-and-now of a discourse model, a modal version of this sentence, "There might be a monster under my bed," displaces from the here-and-now and merely postulates a possibility. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to test whether the processes of discourse updating and modal displacement dissociate in the brain. Factual and modal utterances were embedded in short narratives, and across two experiments, factual expressions increased the measured activity over modal expressions. However, the localization of the increase appeared to depend on perspective: signal localizing in right temporoparietal areas increased when updating the representation of someone else's beliefs, while frontal medial areas seem sensitive to updating one's own beliefs. The presence of modal displacement did not elevate MEG signal strength in any of our analyses. In sum, this study identifies potential neural signatures of the process by which facts get added to our mental representation of the world.

摘要

人类思维的一个特点是,不仅能够思考现实世界,还能够思考世界的其他可能存在方式。研究这种对比的一种方法是通过语言。语言有表达可能性和必然性的语法手段,例如“或者”和“可能”。通过这些被称为“模态表达式”的手段,我们可以以高度受控的方式研究实际与可能之间的对比。虽然像“我的床底下有一个怪物”这样的事实陈述更新了话语模型的此时此地,但这个句子的模态版本“我的床底下可能有一个怪物”则将此时此地从话语中置换出来,只是假设了一种可能性。我们使用脑磁图(MEG)来测试大脑中话语更新和模态置换是否分离。事实和模态陈述被嵌入在短叙事中,在两个实验中,事实陈述比模态陈述增加了测量到的活动。然而,增加的定位似乎取决于视角:当更新别人的信念的表示时,信号定位在右颞顶区域增加,而额内侧区域似乎对更新自己的信念敏感。在我们的任何分析中,模态置换的出现都没有提高 MEG 信号强度。总之,这项研究确定了事实被添加到我们对世界的心理表征的过程中的潜在神经特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/98e5f4ee382e/SN-ENUJ200318F009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/1753b2cf954e/SN-ENUJ200318F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/41c3bea8e8db/SN-ENUJ200318F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/d61ba2824879/SN-ENUJ200318F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/99db136d4629/SN-ENUJ200318F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/51322fdf570b/SN-ENUJ200318F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/571a48af975d/SN-ENUJ200318F006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/cbe3c931f043/SN-ENUJ200318F007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/0baa4250b4e8/SN-ENUJ200318F008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/98e5f4ee382e/SN-ENUJ200318F009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/1753b2cf954e/SN-ENUJ200318F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/41c3bea8e8db/SN-ENUJ200318F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/d61ba2824879/SN-ENUJ200318F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/99db136d4629/SN-ENUJ200318F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/51322fdf570b/SN-ENUJ200318F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/571a48af975d/SN-ENUJ200318F006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/cbe3c931f043/SN-ENUJ200318F007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/0baa4250b4e8/SN-ENUJ200318F008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5a/7810261/98e5f4ee382e/SN-ENUJ200318F009.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural Correlates of Modal Displacement and Discourse-Updating under (Un)Certainty.模态转换和不确定条件下话语更新的神经关联。
eNeuro. 2021 Jan 14;8(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.
2
Situation updating during discourse comprehension recruits right posterior portion of the multiple-demand network.在语篇理解过程中进行情境更新会招募多重需求网络的右后部分。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Apr 15;44(6):2129-2141. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26198. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
My belief or yours? Differential theory of mind deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.我的信念还是你的信念?额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的心智差异理论缺陷。
Brain. 2012 Oct;135(Pt 10):3026-38. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws237.
4
Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.考察反事实语言理解的认知成本:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.神经证据表明语言理解过程中可预测生物性特征:来自 MEG 和 EEG 表象相似性分析的证据。
J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 15;40(16):3278-3291. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1733-19.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.使用 MEG 定位语言理解中语义和句法异常的电生理反应。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:507-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
7
Language in context: Characterizing the comprehension of referential expressions with MEG.语境中的语言:用脑磁图描绘指代性表达的理解
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:447-460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
8
Context updating during sentence comprehension: the effect of aboutness topic.句子理解过程中的语境更新:关于性主题的影响。
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
9
An MEG study of silent meaning.一项关于无声含义的脑磁图研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1905-21. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1905.
10
Neural correlates of three cognitive processes involved in theory of mind and discourse comprehension.心理理论和话语理解中涉及的三种认知过程的神经关联。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):273-283. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0568-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Discourse-level comprehension engages medial frontal Theory of Mind brain regions even for expository texts.即使对于说明文,语篇层面的理解也会激活内侧前额叶心理理论脑区。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(6):780-796. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1525494. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
2
Constant Sub-second Cycling between Representations of Possible Futures in the Hippocampus.海马体中可能未来的表示之间的恒次秒循环。
Cell. 2020 Feb 6;180(3):552-567.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
The Acquisition of Modal Concepts.情态概念的习得。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;24(1):65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location.基于聚类的脑磁图/脑电图数据置换检验不能确定效应潜伏期或位置的显著性。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Jun;56(6):e13335. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13335. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
What we know about knowing: Presuppositions generated by factive verbs influence downstream neural processing.关于认知我们所知道的:事实动词产生的预设会影响下游的神经处理。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others' beliefs.心理化区域代表他人信念的分布式、连续和抽象维度。
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 1;161:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
7
Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400.语用技能可预测在线反事实理解:来自N400的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):814-24. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0433-4.
8
An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind.心理理论的神经认知模型评估。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 31;6:1610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610. eCollection 2015.
9
Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning.人类反事实推理的认知神经科学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;9:420. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00420. eCollection 2015.
10
How and where: theory-of-mind in the brain.方式与位置:大脑中的心理理论
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9:68-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 25.