Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostic & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Division of Imaging & Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Brain Topogr. 2021 Jan;34(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00813-1. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
First in vivo brain conductivity reconstructions using Helmholtz MR-Electrical Properties Tomography (MR-EPT) have been published. However, a large variation in the reconstructed conductivity values is reported and these values differ from ex vivo conductivity measurements. Given this lack of agreement, we performed an in vivo study on eight healthy subjects to provide reference in vivo brain conductivity values. MR-EPT reconstructions were performed at 3 T for eight healthy subjects. Mean conductivity and standard deviation values in the white matter, gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid (σ, σ, and σ) were computed for each subject before and after erosion of regions at tissue boundaries, which are affected by typical MR-EPT reconstruction errors. The obtained values were compared to the reported ex vivo literature values. To benchmark the accuracy of in vivo conductivity reconstructions, the same pipeline was applied to simulated data, which allow knowledge of ground truth conductivity. Provided sufficient boundary erosion, the in vivo σ and σ values obtained in this study agree for the first time with literature values measured ex vivo. This could not be verified for the CSF due to its limited spatial extension. Conductivity reconstructions from simulated data verified conductivity reconstructions from in vivo data and demonstrated the importance of discarding voxels at tissue boundaries. The presented σ and σ values can therefore be used for comparison in future studies employing different MR-EPT techniques.
首次使用亥姆霍兹磁共振-电特性层析成像(MR-EPT)进行了体内脑电导率重建。然而,据报道,重建的电导率值存在很大差异,且这些值与离体电导率测量值不同。鉴于这种不一致性,我们对 8 名健康受试者进行了一项体内研究,以提供体内脑电导率的参考值。在 3T 对 8 名健康受试者进行了 MR-EPT 重建。对每个受试者进行了组织边界处受典型 MR-EPT 重建误差影响的区域进行侵蚀前后的白质、灰质和脑脊液的平均电导率和标准差值(σ、σ 和 σ)的计算。将获得的值与报告的离体文献值进行了比较。为了验证体内电导率重建的准确性,将相同的管道应用于具有地面真实电导率的模拟数据。提供足够的边界侵蚀后,本研究中获得的体内 σ 和 σ 值首次与离体测量的文献值一致。由于脑脊液的空间扩展有限,因此无法对此进行验证。模拟数据的电导率重建验证了体内数据的电导率重建,并证明了在组织边界处丢弃体素的重要性。因此,所提出的 σ 和 σ 值可用于未来使用不同的 MR-EPT 技术的研究进行比较。