National Security Science & Technology, Management Advisory Services, Logistics Management Institute, 7940 Jones Branch Drive, Tysons, VA 22102, USA.
Defense Biological Product Assurance Office (DBPAO), Joint Program Executive Office (JPEO) for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (CBRND) Joint Project Lead (JPL) CBRND Enabling Biotechnologies (EB), 110 Thomas Johnson Drive, Suite 250, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Viruses. 2020 Dec 4;12(12):1393. doi: 10.3390/v12121393.
Accurate pathogen detection and diagnosis is paramount in clinical success of treating patients. There are two general paradigms in pathogen detection: molecular and immuno-based, and phage-based detection is a third emerging paradigm due to its sensitivity and selectivity. Molecular detection methods look for genetic material specific for a given pathogen in a sample usually by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Immuno-methods look at the pathogen components (antigens) by antibodies raised against that pathogen specific antigens. There are different variations and products based on these two paradigms with advantages and disadvantages. The third paradigm at least for bacterial pathogen detection entails bacteriophages specific for a given bacterium. Sensitivity and specificity are the two key parameters in any pathogen detection system. By their very nature, bacteriophages afford the best sensitivity for bacterial detection. Bacteria and bacteriophages form the predator-prey pair in the evolutionary arms race and has coevolved over time to acquire the exquisite specificity of the pair, in some instances at the strain level. This specificity has been exploited for diagnostic purposes of various pathogens of concern in clinical and other settings. Many recent reviews focus on phage-based detection and sensor technologies. In this review, we focus on a very special group of pathogens that are of concern in biodefense because of their potential misuse in bioterrorism and their extremely virulent nature and as such fall under the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) Category A pathogen list. We describe the currently available phage methods that are based on the usual modalities of detection from culture, to molecular and immuno- and fluorescent methods. We further highlight the gaps and the needs for more modern technologies and sensors drawing from technologies existing for detection and surveillance of other pathogens of clinical relevance.
准确的病原体检测和诊断对于治疗患者的临床成功至关重要。病原体检测有两种主要范式:分子和免疫为基础的,噬菌体检测是第三种新兴范式,因为它具有敏感性和选择性。分子检测方法通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)寻找样本中特定病原体的遗传物质。免疫方法通过针对特定病原体抗原的抗体来检测病原体成分(抗原)。基于这两种范式有不同的变体和产品,各有优缺点。第三种范式至少对于细菌病原体检测来说,需要针对特定细菌的噬菌体。敏感性和特异性是任何病原体检测系统的两个关键参数。噬菌体由于其性质,为细菌检测提供了最佳的敏感性。细菌和噬菌体在进化军备竞赛中形成了捕食者-猎物对,随着时间的推移共同进化,以获得对这一对的高度特异性,在某些情况下达到菌株水平。这种特异性已被用于临床和其他环境中各种关注病原体的诊断目的。许多最近的综述都集中在基于噬菌体的检测和传感器技术上。在这篇综述中,我们重点关注一组非常特殊的病原体,这些病原体因其在生物恐怖主义中潜在的滥用而引起关注,因为它们具有极强的毒性,因此被列入疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的 A 类病原体清单。我们描述了目前可用于检测的噬菌体方法,这些方法基于从培养物到分子、免疫和荧光方法的常见检测模式。我们进一步强调了差距和对更现代技术和传感器的需求,这些技术借鉴了现有用于检测和监测临床相关其他病原体的技术。