• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于理论的多组分干预措施,旨在减少职业男性工作者的职业久坐行为:一项整群随机交叉试点可行性研究的方案

A theory-based multicomponent intervention to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour in professional male workers: protocol for a cluster randomised crossover pilot feasibility study.

作者信息

Nicolson Gail Helena, Hayes Catherine, Darker Catherine

机构信息

Public Health & Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Institute of Population Health, Russell Centre, Tallaght Cross, Dublin, D24 DH74, Ireland.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 10;6(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00716-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-020-00716-9
PMID:33292787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7653741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged sitting, a significant risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality, is accumulated mostly in the workplace. There is limited research targeting specific at-risk populations to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour. A recent study found that professional males have the longest workplace sitting times. Current evidence supports the use of multi-level interventions developed using participative approaches. This study's primary aims are to test the viability of a future definitive intervention trial using a randomised pilot study, with secondary aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a multicomponent intervention to reduce workplace sitting.

METHODS

Two professional companies in Dublin, Ireland, will take part in a cluster randomised crossover pilot study. Office-based males will be recruited and randomised to the control or the intervention arms. The components of the intervention target multiple levels of influence including individual determinants (via mHealth technology to support behaviour change techniques), the physical work environment (via provision of an under-desk pedal machine), and the organisational structures and culture (via management consultation and recruitment to the study). The outcomes measured are recruitment and retention, minutes spent sedentary, and physical activity behaviours, work engagement, and acceptability and feasibility of the workplace intervention.

DISCUSSION

This study will establish the acceptability and feasibility of a workplace intervention which aims to reduce workplace SB and increase PA. It will identify key methodological and implementation issues that need to be addressed prior to assessing the effectiveness of this intervention in a definitive cluster randomised controlled trial.

摘要

背景

长时间坐着是发病率和死亡率增加的一个重要风险因素,大部分是在工作场所积累的。针对特定高危人群以减少职业久坐行为的研究有限。最近一项研究发现,职业男性在工作场所的久坐时间最长。目前的证据支持使用采用参与式方法制定的多层次干预措施。本研究的主要目的是通过一项随机试点研究来测试未来确定性干预试验的可行性,次要目的是探索多成分干预措施在减少工作场所久坐方面的可接受性和可行性。

方法

爱尔兰都柏林的两家专业公司将参与一项整群随机交叉试点研究。将招募办公室男性并随机分为对照组或干预组。干预措施的组成部分针对多个影响层面,包括个体决定因素(通过移动健康技术支持行为改变技巧)、物理工作环境(通过提供桌下踏板机)以及组织结构和文化(通过管理咨询和招募参与研究)。测量的结果包括招募和留存情况、久坐时间、身体活动行为、工作投入度以及工作场所干预措施的可接受性和可行性。

讨论

本研究将确定旨在减少工作场所久坐行为和增加身体活动的工作场所干预措施的可接受性和可行性。它将确定在确定性整群随机对照试验中评估该干预措施有效性之前需要解决的关键方法学和实施问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f405/7653741/ef3131c196fa/40814_2020_716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f405/7653741/ef3131c196fa/40814_2020_716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f405/7653741/ef3131c196fa/40814_2020_716_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A theory-based multicomponent intervention to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour in professional male workers: protocol for a cluster randomised crossover pilot feasibility study.一项基于理论的多组分干预措施,旨在减少职业男性工作者的职业久坐行为:一项整群随机交叉试点可行性研究的方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 10;6(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00716-9.
2
A Cluster-Randomised Crossover Pilot Feasibility Study of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behaviour in Professional Male Employees.多组分干预措施减少职业男性员工久坐行为的集群随机交叉先导可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179292.
3
The "Worktivity" mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled pilot study.“Worktivity” 移动健康干预措施减少工作场所久坐行为:一项可行性聚类随机对照试验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):1416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11473-6.
4
The physical activity at work (PAW) study protocol: a cluster randomised trial of a multicomponent short-break intervention to reduce sitting time and increase physical activity among office workers in Thailand.工作场所体力活动(PAW)研究方案:泰国一项多成分短休息干预措施的群组随机试验,以减少上班族的久坐时间并增加体力活动。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1332. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09427-5.
5
Providing NHS staff with height-adjustable workstations and behaviour change strategies to reduce workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work cluster randomised controlled trial.为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)工作人员提供可调节高度的工作站及行为改变策略以减少工作场所久坐时间:“多站立于工作中”(SMArT)工作群组随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 9;15:1219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2532-5.
6
Iterative development of Stand Up Australia: a multi-component intervention to reduce workplace sitting.澳大利亚“站起来”项目的迭代式开发:一项减少工作场所久坐行为的多成分干预措施。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Feb 21;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-21.
7
A three arm cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life intervention for reducing daily sitting time in office workers: study protocol.一项三臂群组随机对照试验,旨在测试 SMART 工作与生活干预在减少上班族日常久坐时间方面的有效性和成本效益:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 14;18(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6017-1.
8
Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作场所中具有数字元素的干预措施对减少办公室员工久坐行为的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 19;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01595-6.
9
The effect of a sit-stand workstation intervention on daily sitting, standing and physical activity: protocol for a 12 month workplace randomised control trial.坐站式工作站干预对日常坐姿、站姿和身体活动的影响:一项为期12个月的工作场所随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 15;15:152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1506-y.
10
Acceptability and feasibility of a low-cost, theory-based and co-produced intervention to reduce workplace sitting time in desk-based university employees.一种低成本、基于理论且共同制定的干预措施对于减少伏案工作的大学员工工作时久坐时间的可接受性和可行性。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 24;15:1294. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2635-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies.行为干预试点及可行性研究的综合指南。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 6;10(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01485-5.
2
Expert Perspectives on Pilot and Feasibility Studies: A Delphi Study and Consolidation of Considerations for Behavioral Interventions.关于试点研究和可行性研究的专家观点:一项德尔菲研究及行为干预考量的整合
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 15:rs.3.rs-3370077. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3370077/v1.
3
Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations of sedentary behavior in leisure and occupational contexts with symptoms of depression and anxiety.休闲和职业环境中的久坐行为与抑郁和焦虑症状的关联。
Prev Med. 2020 Feb 8;133:106021. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106021.
2
Occupational sitting time and subsequent risk of cancer: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study.职业久坐时间与随后癌症风险:日本基于公共卫生中心的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Mar;111(3):974-984. doi: 10.1111/cas.14304. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
The effect of using a cycling workstation on mouse dexterity.
基于办公室工作人员的多组分干预措施在减轻职业久坐行为方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 26;9:e44745. doi: 10.2196/44745.
4
A Cluster-Randomised Crossover Pilot Feasibility Study of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behaviour in Professional Male Employees.多组分干预措施减少职业男性员工久坐行为的集群随机交叉先导可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179292.
5
Understanding the Implementation of "Sit Less at Work" Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.理解三个组织中“减少工作时久坐”干预措施的实施情况:一项混合方法的过程评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(14):7361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147361.
使用可调节自行车工作站对鼠标操作灵活度的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0220896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220896. eCollection 2019.
4
Examining total and domain-specific sedentary behaviour using the socio-ecological model - a cross-sectional study of Irish adults.使用社会生态模型考察总体和特定领域的久坐行为 - 对爱尔兰成年人的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1155. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7447-0.
5
Use of Compositional Data Analysis to Show Estimated Changes in Cardiometabolic Health by Reallocating Time to Light-Intensity Physical Activity in Older Adults.运用成分数据分析方法,通过重新分配老年人的时间用于低强度体力活动,显示其对心脏代谢健康的估计变化。
Sports Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):205-217. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01153-2.
6
Sitting less at work: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in organisations of different size and sector.工作中减少久坐:不同规模和行业组织中障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7148-8.
7
Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review.促进职场身体活动及减少久坐行为的移动健康干预措施:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2019 Mar 27;5:2055207619839883. doi: 10.1177/2055207619839883. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Association of objective sedentary behaviour and self-rated health in English older adults.英国老年人客观久坐行为与自评健康状况的关联
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jan 11;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4050-5.
9
Association between physical activity, occupational sitting time and mortality in a general population: An 18-year prospective survey in Tanushimaru, Japan.普通人群中身体活动、职业久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联:日本种子丸町的一项18年前瞻性调查
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):758-766. doi: 10.1177/2047487318810020. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
Environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions to reduce adults' sitting time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.环境、行为和多组分干预措施以减少成年人久坐时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):315-325. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098968. Epub 2018 Oct 23.