Medicine and Oral Surgery Department, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (IINFACTS), IUCS - Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (CESPU), Gandra, Portugal.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Oral Dis. 2021 Nov;27(8):1977-1992. doi: 10.1111/odi.13747. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
We performed a systematic review to evaluate the published biomarkers related to oral leukoplakia (OL), aiming to identify the biomarkers that indicate any future risk of cancer in patients with oral leukoplakia.
A search strategy was developed for three main electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO, and also for Google Scholar, until February 28, 2020. The study selection was performed in a two-phase process aiming at studies assessing tissue biomarkers for "malignant transformation of OL." Risk of bias analysis of included studies was performed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies Tool.
From 3,130 articles initially identified by searching databases, a total of 46 studies were included in this systematic review, with a combined sample of 3,783 patients, of whom 1,047 presented with malignant transformation of a previously diagnosed OL as reported by the authors. The cancer incidence in the whole group was 27.6% (range: 5.4% to 54.1%). The studies were derived from different geographic areas, including Asia (n = 21), Europe (n = 15), North America (n = 9), and Oceania (n = 1). There were 49 different molecular biomarkers evaluated in the 46 included studies: p53 and podoplanin proteins were the most frequently reported, followed by abnormalities at particular chromosomal loci (e.g., LOH). Risk of bias analysis revealed concerns associated with "measurement of prognostic factor," "study confounding" and "statistical analysis and reporting."
Substantial heterogeneity and lack of standardized reporting of data among the studies were identified. The most promising biomarkers reported to have a significant association with the malignant transformation in OL included podoplanin and chromosomal loci abnormalities. A critical examination of the follow-up studies on OL published so far indicated that tissue biomarkers that could predict the risk of oral cancer in patients with OL are still in a discovery phase.
我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估与口腔白斑(OL)相关的已发表生物标志物,旨在确定口腔白斑患者未来癌症风险的生物标志物。
为三个主要电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 EBSCO)以及 Google Scholar 制定了搜索策略,检索截至 2020 年 2 月 28 日的研究。研究选择分两个阶段进行,旨在评估评估“OL 恶性转化”的组织生物标志物的研究。使用预后研究质量工具对纳入研究进行偏倚风险分析。
通过数据库搜索最初确定了 3130 篇文章,共有 46 项研究纳入本系统评价,共纳入 3783 例患者,其中 1047 例作者报告为先前诊断的 OL 恶性转化。全组癌症发生率为 27.6%(范围:5.4%至 54.1%)。这些研究来自不同的地理区域,包括亚洲(n=21)、欧洲(n=15)、北美(n=9)和大洋洲(n=1)。在 46 项纳入研究中评估了 49 种不同的分子生物标志物:p53 和 podoplanin 蛋白是最常报道的,其次是特定染色体位置的异常(例如 LOH)。偏倚风险分析显示,“预后因素的测量”、“研究混杂”和“统计分析和报告”存在问题。
研究之间存在明显的异质性和数据报告缺乏标准化。报道与 OL 恶性转化具有显著相关性的最有前途的生物标志物包括 podoplanin 和染色体位置异常。对迄今为止发表的关于 OL 的随访研究进行的批判性检查表明,能够预测 OL 患者口腔癌风险的组织生物标志物仍处于发现阶段。