41 周引产或 42 周期待管理:随机试验的系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。

Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Vastra Gotaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2020 Dec 8;17(12):e1003436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003436. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of perinatal death and severe neonatal morbidity increases gradually after 41 weeks of pregnancy. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed if induction of labour (IOL) in uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks will improve perinatal outcomes. We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) on this subject.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase), The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO on February 21, 2020 for RCTs comparing IOL at 41 weeks with expectant management until 42 weeks in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Individual participant data (IPD) were sought from eligible RCTs. Primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse perinatal outcomes: mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Additional outcomes included neonatal admission, mode of delivery, perineal lacerations, and postpartum haemorrhage. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted for parity (nulliparous/multiparous), maternal age (<35/≥35 years), and body mass index (BMI) (<30/≥30). Aggregate data meta-analysis (MA) was performed to include data from RCTs for which IPD was not available. From 89 full-text articles, we identified three eligible RCTs (n = 5,161), and two contributed with IPD (n = 4,561). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups regarding age, parity, BMI, and higher level of education. IOL resulted overall in a decrease of severe adverse perinatal outcome (0.4% [10/2,281] versus 1.0% [23/2,280]; relative risk [RR] 0.43 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 to 0.91], p-value 0.027, risk difference [RD] -57/10,000 [95% CI -106/10,000 to -8/10,000], I2 0%). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 175 (95% CI 94 to 1,267). Perinatal deaths occurred in one (<0.1%) versus eight (0.4%) pregnancies (Peto odds ratio [OR] 0.21 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.78], p-value 0.019, RD -31/10,000, [95% CI -56/10,000 to -5/10,000], I2 0%, NNT 326, [95% CI 177 to 2,014]) and admission to a neonatal care unit ≥4 days occurred in 1.1% (24/2,280) versus 1.9% (46/2,273), (RR 0.52 [95% CI 0.32 to 0.85], p-value 0.009, RD -97/10,000 [95% CI -169/10,000 to -26/10,000], I2 0%, NNT 103 [95% CI 59 to 385]). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery (10.5% versus 10.7%; RR 0.98, [95% CI 0.83 to 1.16], p-value 0.81) nor in other important perinatal, delivery, and maternal outcomes. MA on aggregate data showed similar results. Prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome showed a significant difference in the treatment effect (p = 0.01 for interaction) for parity, but not for maternal age or BMI. The risk of severe adverse perinatal outcome was decreased for nulliparous women in the IOL group (0.3% [4/1,219] versus 1.6% [20/1,264]; RR 0.20 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.60], p-value 0.004, RD -127/10,000, [95% CI -204/10,000 to -50/10,000], I2 0%, NNT 79 [95% CI 49 to 201]) but not for multiparous women (0.6% [6/1,219] versus 0.3% [3/1,264]; RR 1.59 [95% CI 0.15 to 17.30], p-value 0.35, RD 27/10,000, [95% CI -29/10,000 to 84/10,000], I2 55%). A limitation of this IPD-MA was the risk of overestimation of the effect on perinatal mortality due to early stopping of the largest included trial for safety reasons after the advice of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Furthermore, only two RCTs were eligible for the IPD-MA; thus, the possibility to assess severe adverse neonatal outcomes with few events was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that, overall, IOL at 41 weeks improved perinatal outcome compared with expectant management until 42 weeks without increasing the cesarean delivery rate. This benefit is shown only in nulliparous women, whereas for multiparous women, the incidence of mortality and morbidity was too low to demonstrate any effect. The magnitude of risk reduction of perinatal mortality remains uncertain. Women with pregnancies approaching 41 weeks should be informed on the risk differences according to parity so that they are able to make an informed choice for IOL at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks. Study Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020163174.

摘要

背景

妊娠 41 周后,围产儿死亡和严重新生儿发病率的风险逐渐增加。几项随机对照试验(RCT)评估了在无并发症的妊娠中,在 41 周时进行引产(IOL)是否会改善围产期结局。我们对该主题进行了个体参与者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)。

方法和发现

我们于 2020 年 2 月 21 日在 PubMed、Excerpta Medica dataBASE(Embase)、Cochrane 图书馆、护理学和相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和 PsycINFO 上搜索了比较 IOL 在 41 周与直到 42 周时的期待管理在无并发症妊娠中的 RCT。从合格的 RCT 中寻求个体参与者数据(IPD)。主要结局是严重不良围产儿结局的复合结局:死亡率和严重新生儿发病率。其他结局包括新生儿入院、分娩方式、会阴裂伤和产后出血。进行了预先指定的亚组分析,包括产次(初产妇/经产妇)、产妇年龄(<35/≥35 岁)和体重指数(BMI)(<30/≥30)。进行了汇总数据荟萃分析(MA),以纳入 IPD 不可用的 RCT 数据。从 89 篇全文文章中,我们确定了三项符合条件的 RCT(n=5161),其中两项提供了 IPD(n=4561)。两组之间的年龄、产次、BMI 和较高的教育水平等基线特征相似。总体而言,IOL 降低了严重不良围产儿结局的发生率(0.4%[10/2281]与 1.0%[23/2280];相对风险[RR]0.43[95%置信区间(CI)0.21 至 0.91],p 值 0.027,风险差异[RD]-57/10,000[95%CI-106/10,000 至-8/10,000],I2 0%)。需要治疗的人数(NNT)为 175(95%CI 94 至 1,267)。围产儿死亡发生在 1 例(<0.1%)与 8 例(0.4%)妊娠中(Peto 比值比[OR]0.21[95%CI 0.06 至 0.78],p 值 0.019,RD-31/10,000[95%CI-56/10,000 至-5/10,000],I2 0%,NNT 326[95%CI 177 至 2,014]),有 1.1%(24/2280)与 1.9%(46/2273)的新生儿需要住院≥4 天(RR 0.52[95%CI 0.32 至 0.85],p 值 0.009,RD-97/10,000[95%CI-169/10,000 至-26/10,000],I2 0%,NNT 103[95%CI 59 至 385])。剖宫产率(10.5%与 10.7%;RR 0.98[95%CI 0.83 至 1.16],p 值 0.81)或其他重要的围产儿、分娩和产妇结局均无差异。汇总数据的 MA 显示了类似的结果。主要结局的预先指定的亚组分析显示,治疗效果(p=0.01 用于交互作用)在产次方面存在显著差异,但在产妇年龄或 BMI 方面没有差异。IOL 组的初产妇严重不良围产儿结局的风险降低(0.3%[4/1219]与 1.6%[20/1264];RR 0.20[95%CI 0.07 至 0.60],p 值 0.004,RD-127/10,000[95%CI-204/10,000 至-50/10,000],I2 0%,NNT 79[95%CI 49 至 201]),但经产妇(0.6%[6/1219]与 0.3%[3/1264];RR 1.59[95%CI 0.15 至 17.30],p 值 0.35,RD 27/10,000[95%CI-29/10,000 至 84/10,000],I2 55%)则无差异。这项 IPD-MA 的一个局限性是,由于数据和安全监测委员会的建议,最大的纳入试验出于安全原因提前停止,因此围产儿死亡率的影响可能被高估。此外,只有两项 RCT 符合 IPD-MA 的条件,因此,严重不良新生儿结局的事件发生率较低,限制了评估。

结论

在这项研究中,我们发现与直到 42 周的期待管理相比,41 周时的 IOL 总体上改善了围产儿结局,而不会增加剖宫产率。这种益处仅见于初产妇,而经产妇的死亡率和发病率太低,无法显示任何效果。围产儿死亡率的风险降低幅度仍不确定。接近 41 周妊娠的妇女应根据产次了解风险差异,以便她们能够对 41 周时的 IOL 或直到 42 周的期待管理做出知情选择。

研究注册

PROSPERO CRD42020163174。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edef/7723286/252637e81507/pmed.1003436.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索