Azad Amee D, Charles Anthony G, Ding Qian, Trickey Amber W, Wren Sherry M
Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
University of North Carolina Department of Surgery, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Arch Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;78(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00497-w.
Women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not have equal access to resources, such as education, employment, or healthcare compared to men. We sought to explore health disparities and associations between gender prioritization, sociocultural factors, and household decision-making in Central Malawi.
From June-August 2017, a cross-sectional study with 200 participants was conducted in Central Malawi. We evaluated respondents' access to care, prioritization within households, decision-making power, and gender equity which was measured using the Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) scale. Relationships between these outcomes and sociodemographic factors were analyzed using multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression.
We found that women were less likely than men to secure community-sourced healthcare financial aid (68.6% vs. 88.8%, p < 0.001) and more likely to underutilize necessary healthcare (37.2% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.02). Both men and women revealed low GEM scores, indicating adherence to traditional gender norms, though women were significantly less equitable (W:16.77 vs. M:17.65, p = 0.03). Being a woman (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.78) and prioritizing a woman as a decision-maker for large purchases (OR 0.38, CI 0.15-0.93) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of prioritizing women for medical treatment and being a member of the Chewa tribal group (OR 3.87, CI 1.83-8.18) and prioritizing women for education (OR 4.13, CI 2.13-8.01) was associated with a higher odds.
Women report greater barriers to healthcare and adhere to more traditional gender roles than men in this Central Malawian population. Women contribute to their own gender's barriers to care and economic empowerment alone is not enough to correct for these socially constructed roles. We found that education and matriarchal societies may protect against gender disparities. Overall, internal and external gender discrimination contribute to a woman's disproportionate lack of access to care.
与男性相比,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的女性在获取教育、就业或医疗保健等资源方面机会不均等。我们试图探讨马拉维中部地区的健康差距以及性别优先排序、社会文化因素和家庭决策之间的关联。
2017年6月至8月,在马拉维中部地区对200名参与者进行了一项横断面研究。我们评估了受访者获得医疗服务的情况、家庭内部的优先排序、决策权以及使用性别平等男性(GEM)量表衡量的性别平等情况。使用多变量混合效应逻辑回归分析这些结果与社会人口学因素之间的关系。
我们发现,女性获得社区提供的医疗保健经济援助的可能性低于男性(68.6%对88.8%,p<0.001),并且更有可能未充分利用必要的医疗保健服务(37.2%对22.4%,p=0.02)。男性和女性的GEM得分均较低,表明他们遵循传统的性别规范,不过女性的平等程度明显较低(女性:16.77对男性:17.65,p=0.03)。身为女性(优势比(OR)0.41,95%置信区间(CI)0.21-0.78)以及将女性作为大宗购买的决策者(OR 0.38,CI 0.15-0.93)与将女性列为医疗治疗优先对象的可能性较低独立相关,而属于契瓦部落群体(OR 3.87,CI 1.83-8.18)以及将女性列为教育优先对象(OR 4.13,CI 2.13-8.01)与较高的优势相关。
在这个马拉维中部人群中,女性报告称在获得医疗保健方面面临更大障碍,并且比男性更遵循传统性别角色。女性自身造成了其性别在获得医疗保健方面的障碍,仅靠经济赋权不足以纠正这些社会建构的角色。我们发现教育和母系社会可能有助于防止性别差距。总体而言,内部和外部的性别歧视导致女性在获得医疗保健方面的机会严重不均。