• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体验采样干预对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的干预机制:使用即时数据的二次分析。

Intervention mechanisms of an experience sampling intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia: a secondary analysis using momentary data.

机构信息

Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2022 Feb;26(2):294-304. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1857692. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2020.1857692
PMID:33291998
Abstract

A psychosocial intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia promoted emotional well-being through self-monitoring and personalized feedback, as demonstrated in a previous randomized controlled trial. The mechanism behind the intervention effects is thought to lie in increased awareness of, and thus, engagement in behaviours that elicit positive emotions (PA). This secondary analysis tests the assumption by investigating momentary data on activities, affect, and stress and explores the relevance of personalized feedback compared to self-monitoring only. The intervention was based on the experience sampling method (ESM), meaning that carers self-monitored own affect and behaviours 10 times/day over 6 weeks. The experimental group received personalized feedback on behaviours that elicit PA, while the pseudo-experimental group performed self-monitoring only. A control group was also included. ESM-data of 72 carers was analysed using multilevel mixed-effects models. The experimental group reported significant increases in passive relaxation activities over the 6 weeks  = 0.28,  = 0.12,  = 2.43, .05). Passive relaxation in this group was negatively associated with negative affect ( = -0.50, .01) and positively associated with activity-related stress ( 0.52, .007) from baseline to post-intervention. Other activities in this or the other groups did not change significantly. Carer's daily behaviours were only affected when self-monitoring was combined with personalized feedback. Changing one's daily behaviour while caring for a person with dementia is challenging and aligned with mixed emotions. Acknowledging simultaneously positive and negative emotions, and feelings of stress is suggested to embrace the complexity of carer's life and provide sustainable support.

摘要

一项针对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的心理社会干预措施通过自我监测和个性化反馈促进了情感健康,这在前一项随机对照试验中得到了证明。干预效果的机制被认为在于提高了对引发积极情绪(PA)的行为的认识,从而促使人们更多地参与这些行为。这项二次分析通过对活动、情绪和压力的即时数据进行测试来检验这一假设,并探讨个性化反馈与仅自我监测相比的相关性。该干预措施基于经验采样法(ESM),即照顾者在 6 周内每天自我监测 10 次自身的情绪和行为。实验组收到了关于引发 PA 的行为的个性化反馈,而伪实验组仅进行自我监测。还包括一个对照组。使用多层混合效应模型对 72 名照顾者的 ESM 数据进行了分析。实验组在 6 周内报告被动放松活动显著增加  = 0.28,  = 0.12,  = 2.43, .05)。该组的被动放松与消极情绪呈负相关( = -0.50, .01),与活动相关的压力呈正相关( 0.52, .007),从基线到干预后。其他组的其他活动没有明显变化。只有当自我监测与个性化反馈相结合时,照顾者的日常行为才会受到影响。在照顾痴呆症患者的同时改变自己的日常行为是具有挑战性的,这与混合情绪一致。同时承认积极和消极情绪以及压力感,被认为是接受照顾者生活的复杂性并提供可持续支持的一种方式。

相似文献

1
Intervention mechanisms of an experience sampling intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia: a secondary analysis using momentary data.体验采样干预对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的干预机制:使用即时数据的二次分析。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Feb;26(2):294-304. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1857692. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
The necessity for sustainable intervention effects: lessons-learned from an experience sampling intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia.可持续干预效果的必要性:从一项针对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的体验抽样干预中获得的经验教训。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Dec;24(12):2082-2093. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1647130. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
An Experience Sampling Method Intervention for Dementia Caregivers: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对痴呆症照护者的体验抽样方法干预:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;26(12):1231-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): effectiveness of the experience sampling method intervention 'Partner in Sight' for spousal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial.应对痴呆症的日常挑战(DEAL-ID研究):经验抽样方法干预措施“目光伙伴”对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的有效性:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 11;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0834-5.
5
Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): process evaluation of the experience sampling method intervention 'Partner in Sight' for spousal caregivers of people with dementia.应对痴呆症日常挑战(deal-id 研究):对“伴侣在视线中”体验抽样方法干预措施用于痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的过程评估。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Sep;22(9):1199-1206. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1348466. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Self-monitoring and personalized feedback based on the experiencing sampling method as a tool to boost depression treatment: a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (ZELF-i).基于体验采样法的自我监测和个性化反馈作为促进抑郁症治疗的工具:一项实用随机对照试验(ZELF-i)的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1847-z.
7
Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): an experience sampling study to assess caregiver functioning in the flow of daily life.应对痴呆症日常挑战(deal-id 研究):一项评估日常护理者功能的体验抽样研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;32(9):949-958. doi: 10.1002/gps.4552. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Dealing with Daily Challenges in Dementia (Deal-id Study): An Experience Sampling Study to Assess Caregivers' Sense of Competence and Experienced Positive Affect in Daily Life.应对痴呆症的日常挑战(Deal-id研究):一项经验抽样研究,旨在评估照顾者在日常生活中的胜任感和体验到的积极情绪。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;25(8):852-859. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Experience sampling-based personalized feedback and positive affect: a randomized controlled trial in depressed patients.基于经验抽样的个性化反馈与积极情感:抑郁症患者的一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 2;10(6):e0128095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128095. eCollection 2015.
10
A manual-based intervention for carers of people with dementia and sleep disturbances: an acceptability and feasibility RCT.基于手册的痴呆症患者及其照料者睡眠障碍干预措施:一项可接受性和可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Dec;22(71):1-408. doi: 10.3310/hta22710.

引用本文的文献

1
A Web-Based Intervention Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.基于接纳与承诺疗法的网络干预对痴呆患者家属的效果:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 4;7:e53489. doi: 10.2196/53489.
2
The use of ecological momentary assessment for family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review.针对慢性病成年患者家庭照护者的生态瞬时评估应用:一项系统综述。
Health Psychol Res. 2024 Mar 1;12:93907. doi: 10.52965/001c.93907. eCollection 2024.
3
A scoping review of intensive longitudinal methods in informal caregivers of people with dementia.
痴呆患者非专业照护者的密集纵向研究方法的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04123-6.
4
FindMyApps eHealth intervention improves quality, not quantity, of home tablet use by people with dementia.“查找我的应用程序”电子健康干预措施提高了痴呆症患者在家中使用平板电脑的质量,而非数量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 30;10:1152077. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1152077. eCollection 2023.
5
Digital resilience monitoring of informal caregivers of persons with dementia for early detection of overburden: Development and pilot testing.痴呆症患者非正规照护者的数字弹性监测,以早期发现负担过重:开发和初步测试。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;38(1):e5869. doi: 10.1002/gps.5869.