Kuo Yong-Fang, Agrawal Pooja, Chou Lin-Na, Jupiter Daniel, Raji Mukaila A
Department of Internal Medicine and Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec 1. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16962.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of team structure composition and degree of collaboration among various providers on process and outcomes of primary care.
Cross-sectional study.
Data from 20% randomly selected primary care service areas in the 2015 Medicare claims were used to identify primary care practices.
449,460 patients with diabetes, heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cared for by the identified primary care practices.
Social network analysis measures, including edge density, degree centralization, and betweenness centralization for each practice.
When compared with practices with MDs and nurse practitioners (NPs) or/and physicians assistants (PAs), the practices with MDs had only lower degree of centralization and higher MD-to-MD connectedness. Within the primary care practices comprising MDs, NPs, or/and PAs, the nonphysician providers were more connected (measured as edge density) to all providers in the practice but with higher degree of centralization compared with the MDs in the practice. After adjusting for patient characteristics and type of practice, higher edge density was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-0.99), emergency department (ER) admission (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.70-0.92), and total spending (cost ratio (CR) = 0.86, standard error of the mean (SE) = 0.038). Conversely, higher degree centralization was associated with higher rates of hospitalization (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03-1.28), ER admission (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.08-1.40), and total spending (CR = 1.14, SE = 0.037). However, higher degree centralization was associated with lower rates of potentially inappropriate medications (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.81-0.99). Team leadership by an NP versus an MD was similar in the rate of ER admissions, hospitalizations, or total spending.
Our findings showed that highly connected primary care practices with high collaborative care and less top-down MD-centered authority have lower odds of hospitalization, fewer ER admissions, and less total spending; findings likely reflecting better communication and more coordinated care of older patients.
背景/目的:评估团队结构组成以及不同医疗服务提供者之间的协作程度对初级保健流程及结果的影响。
横断面研究。
利用2015年医疗保险理赔中随机抽取的20%初级保健服务区域的数据来确定初级保健机构。
由已确定的初级保健机构护理的449460例糖尿病、心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。
社会网络分析指标,包括每个机构的边密度、度数中心性和中介中心性。
与有医生、执业护士(NP)或/和医师助理(PA)的机构相比,仅有医生的机构度数中心性较低,医生与医生之间的连接性较高。在由医生、NP或/和PA组成的初级保健机构中,非医生提供者与机构内所有提供者的连接性更强(以边密度衡量),但与机构内的医生相比,度数中心性更高。在调整患者特征和机构类型后,较高的边密度与较低的住院几率(优势比(OR)=0.89,95%置信区间(CI)=0.79 - 0.99)、急诊科(ER)就诊几率(OR = 0.80,95% CI = 0.70 - 0.92)和总支出(成本比(CR)=0.86,均值标准误(SE)=0.