Servotte Jean-Christophe, Welch-Horan T Bram, Mullan Paul, Piazza Justine, Ghuysen Alexandre, Szyld Demian
Public Health Sciences Department, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Interdisciplinary Medical Simulation Center of Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 Nov 11;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41077-020-00150-0.
Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing after clinical events in the emergency department (ED) to improve performance, but their implementation has been limited. We aimed to start a clinical debriefing program to identify opportunities to address teamwork and patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We reviewed existing literature on best-practice guidelines to answer key clinical debriefing program design questions. An end-of-shift huddle format for the debriefs allowed multiple cases of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 illness to be discussed in the same session, promoting situational awareness and team learning. A novel ED-based clinical debriefing tool was implemented and titled Debriefing In Situ COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Plus-Delta in Healthcare After Shifts End (DISCOVER-PHASE). A facilitator experienced in simulation debriefings would facilitate a short (10-25 min) discussion of the relevant cases by following a scripted series of stages for debriefing. Data on the number of debriefing opportunities, frequency of utilization of debriefing, debriefing location, and professional background of the facilitator were analyzed.
During the study period, the ED treated 3386 suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 11 deaths and 77 ICU admissions. Of the 187 debriefing opportunities in the first 8-week period, 163 (87.2%) were performed. Of the 24 debriefings not performed, 21 (87.5%) of these were during the four first weeks (21/24; 87.5%). Clinical debriefings had a median duration of 10 min (IQR 7-13). They were mostly facilitated by a nurse (85.9%) and mainly performed remotely (89.8%).
Debriefing with DISCOVER-PHASE during the COVID-19 pandemic were performed often, were relatively brief, and were most often led remotely by a nurse facilitator. Future research should describe the clinical and organizational impact of this DISCOVER-PHASE.
多项指南建议在急诊科临床事件发生后进行总结汇报以提高医疗表现,但这些建议的实施情况有限。我们旨在启动一项临床总结汇报项目,以确定在新冠疫情期间解决团队协作和患者安全问题的机会。
我们回顾了关于最佳实践指南的现有文献,以回答临床总结汇报项目设计的关键问题。采用轮班结束时的碰头会形式进行总结汇报,这样可以在同一次会议中讨论多例疑似或确诊的新冠病例,增强态势感知并促进团队学习。一种新型的基于急诊科的临床总结汇报工具被实施,名为“轮班结束后在新冠疫情中鼓励反思与正负面反馈的现场总结汇报”(DISCOVER-PHASE)。一位在模拟总结汇报方面有经验的主持人会按照一系列既定的总结汇报阶段,引导进行一场简短(10 - 25分钟)的相关病例讨论。分析了总结汇报机会的数量、总结汇报的使用频率、总结汇报地点以及主持人的专业背景等数据。
在研究期间,急诊科共治疗了3386例疑似或确诊的新冠病例,其中11例死亡,77例入住重症监护病房。在前8周的187次总结汇报机会中,163次(87.2%)进行了总结汇报。在未进行的24次总结汇报中,其中21次(87.5%)发生在最初的四周内(21/24;87.5%)。临床总结汇报的中位时长为10分钟(四分位间距7至13分钟)。它们大多由护士主持(85.9%),且主要通过远程方式进行(89.8%)。
在新冠疫情期间,使用DISCOVER-PHASE进行的总结汇报经常开展,相对简短,且大多由护士主持人通过远程方式进行。未来的研究应描述这一DISCOVER-PHASE的临床和组织影响。